Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2991Likes

1/12 forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2008 | 07:40 PM
  #29191  
Tubaboy's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 582
From: Riverton, WY
Default

Originally Posted by MUDVAYNE
I second that statement. All I have been hearing from the Lipo guys is that this technology is going to save the hobby, when in fact lipo is more dangerous than NiMH. I have only seen two different packs vent and I have been racing competively for close to five years now. I have also heard about many more lipo packs melting down, exploding etc. There is nothing wrong with the four cell rule as it stands now. Just like I have quoted above from Cypress, the NiMH cells are very reliable and very low maintance. Also, you get much more voltage from a four cell NiMH battery pack than you will a Lipo.
There also has been discussion about putting a voltage regulator in a 7.4 Lipo pack. Anyone want to start a pool as to who will be the first to fool around with this "regulator or resistor" to get slightly more voltage supplied from the pack?
Interesting. You compare how many nimh's you've seen vent versus how many lipos you've heard gone up, not that you saw in person. Great comparison!!

But seriously, I don't think Lipo is going to save the hobby. It's just going to provide a new option that is cheaper and easier to maintain then nimh's. I've seen both go up, and 9 times out of 10 it's user error. Also, it depends on the type of cell for both cases. I've had an orion cell puff up, but not catch on fire or anything (apparently running one in a touring car on a 100 degree day with a 3.5 isn't good). Meanwhile, I've had IB cells vent and witnessed one IB pack blow up. Likewise, I've seen a maxamps pack melt a car due to it not being charged in a lipo sack. EP and EG cells seem to be more reliable.

In both cases, I think we read and see about the extreme cases. I don't think there were any incidents at ROAR nationals this past weekend and plenty of drivers were using both technologies.

Paul
Tubaboy is offline  
Old 08-19-2008 | 10:52 PM
  #29192  
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

For heavens sake give it a rest - we are all heartily sick of people who have seen this, seen that, know this, know that. These are the only verifiable facts...

When a LiPo fails it fails catastrophically - heat runaway leading to fire.
When an MiMh fails, it fails benignly - heat and energy dissipation leading to inert state.
LiPo and NiMh are no longer the future - the patented A123 battery structure is.

Whatever you use, just use it. Stop trying to set one part of RC against the other. It isn't big and it isn't clever. Do you want RC to be losing people because all you can find to say is negative to one technology or another?
SlowerOne is offline  
Old 08-19-2008 | 11:09 PM
  #29193  
rezenclowd3's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,367
From: Solvang, CA
Default

I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
rezenclowd3 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008 | 11:59 PM
  #29194  
RCSteve93's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,601
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by rezenclowd3
I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
A123 sucks in the performance end... It is all about the safety of it...
RCSteve93 is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 05:50 AM
  #29195  
beta bob's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

Not to sound like a smart ass or show anyone up or anyhting like that but i thought this was a 1/12th thread not a lipo vs. nimh vs. a123. there are probably threads like that all over so go to them and have your little debate.
beta bob is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 05:58 AM
  #29196  
K Feath's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by beta bob
Not to sound like a smart ass or show anyone up or anyhting like that but i thought this was a 1/12th thread not a lipo vs. nimh vs. a123. there are probably threads like that all over so go to them and have your little debate.
Bob, we are talking about Lipo vs. NiMH IN 12th scales. Besides, in my opinion, NiMH are still way safer and give you the best performance.
K Feath is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 06:41 AM
  #29197  
beta bob's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

how can you guys do that if it hasn't even happened yet. Except for the fact that smc is coming out with one but it still hasn't happened and i heard to run one of those you have to have a reciever pack to be able to run a servo. and i got that out of that smc thread. but what ever im sticking with nimh
beta bob is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 08:14 AM
  #29198  
intimidator's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 257
From: Orlando,Florida
Default

Who cares about lipo in 12th,its not like I have ever even seen one in a 12th scale at the track.From what I read they seem like forever away ,and just way to comlplicated for 12th scale being 3.7,and the electronics dilemna??Im concentrating on racing my nimh,not questionable new tech..Thats my 2 cents,later,Tim.
intimidator is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 08:44 AM
  #29199  
Tubaboy's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 582
From: Riverton, WY
Default

Nimh's don't just vent and go inert. They can also embed themselves in 2x4s as witnessed at the 07 Oval Carpet Nats. (yes this was caused by user error)

I'm just sick of people comparing what they've seen at their track in the case of Nimh's versus what they read about on the net about Lipos.

Anyways, what rear pod for the 12L4 would be a good upgrade to allow easier use of brushless motors?

Thanks,
Paul
Tubaboy is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 12:41 PM
  #29200  
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by rezenclowd3
I've seen the A123 cells in an 8th buggy, and honestly it was quite unimpressive. It would not come close to finishing our 20min main and it had an unimpressive top speed and acceleration. The users lipo was MUCH better, and ran about 18 minutes vs the 4-5 of the A123 cells. They were MUCH too large as well compared to the lipo.
That's because they are 2 to 3 years away from being right for RC. Two to three years ago, you'd have said the same about LiPo. comparing the here and now with the future is futile.

A123 are concentrating on electric (full-size) cars, and ahve more money being given to them by GM, Toyota, Honda and Ford than they have time to do the development. Also, Toshiba, Sony and Apple are wanting them for computers. We (RC) come way down the order, that's why we have to wait. But, when they come, LiPo will be yesterday's news.

And meanwhile, back in the thread, LiPo won't make inroads to 12th anytime soon. Avoid IBs, and the NiMh cell is back where it was three years ago - simple to use, not failing, and providing enough power to run any motor you can get in the car for eight minutes. Like the other posters above, I'm sticking with what works for 12th. If you're desperate to run LiPo, you'll have to look elsewhere, because LiPo in 12th is complex and too light, so it lacks traction and handling.
SlowerOne is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 03:12 PM
  #29201  
RCSteve93's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,601
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Tubaboy
Anyways, what rear pod for the 12L4 would be a good upgrade to allow easier use of brushless motors?

Thanks,
Paul
Once the Team Kwik car comes out The rear pod should be able to bolt onto a L4 no problem. The Kwik car has the nicest pod I have seen to date.
RCSteve93 is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 03:45 PM
  #29202  
rezenclowd3's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,367
From: Solvang, CA
Default

Originally Posted by SlowerOne
That's because they are 2 to 3 years away from being right for RC. Two to three years ago, you'd have said the same about LiPo. comparing the here and now with the future is futile.
I've actually been using LiPO for 3 years. Its been fine, and I have only puffed 2 packs, but only because I accidentally shorted 1 and the other was internally shorted due to getting hit.
rezenclowd3 is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 03:52 PM
  #29203  
beta bob's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

Originally Posted by RCSteve93
Once the Team Kwik car comes out The rear pod should be able to bolt onto a L4 no problem. The Kwik car has the nicest pod I have seen to date.

Yea team kwik's car is really nice if i had patience i would get it because of well thought out it was.
beta bob is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 05:21 PM
  #29204  
Tubaboy's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 582
From: Riverton, WY
Default

any pics? sources where they sell their stuff at? I don't have a local hobby shop, so my purchases are normally online.
Tubaboy is offline  
Old 08-20-2008 | 06:18 PM
  #29205  
RCSteve93's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,601
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Tubaboy
any pics? sources where they sell their stuff at? I don't have a local hobby shop, so my purchases are normally online.
http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...2th-scale.html
RCSteve93 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.