1/12 forum
I second that statement. All I have been hearing from the Lipo guys is that this technology is going to save the hobby, when in fact lipo is more dangerous than NiMH. I have only seen two different packs vent and I have been racing competively for close to five years now. I have also heard about many more lipo packs melting down, exploding etc. There is nothing wrong with the four cell rule as it stands now. Just like I have quoted above from Cypress, the NiMH cells are very reliable and very low maintance. Also, you get much more voltage from a four cell NiMH battery pack than you will a Lipo.
There also has been discussion about putting a voltage regulator in a 7.4 Lipo pack. Anyone want to start a pool as to who will be the first to fool around with this "regulator or resistor" to get slightly more voltage supplied from the pack?
There also has been discussion about putting a voltage regulator in a 7.4 Lipo pack. Anyone want to start a pool as to who will be the first to fool around with this "regulator or resistor" to get slightly more voltage supplied from the pack?
But seriously, I don't think Lipo is going to save the hobby. It's just going to provide a new option that is cheaper and easier to maintain then nimh's. I've seen both go up, and 9 times out of 10 it's user error. Also, it depends on the type of cell for both cases. I've had an orion cell puff up, but not catch on fire or anything (apparently running one in a touring car on a 100 degree day with a 3.5 isn't good). Meanwhile, I've had IB cells vent and witnessed one IB pack blow up. Likewise, I've seen a maxamps pack melt a car due to it not being charged in a lipo sack. EP and EG cells seem to be more reliable.
In both cases, I think we read and see about the extreme cases. I don't think there were any incidents at ROAR nationals this past weekend and plenty of drivers were using both technologies.
Paul
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
For heavens sake give it a rest - we are all heartily sick of people who have seen this, seen that, know this, know that. These are the only verifiable facts...
When a LiPo fails it fails catastrophically - heat runaway leading to fire.
When an MiMh fails, it fails benignly - heat and energy dissipation leading to inert state.
LiPo and NiMh are no longer the future - the patented A123 battery structure is.
Whatever you use, just use it. Stop trying to set one part of RC against the other. It isn't big and it isn't clever. Do you want RC to be losing people because all you can find to say is negative to one technology or another?
When a LiPo fails it fails catastrophically - heat runaway leading to fire.
When an MiMh fails, it fails benignly - heat and energy dissipation leading to inert state.
LiPo and NiMh are no longer the future - the patented A123 battery structure is.
Whatever you use, just use it. Stop trying to set one part of RC against the other. It isn't big and it isn't clever. Do you want RC to be losing people because all you can find to say is negative to one technology or another?
I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
Not to sound like a smart ass or show anyone up or anyhting like that but i thought this was a 1/12th thread not a lipo vs. nimh vs. a123. there are probably threads like that all over so go to them and have your little debate.
Bob, we are talking about Lipo vs. NiMH IN 12th scales. Besides, in my opinion, NiMH are still way safer and give you the best performance.
how can you guys do that if it hasn't even happened yet. Except for the fact that smc is coming out with one but it still hasn't happened and i heard to run one of those you have to have a reciever pack to be able to run a servo. and i got that out of that smc thread. but what ever im sticking with nimh
Who cares about lipo in 12th,its not like I have ever even seen one in a 12th scale at the track.From what I read they seem like forever away ,and just way to comlplicated for 12th scale being 3.7,and the electronics dilemna??Im concentrating on racing my nimh,not questionable new tech..Thats my 2 cents,later,Tim.
Nimh's don't just vent and go inert. They can also embed themselves in 2x4s as witnessed at the 07 Oval Carpet Nats. (yes this was caused by user error)
I'm just sick of people comparing what they've seen at their track in the case of Nimh's versus what they read about on the net about Lipos.
Anyways, what rear pod for the 12L4 would be a good upgrade to allow easier use of brushless motors?
Thanks,
Paul
I'm just sick of people comparing what they've seen at their track in the case of Nimh's versus what they read about on the net about Lipos.
Anyways, what rear pod for the 12L4 would be a good upgrade to allow easier use of brushless motors?
Thanks,
Paul
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
A123 are concentrating on electric (full-size) cars, and ahve more money being given to them by GM, Toyota, Honda and Ford than they have time to do the development. Also, Toshiba, Sony and Apple are wanting them for computers. We (RC) come way down the order, that's why we have to wait. But, when they come, LiPo will be yesterday's news.
And meanwhile, back in the thread, LiPo won't make inroads to 12th anytime soon. Avoid IBs, and the NiMh cell is back where it was three years ago - simple to use, not failing, and providing enough power to run any motor you can get in the car for eight minutes. Like the other posters above, I'm sticking with what works for 12th. If you're desperate to run LiPo, you'll have to look elsewhere, because LiPo in 12th is complex and too light, so it lacks traction and handling.
I've actually been using LiPO for 3 years. Its been fine, and I have only puffed 2 packs, but only because I accidentally shorted 1 and the other was internally shorted due to getting hit.



2991Likes