Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive) >

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree143Likes

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2012, 05:06 AM
  #2716  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Nico'
Hi,

in which condition to use n°3 dampers please? with low grip?

then, C07 carbon bumper is out of stock, is it the same as Tamiya TA-54089 please?

then the same question for AM16 out of stock, is it the same as Tamiya TA-84082 please?

Thanks,

Nico'
#3 dampers are under testing by our team drivers now still.
So the recommendations will be later.
Tamiya's carbon bumper is suitable.
TA-84082 is not the same but is suitable.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:18 AM
  #2717  
Tech Adept
 
Nico''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
#3 dampers are under testing by our team drivers now still.
So the recommendations will be later.
Tamiya's carbon bumper is suitable.
TA-84082 is not the same but is suitable.
Thanks Oleg,

when will be C01 EX ( and EX kit) available again please?

Thanks,

Nico'
Nico' is offline  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:57 AM
  #2718  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Nico'
Thanks Oleg,

when will be C01 EX ( and EX kit) available again please?

Thanks,

Nico'
Next week.. I hope.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:39 PM
  #2719  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 00000
Posts: 4,259
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Excited to start exercising my A700's again!
MDawson is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 12:36 AM
  #2720  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Banjarmasin South Borneo
Posts: 11
Default

I hope it will be available in asia, also for the sparepart..
uranghanyar is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:28 AM
  #2721  
Tech Initiate
 
FrenchFries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
1. Please try this setup on your track first.
2. Almost all touring cars have front suspension actually softer than rear.
Harder springs and oil are compensated by the shorter operating
leverage force application for the shocks on the front suspension of all others touring
cars.
3. Please use our standard setup as initial.
Hi OLEG..

The A700 is Fantastic...

But Could explain more details about your statement No.2 .... its make me confused....in what condition the front of all touring car suspension was softer than rear... ??

Tks Before....
FrenchFries is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 08:30 AM
  #2722  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchFries
...
But Could explain more details about your statement No.2 .... its make me confused....in what condition the front of all touring car suspension was softer than rear.....
It means that if you put 200 (for example) grams weight on the front end of the car and the same 200 grams weight on the rear end of the car the front ride height decreases more than rear ride height. This is the usual thing for current touring cars at the most common conditions.

Last edited by Oleg Babich; 12-17-2012 at 09:03 AM.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:00 PM
  #2723  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Magnet Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,075
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchFries
The A700 is Fantastic...

But Could explain more details about your statement No.2 .... its make me confused....in what condition the front of all touring car suspension was softer than rear... ??

Tks Before....
FrenchFries,

Next time you are at the track ask your fellow racers if you can push on the front and back of their cars to feel the suspension stiffness. You will notice that most cars will feel softer in the front than in the rear. The confusion comes because the front of the car typically uses springs that are stiffer relative than the rear ! As Oleg explained, the reason the effective spring rate is opposite ( front is actually softer ) is because the leverage point makes the effective spring rate softer in the front. To explain this, On "typical" touring rc cars the leverage point is different on the front vs the back because the shock/spring assembly is mounted further in towards the centerline of the car (only in the front ) to allow the front wheels to steer ( left and right ) and not rub against the shock/spring assembly. The rear shock/spring assembly is typically mounted further out than the front and will not rub because we use toe out in the rear which also doesn't "steer". Hope that helps explain it !

Jake D.

Last edited by Magnet Top; 12-17-2012 at 02:19 PM.
Magnet Top is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:22 PM
  #2724  
Tech Regular
 
Adam B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Detroit, Mi
Posts: 412
Default

I seen one of these cars run and school a bunch of racers this weekend. Very impressive.
Adam B is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 06:18 PM
  #2725  
Tech Initiate
 
FrenchFries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Oleg Babich
It means that if you put 200 (for example) grams weight on the front end of the car and the same 200 grams weight on the rear end of the car the front ride height decreases more than rear ride height. This is the usual thing for current touring cars at the most common conditions.
I see..
tks alots Oleg.....
FrenchFries is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 06:20 PM
  #2726  
Tech Initiate
 
FrenchFries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Magnet Top
FrenchFries,

Next time you are at the track ask your fellow racers if you can push on the front and back of their cars to feel the suspension stiffness. You will notice that most cars will feel softer in the front than in the rear. The confusion comes because the front of the car typically uses springs that are stiffer relative than the rear ! As Oleg explained, the reason the effective spring rate is opposite ( front is actually softer ) is because the leverage point makes the effective spring rate softer in the front. To explain this, On "typical" touring rc cars the leverage point is different on the front vs the back because the shock/spring assembly is mounted further in towards the centerline of the car (only in the front ) to allow the front wheels to steer ( left and right ) and not rub against the shock/spring assembly. The rear shock/spring assembly is typically mounted further out than the front and will not rub because we use toe out in the rear which also doesn't "steer". Hope that helps explain it !

Jake D.
Enlightening.....

Tks alot Jake....

Last edited by FrenchFries; 12-17-2012 at 06:36 PM.
FrenchFries is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 09:04 PM
  #2727  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Magnet Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,075
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

For what its worth.

The new kits come with new P01/P02 which are considerably stronger / tighter which allows them to withstand impact without separating from each other. Also, they appear to snap onto ST03 ( the ball stud ) with more force. I found that they were so tight that it restricted movement of the suspension. Thankfully the solution is VERY easy. I just spun ST03 on my "Dremel" tool ( rotary hobby tool ) which allowed me to polish the balls with 400 grit sand paper. It didnt' take much all to make them free, so maybe 600 grit would be better. I think it was well worth it because it made the suspension parts move freely.

Cheers,

Jake D.
Magnet Top is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 09:07 PM
  #2728  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 00000
Posts: 4,259
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Magnet Top
For what its worth.

The new kits come with new P01/P02 which are considerably stronger / tighter which allows them to withstand impact without separating from each other. Also, they appear to snap onto ST03 ( the ball stud ) with more force. I found that they were so tight that it restricted movement of the suspension. Thankfully the solution is VERY easy. I just spun ST03 on my "Dremel" tool ( rotary hobby tool ) which allowed me to polish the balls with 400 grit sand paper. It didnt' take much all to make them free, so maybe 600 grit would be better. I think it was well worth it because it made the suspension parts move freely.

Cheers,

Jake D.
You can also get ball joint reamer from most r/c heli stores that will make quick work of precise fit.
MDawson is offline  
Old 12-17-2012, 09:11 PM
  #2729  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Magnet Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,075
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MDawson
You can also get ball joint reamer from most r/c heli stores that will make quick work of precise fit.
Interesting, I didn't know something like that is available , but in this case, I really think it is such a slight amount of polishing of the ball that anything over just a quick spin of ST03 using a rotary tool with fine grit sandpaper would be overkill.

Jake D.
Magnet Top is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 03:46 AM
  #2730  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
hana166's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 682
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Simply cannot beat a ball joint reamer. Easy and it allows you to adjust it super precise then you can do all the joints the same in a minute. Its a regular tool for heli guys
hana166 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.