![]() |
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7835447)
SP Documentation is correct, i never say it's wrong.
as SP release the 422 Documentation, while Sp has not release the documentation for 528. incorrect, as the "12. SC Timing" is "0" (turned off) , the end RPM should remain the same as start rpm at 15000RPM or at "DMTS start RPM". and not to multiply with "15. SC Timing Punch" Jimmy, PM me your latest revision. :batman: |
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7835447)
the end RPM should remain the same as start rpm at 15000RPM or at "DMTS start RPM".
and not to multiply with "15. SC Timing Punch" Start rpm is the same of the end rpm when the DMTS setting is 0 and Sc is disabled, so you should have only the endbell motor timing working. We are talking with the info that we have, so we can have a bad information. But till we cannot read something of official i find hard follow something that tell me: this is wrong... because is wrong. Why is wrong and for which reason? I hope (and may be i'm not the only one) to be enlightened with facts not only reading that is wrong what we know :) Regards PS: i don't want to flame the forum, i just want to know how is working what i'm using. |
Originally Posted by altreyx
(Post 7835602)
disabling the SC doesn't delete the DMTS setting.
Originally Posted by altreyx
(Post 7835602)
Start rpm is the same of the end rpm when the DMTS setting is 0 and Sc is disabled,
|
instead of pointing out everyone elses errors, why don't you just go ahead and make your own chart and post, you've been asked several times to do this but still refuse, why?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by skypilot
(Post 7835773)
instead of pointing out everyone elses errors, why don't you just go ahead and make your own chart and post, you've been asked several times to do this but still refuse, why?
maybe this will help. |
wow seems like the same few people ALWAYS misinformed wow
|
Originally Posted by mr crum
(Post 7835807)
wow seems like the same few people ALWAYS misinformed wow
|
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7835805)
|
Originally Posted by skypilot
(Post 7836006)
no help what so ever.... but thanks for trying
|
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7835805)
Doing some test i can feel that the SC Punch is giving more or less acceleration on the stright, high levels of punch (#15: setting 5/6) car is pretty smooth, with low lvls my car is accelerating more fast, more heat and sometimes too much "wild"... but i can't see an extra speed or feeling to have an extra timing, and the speed seems the same. Is changing only the "intensity" of your acceleration. But may be i'm wrong :) Anyway thank you. |
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7835805)
Mike |
Originally Posted by altreyx
(Post 7836072)
Same as Skypilot... i can't understand. Why the SC Punch should be an "extra" timing, on that graphic i can see that, but i can't believe is working in that way.
Doing some test i can feel that the SC Punch is giving more or less acceleration on the stright, high levels of punch (#15: setting 5/6) car is pretty smooth, with low lvls my car is accelerating more fast, more heat and sometimes too much "wild"... but i can't see an extra speed or feeling to have an extra timing, and the speed seems the same. Is changing only the "intensity" of your acceleration. But may be i'm wrong :) Anyway thank you. Those are intend to have multi Curved Controller, many may not believe this, you can compare it's acceleration and temps when not using DMTS and SC. using fixed timing to max. and there is the differences. |
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7836550)
it's all dynamic : DMTS : SC BOOST : SC PUNCH/TorqueLimit
Those are intend to have multi Curved Controller, many may not believe this, you can compare it's acceleration and temps when not using DMTS and SC. using fixed timing to max. and there is the differences. :o |
Originally Posted by g26er
(Post 7836649)
Punch just controls how fast the timing (DMTS/Super Charger) is applied. (ex. 1 degree every 300RPM) It is NOT it's own timing setting. According to your chart, it's a 3rd phase of additional timing which it is not.
:o you can reach highest timing, if that's you think of SC punch is, your RPM wouldn't reach that high. EX: if you maxx out everything, add DMTS+#12SCT = 21°+8°=29° or with endbell timing +10°=39° that would not be good enough to achieve Highest timing, remember that Timing can be reach over 50°, that's why SP Could go really fast. And that's why the last timing must surely controlled with specific curved which is SuperCharge Punch / Torque Limit. to avoid excessive timing edge, and temps resulting Perfect Torque and shift. |
Originally Posted by irgo
(Post 7837033)
g26er, i don't want to argue but with these technology
you can reach highest timing, if that's you think of SC punch is, your RPM wouldn't reach that high. EX: if you maxx out everything, add DMTS+#12SCT = 21°+8°=29° or with endbell timing +10°=39° that would not be good enough to achieve Highest timing, remember that Timing can be reach over 50°, that's why SP Could go really fast. And that's why the last timing must surely controlled with specific curved which is SuperCharge Punch / Torque Limit. to avoid excessive timing edge, and temps resulting Perfect Torque and shift. :lol: There is no timing being added by "Punch" after the DMTS and Supercharger have been added. I said I was done with you before but this time I really am... Don't bother to reply you're going on "ignore". You're right okay... White towel I give up w/ you. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 06:45 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.