Reflex Suspension Dynamics (RSD) TC6 Upgrades (vertical ball studs, pistons,etc)
#616
Tech Fanatic
For the most conditions your right but I drive on a very very high bite carpet and we (AE drivers) can't get rid of the chatter no matter what we tried. I see other drivers with different brands that solved this with DCJ's. My car sounds like a bumble bee in the corners and if I make less DR I have no steering...
Regards
Regards
Cristian, don't take it badly, it is a comment only, if I felt I needed DCJs I'll get yours, your stuff is top, will make another order soon for my son's car, maybe by then I will need DCJs
#617
No worries, I just don't want a pissing match to start on our threads. Opinions not related to comments are often misunderstood and have the effect of taking threads on a tangent. As they are now. :P
Now if Geberit had been asking as to whether they are necessary or not, then that's a different story.
Anyways. Back on topic.
Thanks for your vouch of confidence Olly.
Scott, same with you. We are certainly interested in having shops carry our products!
Now if Geberit had been asking as to whether they are necessary or not, then that's a different story.
Anyways. Back on topic.
Thanks for your vouch of confidence Olly.
Scott, same with you. We are certainly interested in having shops carry our products!
#618
Tech Adept
Christian
I used your shock tower mounts & springs this weekend on the tc6.
Holy shit is that car dialed, I ran my best lap ever on dirty tires on a low battery pack, cannot wait to get the ball studs & shock pistons!!
thanks again
I used your shock tower mounts & springs this weekend on the tc6.
Holy shit is that car dialed, I ran my best lap ever on dirty tires on a low battery pack, cannot wait to get the ball studs & shock pistons!!
thanks again
#621
Tech Fanatic
#622
Tech Regular
Some locals at our track were just exploring my car and they felt the shocks. They were really like . They didn't expect that my TC6 had so smooth shocks. Man. Im happy.
I also have the balls stud thing (bought it from a friend, unused) and can't wait to try the new positions out.
I also have the balls stud thing (bought it from a friend, unused) and can't wait to try the new positions out.
#623
SlowPushin', Olly got the answer correct.
The only modification that needs to be done is the caster block hole needs to be enlarged slightly. I used a Hudy Body Reamer and took away material little, by little until they did not rub at full lock anymore.
Dennis, I am glad you like the parts!!
The only modification that needs to be done is the caster block hole needs to be enlarged slightly. I used a Hudy Body Reamer and took away material little, by little until they did not rub at full lock anymore.
Dennis, I am glad you like the parts!!
#624
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
#626
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
Some locals at our track were just exploring my car and they felt the shocks. They were really like . They didn't expect that my TC6 had so smooth shocks. Man. Im happy.
I also have the balls stud thing (bought it from a friend, unused) and can't wait to try the new positions out.
I also have the balls stud thing (bought it from a friend, unused) and can't wait to try the new positions out.
As I've mentioned before, it also makes maintenance (rebuilding/topping off oil) much less frequent!
Aside from tires, I feel properly built shocks are the most important thing. If one shock is leaking or bent, it literally affects every action of the suspension!
#627
How long is the wait time for this product . I would love to have a set in my car now . When you have the finish product please email [email protected]
#628
Tech Addict
iTrader: (29)
184mm Narrow vs Wide 190mm Track width
Ok I'm on holiday and have time to ponder my setup. Any thoughts on track width overall in regards to the wishbone spacing?
Of course wider front takes away steering/ wider rear adds steering, neglecting all the other things effected.
But what about the same setup with the min (about 184mm?) track width vs 190mm max track width (Roar Legal). Maintaining whatever relative width you run front-to-back and shock spring rate.
I'm curious if the car would react quicker with same grip. If you left the inner link position the same, then you would get slightly higher RC's, shorter links, more camber gain, but would have to adjust shock position to maintain same spring rate.
Plus the slightly narrower CG R/L weight balance. Might look a little funny with the tires so far in the body though.
Maybe just moving the link toward the inside is the same difference?
Anyone in RSD land try this back to back? I would guess stability would be affected somewhat. It's such a pain to try without a full day of practice I want some opinions first
Of course wider front takes away steering/ wider rear adds steering, neglecting all the other things effected.
But what about the same setup with the min (about 184mm?) track width vs 190mm max track width (Roar Legal). Maintaining whatever relative width you run front-to-back and shock spring rate.
I'm curious if the car would react quicker with same grip. If you left the inner link position the same, then you would get slightly higher RC's, shorter links, more camber gain, but would have to adjust shock position to maintain same spring rate.
Plus the slightly narrower CG R/L weight balance. Might look a little funny with the tires so far in the body though.
Maybe just moving the link toward the inside is the same difference?
Anyone in RSD land try this back to back? I would guess stability would be affected somewhat. It's such a pain to try without a full day of practice I want some opinions first
#629
Wider will take away some traction, while increasing stability. Narrower, the car will roll more and "dig" into the corner more. That's kind of the mega cliff notes of it.
The production of the new wheel hex spacers just came in today so we can test the cars tomorrow at max width to see the effect of a wider car. While not the same as making the hinge pin position further out, it will achieve a similar effect. My feeling is that the car will react a bit slower and become a little more sluggish.
The production of the new wheel hex spacers just came in today so we can test the cars tomorrow at max width to see the effect of a wider car. While not the same as making the hinge pin position further out, it will achieve a similar effect. My feeling is that the car will react a bit slower and become a little more sluggish.
#630
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
Ok I'm on holiday and have time to ponder my setup. Any thoughts on track width overall in regards to the wishbone spacing?
Of course wider front takes away steering/ wider rear adds steering, neglecting all the other things effected.
But what about the same setup with the min (about 184mm?) track width vs 190mm max track width (Roar Legal). Maintaining whatever relative width you run front-to-back and shock spring rate.
I'm curious if the car would react quicker with same grip. If you left the inner link position the same, then you would get slightly higher RC's, shorter links, more camber gain, but would have to adjust shock position to maintain same spring rate.
Plus the slightly narrower CG R/L weight balance. Might look a little funny with the tires so far in the body though.
Maybe just moving the link toward the inside is the same difference?
Anyone in RSD land try this back to back? I would guess stability would be affected somewhat. It's such a pain to try without a full day of practice I want some opinions first
Of course wider front takes away steering/ wider rear adds steering, neglecting all the other things effected.
But what about the same setup with the min (about 184mm?) track width vs 190mm max track width (Roar Legal). Maintaining whatever relative width you run front-to-back and shock spring rate.
I'm curious if the car would react quicker with same grip. If you left the inner link position the same, then you would get slightly higher RC's, shorter links, more camber gain, but would have to adjust shock position to maintain same spring rate.
Plus the slightly narrower CG R/L weight balance. Might look a little funny with the tires so far in the body though.
Maybe just moving the link toward the inside is the same difference?
Anyone in RSD land try this back to back? I would guess stability would be affected somewhat. It's such a pain to try without a full day of practice I want some opinions first
In low bite, max track width aids grip and stability. In high bite, narrowing the rear end increases lateral weight transfer, which decreases lateral grip, giving you more steering. I always like the front of the car 3-4mm wider than the rear.
That's how I see it........