BMI's DB12R
#1389
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
FYI, both pairs of fronts I sent you are brand new. The rears on the car are a little beat up but will be fine for practice. The other set of rears are brand new.
Do not retrue them...they are right at the size you want 1.7F and 1.75R. Any pattern on the tire will be gone in 1 min of running.
#1392
Tech Lord
iTrader: (13)
I want to let all of you guys know, we are cutting a wide range of thicknesses of flex plates right now and every set we have is measured with a micrometer and seperated in .002 increments. If you feel that you want to try certain thicknesses, please feel free to let me know. I have them seperated and chances are i have the set you are looking for. I want to have the option open for you. They range from .061-.073 and we have about 5 variations in small increments to allow you to really fine tune.
This is for that little change you may feel will work for your track. If any of you have any questions on them feel free to ask away.
This is for that little change you may feel will work for your track. If any of you have any questions on them feel free to ask away.
#1394
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
There is no need to shim anything to compensate for flex plate changes. The diffrence between the thickest and thinnest flex plate is ~.015". That's not a lot dimensionally as far as the chassis structure is concered.
There is an intentional mis-match in the height of the front flex plate moutning posts and the rear pivot ball height. The first prototype had the flex plate level and it was too soft in spring rate off center. The 2nd prototype had the front flex plate mounts lower than the pivot balls in order to preload the flex plates. This made the pod center better and made the car have more steering.
This is one of the areas where Jason instincts were dead on. The guy just has a gift for knowing what right and wrong mechanically in just about everything.
#1395