Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Protoform Mazda6 GX Handling? >

Protoform Mazda6 GX Handling?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Protoform Mazda6 GX Handling?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2013 | 10:42 AM
  #16  
locked's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,758
From: Toronto
Default

Thanks for clarifying Eric. Can't wait to try one out. It looks great.
locked is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 11:06 AM
  #17  
wtcc's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,033
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by EricPF
Hey Dave,

This was the original intent, but the more the body developed, it sort of took on a 'life of its own' and the end result has a body that we think will be more for the outdoor asphalt crowd as EA said. But again we will wait to hear feedback from our team of drivers.

Whichever slot it fits into, be assured that we plan on doing an "opposite" body in the coming months as well. (ie. if we find the new GX is dynamite outdoors, we will aim the next body at carpet, or vice versa).
That sounds as if you don't know what you did Weren't you guys making simulations (digital and in an aero tunnel)?
wtcc is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 11:25 AM
  #18  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
Default

I really like the Montech Nazda 4 for indoor carpet. It's really planted compared to the ltc-r and has better rear grip than the R9 with similar steering. I am keen on trying this though, I seem to do ok with aggressive shells.
Qatmix is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 11:38 AM
  #19  
Skiddins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,951
From: Windsor, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Qatmix
I really like the Montech Nazda 4 for indoor carpet. It's really planted compared to the ltc-r and has better rear grip than the R9 with similar steering. I am keen on trying this though, I seem to do ok with aggressive shells.
I found the Nazda 4 undriveable on carpet, but that would have been on low-medium grip. Nazda 3.0 was easier to drive.

The Nazda 4 rear wing is so far forward compared to everything else.
Skiddins is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 299
From: Redlands, CA
Default

Originally Posted by wtcc
That sounds as if you don't know what you did
Not quite. Its more a case of the more we analyzed the real Mazda6 GX race car, the more we determined that its characteristics are better suited for a high-downforce type body and thats fully what we expect. No bodies have been produced yet so we don't yet have any data.
Attached Thumbnails Protoform Mazda6 GX Handling?-sstp-1304-06-mazda-motorsports-media-lunch-mazda6-gx.jpg  

Last edited by EricPF; 10-17-2013 at 02:21 PM.
EricPF is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 02:26 PM
  #21  
mkiiina's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,415
From: Frisco TX
Default

Originally Posted by RobS
Not a lot of love for the P37 here... I personally love that body. Although I do always have all 3 bodies with me on race day just in case. I use the P37 95% of the time on carpet no matter what the traction is, and only switch to the Mazda 6 when I need something less agressive. The LTC only comes out on very rare occasions, but the P37 usually does the trick. Very underrated body in my opinion. Can't wait to see what the new GX brings!
Agreed. I tested the 6 and the LTC-R when I first got into sedan and the P37 seemed to suit my driving style the best. Similiar to the Gianna vs sophia body in WGT. When the new GX comes out I'll need to give it a try as well.
mkiiina is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 04:04 PM
  #22  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins
I found the Nazda 4 undriveable on carpet, but that would have been on low-medium grip. Nazda 3.0 was easier to drive.

The Nazda 4 rear wing is so far forward compared to everything else.
I do have the wing quite far back, I usually run on a very low grip carpet and its also very technical so I need a lot of steering. I like the ltc-r and also the R9 (which is quite popular at our club).

A lot of us used to run foams until quite recently so we do like a maniac amount of steering.
Qatmix is offline  
Old 10-17-2013 | 04:43 PM
  #23  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by wtcc
That sounds as if you don't know what you did Weren't you guys making simulations (digital and in an aero tunnel)?
Are you willing to pay $100+ per body?
CoreyW. is offline  
Old 10-18-2013 | 06:43 AM
  #24  
wtcc's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,033
From: Germany
Default

If one of the biggest body producer, selling ten thousands of bodies to racers worldwide, announces the successor of the most successful touring car body of all time, I expect them to have analyzed what makes the "old" shell so good, and what were its weaknesses to improve in all areas. Therefore they must have "tools" to verify what we as drivers feel on track. As it is all about aerodynamics some strategies to know what the air does would be useful. CAD-Simulations can help as well as aeropaint. And some wind tunnel time can be bought "cheap" from universities. No need to ask McLaren for that...
wtcc is offline  
Old 10-18-2013 | 07:07 AM
  #25  
RobS's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 991
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

I think their main tool is feedback from drivers themselves. I also think the Global Body Spec rule also puts them in a box as to what and how many changes they can make to keep the body within the GBS limits.

Whatever they do whether it be wind tunnels and computer programming or good ole fashioned hands-on molding, I am certain they know what they are doing based on their track record.
RobS is offline  
Old 10-18-2013 | 12:33 PM
  #26  
F. Mendoza's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,271
From: SoCal
Default

I'm sure once they are released they will be hard to come across for a while. Everyone will want them.

Heck, just look at this thread.
F. Mendoza is offline  
Old 01-01-2014 | 09:13 AM
  #27  
Nipple's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
From: Kallang Airport
Default

Has anyone tested it?
And compared it with the Ride Subaru WRX?

Thanks!
Nipple is offline  
Old 01-01-2014 | 10:28 AM
  #28  
Skiddins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,951
From: Windsor, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Nipple
Has anyone tested it?
And compared it with the Ride Subaru WRX?

Thanks!
I haven't run the GX yet, but the Ride Subaru is ridiculously safe, far more than the Speed 6, so it should be more aggressive.

Skiddins
Skiddins is offline  
Old 01-01-2014 | 02:31 PM
  #29  
HappyHippo's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 642
From: Europe
Default

Originally Posted by Skiddins
I've had to stick the wing so far out the back just to stop it spinning instantly on asphalt.
Wrong rear wing
HappyHippo is offline  
Old 01-01-2014 | 03:48 PM
  #30  
Skiddins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,951
From: Windsor, UK
Default

Originally Posted by HappyHippo
Wrong rear wing
It was the one that came with it.
If you mount it so less than 10mm sticks out past the rear bumper, the wing is nearly 10mm further forward than any of my other bodies.
Skiddins is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.