Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010 | 02:57 PM
  #12691  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by Skitee
Yes the 4000 fits



What is the best lipo for the mini?
higbo is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:00 PM
  #12692  
gtfour93's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by shortbus
I recently purchased a tamiya rtr m03 mini-cooper set. I noticed that my body seems to sit pretty high compared to others that I've seen run. Are there huge differences in companys and models currently out there? What does everyone recommend for a replacement if I wanted to stick with the old school cooper body?

Thanks !!

Jeff
The RTR Mini Cooper bodies are from the original body mold. The same bodies that came with the M-01 chassis (58149 & 58163). They are slightly narrower, compared to the current Mini Cooper bodies. Item #50795 is the new and much wider Mini Cooper body.
gtfour93 is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:01 PM
  #12693  
Skitee's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 745
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Default

like I said this is a new Rocket Pack range
Skitee is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:02 PM
  #12694  
shortbus's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Default

so which newer cooper bodies would be worth a try (model #'s)? i'm still talking the older rover style and not the modern one.
shortbus is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:12 PM
  #12695  
gtfour93's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by shortbus
so which newer cooper bodies would be worth a try (model #'s)? i'm still talking the older rover style and not the modern one.
Check you local hobby stores as well for stock.
http://www.tamiyausa.com/product/ite...oduct-id=50795
gtfour93 is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:16 PM
  #12696  
shortbus's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Default

awesome - i read your original post back to me wrong. hopefully this will solve the wheel well issues I was having with this RTR body. I nearly had to lack most of the well away to fit the new tire/rims.
shortbus is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:23 PM
  #12697  
gtfour93's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Default Mini Cooper body

It will! I did the same thing on my older Mini Cooper body, to fit 60D tires. Alot of dremmel use to eliminate tire rub. I also forgot to mention that the RTR Mini body that you have has a chrome plated plastic front grille & side mirrors. The newer body doesn't have any of those.
gtfour93 is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:23 PM
  #12698  
M03Racer's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,190
From: Great Lakes
Default

Originally Posted by shortbus
I recently purchased a tamiya rtr m03 mini-cooper set. I noticed that my body seems to sit pretty high compared to others that I've seen run. Are there huge differences in companys and models currently out there? What does everyone recommend for a replacement if I wanted to stick with the old school cooper body?

Thanks !!

Jeff
You know before you go and buy a different body why don't you try to lower the suspension with shorter springs. I had the same issue where my body was a tad too high and I used shorter springs and now the car and the body sits just right.
M03Racer is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:23 PM
  #12699  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 53
From: Never Never Land
Default

Been reading the thread starting from when the M03 was the top mini.

With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?

Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?

I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
TRF512 is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:29 PM
  #12700  
M03Racer's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,190
From: Great Lakes
Default

Originally Posted by Tabushi
Hi guys,

Just small question ... for you who are racing brushed motors on Lipo's on yours M03's and M05's, did you noted a HUGE change in motor wear when went from NiMH to LIPO ?, i mean, was like killing motors just because of the Lipo ?, i need really in depth information about this ...

thanks a lot,

Pat
Its nothing like that you just get more run time it will not make to motor go faster and wear out. LiPo's just last longer then a NiMh battery that's all just stay with the 7.2v configuration don't do the 12.5V or bigger don't need it, besides todays NiMh can keep up with LiPo's if you have one that's 5000Mah or higher.
M03Racer is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #12701  
M03Racer's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,190
From: Great Lakes
Default

Originally Posted by TRF512
Been reading the thread starting from when the M03 was the top mini.

With the M05, do you still find the need to weigh the battery with lead flashings?

Does the 60:40 weight distribution still apply and is it still necessary? Assuming it's possible, will a 65:35 or even 70:30 ratio be better or bad?

I can use a mini servo at the back and move the 22gram transponder forward to where the external motor heatsink would normally be located, PLUS put lead weight on the bumper PLUS use the heavy gear shafts to (very nearly) reach the 70:30 ratio.
I don't have an M05 but I drove one and it does seem to be better balanced since they put the servo in the middle of the chassis instead of right on top of the motor in the front like the M03. The guy who had it didn't have any weights on the car just lowered the car a lot and it handled very nice. I have three M03's (M03M, M03R and a M03) and I also have an M04 I've been thinking of getting an M05 lately ever since I drove one. It seems to be a little better designed then the M03 I hate to say this cause I'm a big M03 fan but I just think that the M05 is a tad better.

Last edited by M03Racer; 07-01-2010 at 06:38 PM.
M03Racer is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #12702  
shortbus's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Default

M03racer, it's not really a suspension issue, since I had already upgraded to the tamiya oil shocks with short springs. The car can't go much lower without major scraping. The RTR came with much smaller diameter wheel/tire combo than the aftermarket ones. Because of this difference in diameter the body was cutout and made to fit a smaller wheel. In addition to this the body itself just seemed taller in general compared t others I've seen.
shortbus is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 05:33 PM
  #12703  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,857
Default

Hi, for the weight question, best way would be to do testing on your particular track and look at the stopwatch to see if it is better to go for a lighter or heavier car and what best weight distribution would be.

My M05 is around 1,250 - 1,280grms, depending on the race condition. I've seen 1,380gms M05s go faster.

Hope that helps.
rccartips is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 06:40 PM
  #12704  
M03Racer's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,190
From: Great Lakes
Default

Originally Posted by shortbus
M03racer, it's not really a suspension issue, since I had already upgraded to the tamiya oil shocks with short springs. The car can't go much lower without major scraping. The RTR came with much smaller diameter wheel/tire combo than the aftermarket ones. Because of this difference in diameter the body was cutout and made to fit a smaller wheel. In addition to this the body itself just seemed taller in general compared t others I've seen.
Please post a pic so we see what you mean. Thanks
M03Racer is offline  
Old 07-01-2010 | 09:02 PM
  #12705  
shortbus's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
Default

m03racer, here are a few quick pics. As you can see I needed to remove a decent amount of body behind the front wheel and infront of the rear to get the body down over the tires. I needed to also mount it up higher to eliminate too much rubbing on the tires.

You can also see the difference in diameter in the one pic as well. This body appears to have been cut for the smaller box stock tires?

Before you ask, I'm currently running Tamiya S-Grips in the rear and M-Grips in the front.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya mini cooper-front.gif   Tamiya mini cooper-side.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-wheel_difference.jpg  
shortbus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.