View Poll Results: what's your tire choice?
Protoform
46
30.67%
HPI
104
69.33%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing Part 2
#7773
Tech Fanatic
#7775
I just started racing USVTA, what is the average ride height you folks run on asphalt tracks? I've got a Spec R S1
#7779
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
Best motor
I'm looking for a new motor for my USGT and want the best. I currently have a Tekin but I was told that there are others that are better suited for this. Money or name are not really an issue and we are not that stricken at my track, so give me some suggestion.
#7782
You'll have more luck in the usgt thread, this one is pretty much trans-am. I'm not going to start a 21.5 motor argument in this thread so I will just recommend you try the other thread.
#7783
Tech Elite
iTrader: (66)
So this thread has been rather dead lately and its time to liven it up for a couple days. What I am proposing is a philosophical one. I am not advocating for any type of rule change. The rules are great the way they are. This is just to ask what everyones opinion on this matter is. Also USVTA is already taken steps to address this issue by having proand sportsman VTA at the Southern Nats. So lets begin.
Sponsored drivers in what even the founders consider an entry level class. Even if not said outright they set the rules up to be entry level. Keeping weight high to allow older and/or cheaper kits. Keeping the battery MAH low to keep price down. And until recently allowing only very limited ESC's to be used. There is nothing wrong with this rule set, it does help bring new people into the class. But those new people can be very easily imtemidated by a driver that has sponsors for his ride. Whether its chassis, battery, or any other sponsorship, its more than what a new guy with a TC4 has getting everything on his own and trying to compete.
Now to be fair some of those sponsored drivers take the time to help the new guys or anyone else at the track for that matter, and have a great attitude. But I have also seen sponsored drivers to some of the worst people on the track attitude wise and the only thing they bring in for their sponsors are wins, not goodwill.
So what does everyone think. Do sponsored drivers in USVTA, help or hinder the class?
Sponsored drivers in what even the founders consider an entry level class. Even if not said outright they set the rules up to be entry level. Keeping weight high to allow older and/or cheaper kits. Keeping the battery MAH low to keep price down. And until recently allowing only very limited ESC's to be used. There is nothing wrong with this rule set, it does help bring new people into the class. But those new people can be very easily imtemidated by a driver that has sponsors for his ride. Whether its chassis, battery, or any other sponsorship, its more than what a new guy with a TC4 has getting everything on his own and trying to compete.
Now to be fair some of those sponsored drivers take the time to help the new guys or anyone else at the track for that matter, and have a great attitude. But I have also seen sponsored drivers to some of the worst people on the track attitude wise and the only thing they bring in for their sponsors are wins, not goodwill.
So what does everyone think. Do sponsored drivers in USVTA, help or hinder the class?
#7784
Tech Elite
iTrader: (66)
So this thread has been rather dead lately and its time to liven it up for a couple days. What I am proposing is a philosophical one. I am not advocating for any type of rule change. The rules are great the way they are. This is just to ask what everyones opinion on this matter is. Also USVTA is already taken steps to address this issue by having proand sportsman VTA at the Southern Nats. So lets begin.
Sponsored drivers in what even the founders consider an entry level class. Even if not said outright they set the rules up to be entry level. Keeping weight high to allow older and/or cheaper kits. Keeping the battery MAH low to keep price down. And until recently allowing only very limited ESC's to be used. There is nothing wrong with this rule set, it does help bring new people into the class. But those new people can be very easily imtemidated by a driver that has sponsors for his ride. Whether its chassis, battery, or any other sponsorship, its more than what a new guy with a TC4 has getting everything on his own and trying to compete.
Now to be fair some of those sponsored drivers take the time to help the new guys or anyone else at the track for that matter, and have a great attitude. But I have also seen sponsored drivers to some of the worst people on the track attitude wise and the only thing they bring in for their sponsors are wins, not goodwill.
So what does everyone think. Do sponsored drivers in USVTA, help or hinder the class?
Sponsored drivers in what even the founders consider an entry level class. Even if not said outright they set the rules up to be entry level. Keeping weight high to allow older and/or cheaper kits. Keeping the battery MAH low to keep price down. And until recently allowing only very limited ESC's to be used. There is nothing wrong with this rule set, it does help bring new people into the class. But those new people can be very easily imtemidated by a driver that has sponsors for his ride. Whether its chassis, battery, or any other sponsorship, its more than what a new guy with a TC4 has getting everything on his own and trying to compete.
Now to be fair some of those sponsored drivers take the time to help the new guys or anyone else at the track for that matter, and have a great attitude. But I have also seen sponsored drivers to some of the worst people on the track attitude wise and the only thing they bring in for their sponsors are wins, not goodwill.
So what does everyone think. Do sponsored drivers in USVTA, help or hinder the class?
#7785
Tech Addict
You can say that again...