TA-05 ver.2
#331
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
Had a few options part installed on my ver 2 such as seperate suspension mounts, steering set, rocker arm set, pinions and gears. Am planning to get the Tamiya's option part front bulkhead from the ifs as that seems to be the correct fit. Does anyone knows the option part number for the rear bulkhead that fits the ver 2?
#332
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
#333
Thank you very much for the prompt replies. Am goin to sort it out to see if theres any available in the stores. Shouldnt be long to have my ver II fully hopped. Am still awaiting for the TRF shocks in stocked at our local store.
#335
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
Anyone interested in the Subaru Dunlop Cusco Body set that came with the kit? I've ordered an HPI 97 Honda Accord body set (this thing was almost as hard to find as Tamiya's PIAA/JACCS Accord body set) for this car so I don't need it.
The body set comes with NIP Wing, Side mirrors, and Decals, including the body of course
PM me if you're interested, I'm looking to sell it for cash or trade for another NIP body set...
The body set comes with NIP Wing, Side mirrors, and Decals, including the body of course
PM me if you're interested, I'm looking to sell it for cash or trade for another NIP body set...
#338
My ver2 had a slight impact last night and upon that i found that the screw of the king pin had come off and when i tried to screw it back on, the thread was loose. Now i had to use threadlock to secure it temporarily. Does anyone know the part number or hopup part for the front c-hub?
#339
What about the TB03 chassis made by 3 Racing, reason I ask is because at the track i raced at wore a hole near the motor(this happened with alot of cars) or a carbon reinforced chassis?
#340
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
#341
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
As for the Exotek stuff, they look real trick! I wouldn't mind holding out for a nice Exotek stuff. I've seen quite a few TC5 owners using their stuff...
#342
Does anyone know the part number (be it originial or hopup part) for the front c-hub of ver2?
#343
Tech Adept
F part plastic - 51293 ( left and right together)
Hopup , blue alu from 3racing TA05-IF16/LB
Note :same parts as for IFS
Personally I would reccommend plastic in front. My original IFS is as blue as possible but in front I went back to plastic parts ( except for bulkhead) and titanium for turnbuckles... I found alu to break or bend a lot easier
#344
Tech Adept
Let me post this here as the IFS thread is very slow these days - applies to V2 also , but with a 37T instead .
Is there any advantage (or otherwise) to using the wide pitch 36T pulley ( 49472 ) as a replacement for the standard white kit pulley. The wide pitch one , has every second tooth missing , and from the side it only has holes for the balls with a rim where the original pulley has other holes on the outer perimeter.
I bought it as a replacement for the rear , but the question applies to front or rear.
Thanks
Is there any advantage (or otherwise) to using the wide pitch 36T pulley ( 49472 ) as a replacement for the standard white kit pulley. The wide pitch one , has every second tooth missing , and from the side it only has holes for the balls with a rim where the original pulley has other holes on the outer perimeter.
I bought it as a replacement for the rear , but the question applies to front or rear.
Thanks
#345
The wide pitch pulley supposedly allows the drivetrain to be more efficient since less belt teeth are in direct contact with the pulley and hence less friction is generated, apparently they're only to be used in stock classes (10.5/13.5/17.5/21.5) because the extra torque generated by mod winds just ends up ripping the belts to shreds.