Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2009 | 10:11 PM
  #9331  
jonest's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,142
From: Johor, Malaysia
Default

Hi Tony,

Great review there and will definitely follow it till the end.

Noticed that you installed the rear upper link on the lower hole of the rear knuckle. Tot normally we would install it on the upper hole instead.. Mind explaining the handling effect?

Thanks.

jonest is offline  
Old 06-29-2009 | 10:22 PM
  #9332  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Because that's what the instructions said..

For the intial build it was done as per kit in that regard.
tony gray is offline  
Old 06-29-2009 | 10:32 PM
  #9333  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

The thing about bump steer in an M chassis is that since it's there, you may as well make it work for you. I tend to run my car VERY low so it's not as much of an issue, but I do try to make it advantageous.

EG: I set my toe to be almost completely neutral at ride height. So, if the car is rolling along a straight, the wheels are dead ahead and providing minimum resistance. When I come off the throttle to enter a corner, the wheels toe in a little (which in theory is a bad thing) and this sets up the outside wheel for a little more of an aggressive posture and maybe a little extra bite. Exiting a corner under full throttle, the wheels will return to neutral or toe out a little. I find this helps snap the car into the proper line for exit.

I suppose toe in at the entrance to a corner could be a bad thing if you're dealing with a traction roll problem, but if you remember the cardinal rule of minis "Slide the front, stick the rear" it shouldn't be an issue.

Of course, all of my tuning is based on running on an ultra smooth, carpeted track, so it may not apply to all situations. I suppose the other factor that may make all of my advice moot is that there is so much slop in the steering anyway that toe is the least of my worries.

Jim
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 12:37 AM
  #9334  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Well, check out rc-mini now.



I've added on some interesting photo comparisons between some 03 and 05 parts.. Have a look.
tony gray is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 01:00 AM
  #9335  
caltek1's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,422
Default

MO5 front alloy knuckle is the same dimensions as the MO3R alloy front knuckle and uses the same 1050 bearing, for those that are interested.

TFG,

Thank you for the build report, might commence mine soon. Great job as usual. Are you using the tech racing wheel hexes on your MO3?

Regards,

Calvin.
caltek1 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 01:58 AM
  #9336  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

The M05 runs pretty much the same as the M03. I ran against one of our fast guys, and the lap times didn't differ by much. However, this chassis resists traction rolling much better, so there is potential there if you can make use of the extra front grip that can be added.

Like I said before, there are other things this chassis is capable like the separate rear lower suspension block, and compatibility with a modern ball diff. It may be the same now, but there is more potential to be unleashed.

Tony, thanks for the detailed build blog!
redbones is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:16 AM
  #9337  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
redbones is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 03:09 AM
  #9338  
jonest's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,142
From: Johor, Malaysia
Default

Noticed that the "L" version has the rear shock installed in front of the tires....
jonest is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 07:34 AM
  #9339  
axle182's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,785
From: Calgary, Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by jonest
Hi Tony,

Great review there and will definitely follow it till the end.

Noticed that you installed the rear upper link on the lower hole of the rear knuckle. Tot normally we would install it on the upper hole instead.. Mind explaining the handling effect?

Thanks.
Theory behind the upper/lower holes, if you use the upper hole you get more camber gain, meaning as the suspension rises (the wheel rises) the camber increases more than the lower hole. Can give you more grip, to a certain point. Its something to play with if you have a tonne of side bit, and traction roll alot. Ive always used the upper hole, and had the rear as low as possible. Its changing your roll centre, ive seen a website which describes the theory at length. If i find it ill post it!
axle182 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 07:48 AM
  #9340  
niznai's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,972
From: All over the place
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing
.....
When I come off the throttle to enter a corner, the wheels toe in a little
.....
Jim
I don't think so.

If your steering/suspension allows that much slop. then I think you will notice that under power the wheels toe in and rolling off power they will toe out (front wheel drive, right?).

This is easy to check. Push your car by hand to replicate rolling off throttle (car pushes the wheels not wheels pull the car) and you will see the wheels toe out instantly.

Next, turn radio and car on, hold the car so it can not drive away and apply throttle forward (this is to replicate car being pulled by wheels under normal throttle). You will see the front wheels toe in instantly.

Good luck.
niznai is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 11:27 AM
  #9341  
Kail's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 902
Default

Had my first shakedown of the car today at the track. Car is easier to drive than the M03 definitely. Posted modest laptimes too. About 0.1s faster than my M03 which had a good setup on the track. Things are looking good.
Kail is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 01:43 PM
  #9342  
caltek1's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,422
Default

Good to hear Kail. Was that using the box stock setup?

Regards,

Calvin.
caltek1 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:06 PM
  #9343  
Phat-Boy's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 614
From: Gardena , Ca
Default

m05 pro manual http://www.tamiya.com/japan/download...8443m05pro.pdf
Phat-Boy is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:22 PM
  #9344  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Originally Posted by Kail
Had my first shakedown of the car today at the track. Car is easier to drive than the M03 definitely. Posted modest laptimes too. About 0.1s faster than my M03 which had a good setup on the track. Things are looking good.
Hey Leonard, good to hear you can get yours out on the track. I'd like to do the same but rain, wind, thunder and lightning is the weather here at the moment. With no letup expected until next week!
I'll get some indoor action with our car tonight but that wont tell us much....

I should fly up to Sing to test..
tony gray is offline  
Old 06-30-2009 | 04:58 PM
  #9345  
niznai's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,972
From: All over the place
Default

Tony, where is your home track in Melbourne?
niznai is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.