Tekin RS ESC sensored
#9979
Tech Elite
iTrader: (29)
I had the same problem, what i did was completlly delete any older version tekin files, ALL of em, started fresh, after getting files un-zipped, etc... re-started computer, and that did it for me, i actually found this advise in this thread, several pages back.... hope that helps....
tommy
tommy
#9980
Tech Apprentice
I'd also make sure to remove all old dll files. The standard Windows program uninstaller may not do a good job. I use http://www.revouninstaller.com/ instead. Very good at cleaning up all old files.
#9982
One more question, what happens if the turbo is set prior to all the timing boost being added? Does it get suddenly added in the middle or wait until the turbo delay after the highest RPM is set? I was having a problem this weekend with the turbo not kicking in until the middle of the straight despite having it set to .2 (and it wasn't kicking in for at least half a second).
#9983
Great explanation. Thank you! So what is the start RPM and end RPM used to determine? Is the timing boost added linear to that range? So for example if the timing boost is set to 50 is the timing boost 0 at the start RPM and 50 at the end RPM (and 25 somewhere in the middle)?
#9984
guys, not trying to be an ass. I know that this thread is moving real fast, but you need to look back through the thread for answers. if everyone just keeps asking question when the answer is there, this thread will soon become useless.
1. timing boost starts at "start rpm" and ends at "end RPM"
2. turbo boost starts after you hit full throttle for the "delay" length of time
3. ramp only affects turbo.
4. yes timing boost and turbo boost can overlap.
5. yes you can set delay to 0.
all confirmed by Randy and/or Jim in the last 30 or so pages
1. timing boost starts at "start rpm" and ends at "end RPM"
2. turbo boost starts after you hit full throttle for the "delay" length of time
3. ramp only affects turbo.
4. yes timing boost and turbo boost can overlap.
5. yes you can set delay to 0.
all confirmed by Randy and/or Jim in the last 30 or so pages
#9985
From what Randy's already explained, timing boost is added linearly through the RPM range you specify.
Turbo is now ramped at a rate you specify after the time delay elapses once you reach full throttle.
Taking both of these things into account, it is possible to have overlap, where you'll end up adding timing faster than ideal.
If you had 200 sorted, you'll now need to get your start and end RPM sorted so that your boost timing is completed, or nearly completed before Turbo comes in. With the added acceleration of the new adjustments, this should put your turbo delay roughly the same as you ran in 200, and maybe .1sec quicker.
However, since you can now add much more boost than we had available previously, I suspect the majority of folks running carpet TC won't need turbo at all. For example, my previous setup I ran 20 Boost and Max Turbo. For the same amount of timing, I can no set up my car to run [just about] all that timing in Boost.
I'm spending all day Wednesday tuning/tweaking, and I'll post my results after then.
Turbo is now ramped at a rate you specify after the time delay elapses once you reach full throttle.
Taking both of these things into account, it is possible to have overlap, where you'll end up adding timing faster than ideal.
If you had 200 sorted, you'll now need to get your start and end RPM sorted so that your boost timing is completed, or nearly completed before Turbo comes in. With the added acceleration of the new adjustments, this should put your turbo delay roughly the same as you ran in 200, and maybe .1sec quicker.
However, since you can now add much more boost than we had available previously, I suspect the majority of folks running carpet TC won't need turbo at all. For example, my previous setup I ran 20 Boost and Max Turbo. For the same amount of timing, I can no set up my car to run [just about] all that timing in Boost.
I'm spending all day Wednesday tuning/tweaking, and I'll post my results after then.
#9986
Tech Rookie
21.5 VTA
Hey guys, I was wondering if anyone has come up with a 21.5 VTA set-up yet. I've read about the last 60 pages and don't remember seeing a starting point set-up for a 21.5.
#9990
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
Hello,
I installed the new program recently and noticed that when I view current versions, it has no option for v203. Highest it shows is v199. But I have all the features of v203 available for use...ramp, end/start rpm adjustment etc. Is this a problem? A glitch of sorts, or user error? I have it installed on my netbook, vista 32bit. I deleted the older version before installing, then installed the new version by using .bat first, then .exe and it still says I'm on 199.
I have had some time to practice indoors with the new program in 17.5 and 13.5 in TC. I really like the end/start setting. Really smooths out the throttle. But relating back to my original question, I tried out some the suggested settings by others on here and didn't really like it. No low end torque and way too much heat. After testing, the settings and FDR I settled with are quite a bit different. Maybe this is because I'm seeing 199 as my version number?
Thanks in advance
I installed the new program recently and noticed that when I view current versions, it has no option for v203. Highest it shows is v199. But I have all the features of v203 available for use...ramp, end/start rpm adjustment etc. Is this a problem? A glitch of sorts, or user error? I have it installed on my netbook, vista 32bit. I deleted the older version before installing, then installed the new version by using .bat first, then .exe and it still says I'm on 199.
I have had some time to practice indoors with the new program in 17.5 and 13.5 in TC. I really like the end/start setting. Really smooths out the throttle. But relating back to my original question, I tried out some the suggested settings by others on here and didn't really like it. No low end torque and way too much heat. After testing, the settings and FDR I settled with are quite a bit different. Maybe this is because I'm seeing 199 as my version number?
Thanks in advance