3racing Cero Ultra V1 & V2
#46
Tech Elite
I think we are seeing final verification of production ready parts in the in vids on Facebook. Most testing should be done now.
#47
Tech Elite
Look at the size of the pinion in this image
#48
Tech Elite
I've been eyeball'n this chassis a lot and it's very interesting how much focus appears to be placed on flex characteristics. The main plate is 100% symmetrical (like for real)... the front pulley is offset to the right to allow the servo to be mounted dead centre with rear diff dead centre. Plus, if you are careful to mount your electronics so that they don't touch the outer chassis rail and do the same with the battery by placing pads in the machined areas, you could simulate a full floating electrics setup like the ones seen from RCMaker and Kyosho but without raising the CG as much.
#49
I've been eyeball'n this chassis a lot and it's very interesting how much focus appears to be placed on flex characteristics. The main plate is 100% symmetrical (like for real)... the front pulley is offset to the right to allow the servo to be mounted dead centre with rear diff dead centre. Plus, if you are careful to mount your electronics so that they don't touch the outer chassis rail and do the same with the battery by placing pads in the machined areas, you could simulate a full floating electrics setup like the ones seen from RCMaker and Kyosho but without raising the CG as much.
If you move the slots in closer to the pod though you can actually benefit by freeing the drivetrain up a bit.
Virtually run the motor/spur plate flat helping keep the motor more static then dynamic as the chassis flexes.
Also material fatigue with the sides that close I think is gonna be a factor.
But Im not knocking the car at all, I still hope to see it bring new faces to some racing if they can keep it in the 3Racing type of pricing.
#50
Tech Elite
The "Krazed Builds" chassis style idea is interesting.. looks like you could almost convert the Cero plate with a Dremel cutoff wheel pretty quick without weakening it much (not that I'll try that). This chassis has jumped to the top of my new toy wanted list.
#51
Def able to add rear bite and gain some mid forward flex for steering. Got my own interests peaked now
#52
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
Hmmm Symmetrical Flex .... thats a great idea lol.
If you move the slots in closer to the pod though you can actually benefit by freeing the drivetrain up a bit.
Virtually run the motor/spur plate flat helping keep the motor more static then dynamic as the chassis flexes.
Also material fatigue with the sides that close I think is gonna be a factor.
But Im not knocking the car at all, I still hope to see it bring new faces to some racing if they can keep it in the 3Racing type of pricing.
If you move the slots in closer to the pod though you can actually benefit by freeing the drivetrain up a bit.
Virtually run the motor/spur plate flat helping keep the motor more static then dynamic as the chassis flexes.
Also material fatigue with the sides that close I think is gonna be a factor.
But Im not knocking the car at all, I still hope to see it bring new faces to some racing if they can keep it in the 3Racing type of pricing.
#53
Wow, I've got 2 2k18s that I've been racing, and now I'll finally have a reason to upgrade potentially, and a reason to not upgrade to the 21, lol.
#54
I've been eyeball'n this chassis a lot and it's very interesting how much focus appears to be placed on flex characteristics. The main plate is 100% symmetrical (like for real)... the front pulley is offset to the right to allow the servo to be mounted dead centre with rear diff dead centre. Plus, if you are careful to mount your electronics so that they don't touch the outer chassis rail and do the same with the battery by placing pads in the machined areas, you could simulate a full floating electrics setup like the ones seen from RCMaker and Kyosho but without raising the CG as much.
#55
Tech Elite
#56
#57
Tech Elite
I was wondering about that too - not sure of any reason for it to be that way.
#58
Probably belt length.
#59
Tech Regular
#60
most definitely not...