Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
The Speed Passion Thread >

The Speed Passion Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree57Likes

The Speed Passion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2010, 06:45 AM
  #2191  
Tech Regular
 
guinnes.s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by irgo
you might have more Puncher but look at this...

luckily you with SP GT v1.1 Build in

Allow us to run :
- Brushed Motor (Not Build in SP GT v2.0 software.)
- Brushless Motor Sensored
- Brushless Motor Sensoreless
- Incoming Slotless Brushless Motor Sensored
- Incoming Slotless Brushless Motor Sensoreless



Source :
http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...-racing-3.html
are you suggesting that i would be better not update to the new 2.0??
guinnes.s is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:47 AM
  #2192  
Tech Elite
 
sosidge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 4,438
Default

Originally Posted by guinnes.s
are you suggesting that i would be better not update to the new 2.0??
I wouldn't pay too much attention to Irgo's posts. He had a strange attitude to the Speed Passion stuff.

GT2.0 is undoubtedly a better (and faster) brushless speedo than the previous versions.
sosidge is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 06:54 AM
  #2193  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by abailey21
I hope my team of jobbers (Charlie, Solara, Crum and Cain Etc.) can help you if you have any questions.
Rocky King Here! Greatest Jobber of them all!
Cain is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:08 AM
  #2194  
Tech Fanatic
 
irgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 893
Default

Originally Posted by guinnes.s
are you suggesting that i would be better not update to the new 2.0??
I am not Suggesting,
i am only giving you an Option Mind. (benefit of those sp)
by not leaving SP GT 1.1 for nothing.
But if you are looking for better Perfomance,
sosidge was right, SP GT 2.0 is better choice,

but don't change SP GT 1.1 Pro with SP GT 2.0 LPF it's a waste.


Originally Posted by sosidge
I wouldn't pay too much attention to Irgo's posts. He had a strange attitude to the Speed Passion stuff.

GT2.0 is undoubtedly a better (and faster) brushless speedo than the previous versions.
behave sosidge.
irgo is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:12 AM
  #2195  
Tech Addict
 
Stein Tumert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norway (Oslo) / Germany (Hamburg)
Posts: 560
Default

Originally Posted by irgo
but don't change SP GT 1.1 Pro with SP GT 2.0 LPF it's a waste.
Why?
Stein Tumert is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:17 AM
  #2196  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
tfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,111
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by charlie_b
It all depends on what kind of dirt you will be running on. If it is packed clay, then you really don't have anything to worry about. But if it is dry, loose dirt, you might have some issues, but nothing compressed air won't fix.
Thanks -- the track is a damp clay mixture, but with a loose layer of dust/"fluff" on top much of the time. I race indoors on a 450' +/- lap length track, and except for practice, all heats are 5 min., with 6-min. mains. My motors tend to stay cool (for the reasons you mentioned), and the SP13.5R 'Ultrasportsman' I've been running was usually around 115F-125F after a run.
tfrahm is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 07:24 AM
  #2197  
Tech Fanatic
 
irgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 893
Default

Originally Posted by Stein Tumert
Why?
downgrade too much.
irgo is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 08:18 AM
  #2198  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by sosidge
I wouldn't pay too much attention to Irgo's posts. He had a strange attitude to the Speed Passion stuff.

GT2.0 is undoubtedly a better (and faster) brushless speedo than the previous versions.


+1... almost every new thing is better than the previous.
krat is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 09:49 AM
  #2199  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,342
Default

Originally Posted by irgo
I am not Suggesting,
i am only giving you an Option Mind. (benefit of those sp)
by not leaving SP GT 1.1 for nothing.
But if you are looking for better Perfomance,
sosidge was right, SP GT 2.0 is better choice,

but don't change SP GT 1.1 Pro with SP GT 2.0 LPF it's a waste.
My little team was running a 1.1 and a 2.0 LPF in identical vehicles, there was a significant difference in performance with spec motors. Now we have a 2.0 LPF and Pro in the same, don’t see any difference best we can tell. Just our experience in cars, not based on reading specification sheets, your mileage may vary as they say.

What’s a brushed motor, I’ve (gladly) forgotten?
Dave H is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 10:04 AM
  #2200  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 19
Default

For anybody that may have run it (not sure if it's out yet)

Would it be worth me buying the new GT2.1 Prostock speed control over the slightly older GT2.0 Pro Brushless ESC.

For touring car btw

I noticed Marc running the older 2.0 at the ETS.. was this just his prefered choise or not yet recieved the 2.1?

Cheers
PinkFloyd is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 10:07 AM
  #2201  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Scrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Plover, WI
Posts: 1,559
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Can anyone answer my previous question about gearing and timing for a 17.5 in TC.

Also I can't figure out if the v2.0 is 1s lipo capable for use in 12th scale.
Scrad is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 10:50 AM
  #2202  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
qcrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: IA Quad Cities
Posts: 432
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

I don't know what motor you are using but this seems to work well for me:
Track 80' x 48'
med grip
Trinity Nemesis 17.5 w/ 10* motor timing
4.21 FDR
110 firmware
25% drag brake, DRRS 8, brake force 100%, rev. force 100%, IBF 1, neutral range 1, AMTS 7 or 8 depending on motor temp. Motor is between 135-145 F
qcrc is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 11:08 AM
  #2203  
Tech Regular
 
dsyed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by PinkFloyd
For anybody that may have run it (not sure if it's out yet)

Would it be worth me buying the new GT2.1 Prostock speed control over the slightly older GT2.0 Pro Brushless ESC.

For touring car btw

I noticed Marc running the older 2.0 at the ETS.. was this just his prefered choise or not yet recieved the 2.1?

Cheers
i believe 2.1 pro-stock is designed for racing with stock motors only... marc r i believe races mod
dsyed1 is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 11:30 AM
  #2204  
Tech Fanatic
 
irgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 893
Default

Originally Posted by Dave H
My little team was running a 1.1 and a 2.0 LPF in identical vehicles, there was a significant difference in performance with spec motors. Now we have a 2.0 LPF and Pro in the same, don’t see any difference best we can tell. Just our experience in cars, not based on reading specification sheets, your mileage may vary as they say.

What’s a brushed motor, I’ve (gladly) forgotten?
well today not much people leave brushed motor,
such Dave H here...

also you will miss Hybrid Drive on SP GT v1.1

better updates it with LCD to Stock Software, if you can.

.... but it's all up to you all
irgo is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 12:19 PM
  #2205  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 256
Default

tested to run with 107 software in the last race ..
and I was lying alongside a top car with advnaces elc. esc. and the skillde not much .. on straight, it was probably me who had the upper hand.

not high temp on the motor or esc.

However, this driver was that it was broken ball in the car ... so I'm very happy with the new software .. running 107, DRRS: 6 AMTS: 22.50 Engine: speedpasson v. 3.0 17.5T

Caulking 4.35 Car: Xray T3
Zooberg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.