Tamiya mini cooper
I recently purchased a tamiya rtr m03 mini-cooper set. I noticed that my body seems to sit pretty high compared to others that I've seen run. Are there huge differences in companys and models currently out there? What does everyone recommend for a replacement if I wanted to stick with the old school cooper body?
Thanks !!
Jeff
Thanks !!
Jeff
http://www.tamiyausa.com/product/ite...oduct-id=50795
It will! I did the same thing on my older Mini Cooper body, to fit 60D tires. Alot of dremmel use to eliminate tire rub. I also forgot to mention that the RTR Mini body that you have has a chrome plated plastic front grille & side mirrors. The newer body doesn't have any of those.
I recently purchased a tamiya rtr m03 mini-cooper set. I noticed that my body seems to sit pretty high compared to others that I've seen run. Are there huge differences in companys and models currently out there? What does everyone recommend for a replacement if I wanted to stick with the old school cooper body?
Thanks !!
Jeff
Thanks !!
Jeff
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 53
From: Never Never Land
Been reading the thread starting from when the M03 was the top mini.
With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?
Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?
I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?
Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?
I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
Hi guys,
Just small question ... for you who are racing brushed motors on Lipo's on yours M03's and M05's, did you noted a HUGE change in motor wear when went from NiMH to LIPO ?, i mean, was like killing motors just because of the Lipo ?, i need really in depth information about this ...
thanks a lot,
Pat
Just small question ... for you who are racing brushed motors on Lipo's on yours M03's and M05's, did you noted a HUGE change in motor wear when went from NiMH to LIPO ?, i mean, was like killing motors just because of the Lipo ?, i need really in depth information about this ...
thanks a lot,
Pat
Been reading the thread starting from when the M03 was the top mini.
With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?
Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?
I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?
Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?
I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
Last edited by M03Racer; 07-01-2010 at 06:38 PM.
M03racer, it's not really a suspension issue, since I had already upgraded to the tamiya oil shocks with short springs. The car can't go much lower without major scraping. The RTR came with much smaller diameter wheel/tire combo than the aftermarket ones. Because of this difference in diameter the body was cutout and made to fit a smaller wheel. In addition to this the body itself just seemed taller in general compared t others I've seen.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,857
Hi, for the weight question, best way would be to do testing on your particular track and look at the stopwatch to see if it is better to go for a lighter or heavier car and what best weight distribution would be.
My M05 is around 1,250 - 1,280grms, depending on the race condition. I've seen 1,380gms M05s go faster.
Hope that helps.
My M05 is around 1,250 - 1,280grms, depending on the race condition. I've seen 1,380gms M05s go faster.
Hope that helps.
M03racer, it's not really a suspension issue, since I had already upgraded to the tamiya oil shocks with short springs. The car can't go much lower without major scraping. The RTR came with much smaller diameter wheel/tire combo than the aftermarket ones. Because of this difference in diameter the body was cutout and made to fit a smaller wheel. In addition to this the body itself just seemed taller in general compared t others I've seen.
m03racer, here are a few quick pics. As you can see I needed to remove a decent amount of body behind the front wheel and infront of the rear to get the body down over the tires. I needed to also mount it up higher to eliminate too much rubbing on the tires.
You can also see the difference in diameter in the one pic as well. This body appears to have been cut for the smaller box stock tires?
Before you ask, I'm currently running Tamiya S-Grips in the rear and M-Grips in the front.
You can also see the difference in diameter in the one pic as well. This body appears to have been cut for the smaller box stock tires?
Before you ask, I'm currently running Tamiya S-Grips in the rear and M-Grips in the front.



295Likes