Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC5 >

Team Associated TC5

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Associated TC5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2007, 08:11 PM
  #3811  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (26)
 
stulec52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,216
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by G2B Anthony
what's your set up? or just the instruction manual set up?
I was afraid someone would ask that !
I was handed the car at the track, I put a set of CS27s on it, a CO27 T Bang stock motor in it, charged my cells and raced.
I didn't touch the setup all night.
So, I couldn't say what it was, but I can say that the car worked great, so it is possible to dial in a setup that worked for me on that surface.

The thing that impressed me the most though was right from putting the car on the track the first lap I knew it was going to be good.
stulec52 is offline  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:28 PM
  #3812  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brazil
Posts: 40
Default

Just to share my setup for everyone , the car was awesome I made TQ and won the first race for the TC5 here in Brazil ;



LOW TO MEDIUM TRACTION ASPHALT OPEN LARGE TRACK - WITH HAND OUT TIRES


RIDE HEIGHT 5,5 REAR 5,0 FRONT

CAMBER 1,5 ALL

CASTER 4 DEG

TOE IN REAR 2,5 TOTAL (REAR HUB 0,5)

FRONT TOE 0

HEX SPACING - NO

WHEEL BASE REAR 1MM FRONT 2 MM

STEERING LINK 1 B

BUMB STEER - NO


SPOOL ON FRONT

REAR DIFF 1/8 OUT

CAM HOLDER A FRONT MID HIGH - REAR MID HIGH

SHOCK OIL 30 WT PISTON # 1 ALL AROUND

REBOUND - NO

FRONT SPRING ASSOC BLUE

REAR SPRING ASSOC SILVER

SHOCK POSITION FRONT 3 B

SHOCK POSITION REAR 3 B

CAMBER LINK REAR 3 A WITH 2MM SHIMS

CAMBER LINK FRONT 3


REAR SUSPENSION MOUNTS

FWD ARM MOUNT 2 A

NO SHIMS


RWD ARM MOUNTS 2 A

WITH 2 DEG SHIMS



FRONT SUSPENSION MOUNTS

FWD ARM MOUNT 1 A

NO SHIMS


RWD ARM MOUNTS 2 A

NO SHIMS



ANTI ROLL BAR 1,25 MM
JUST ON REAR


NO ANTI ROLL BAR ON FRONT



CHASSIS AND TOP PLATE ITF (without o-rings/all screws tight on top deck)

MOTOR X11 3.5

GEAR 87/21

SPEED SPHERE TC - VALUES 2 - 4 - 0 - 0

BODY STRATUS 3.0


5 CELLS RWD - ON BACK POSITION


GREAT CAR - Congratulations TEAM ASSOCIATED


Fabian Kaloustian

TEAM ASSOCIATED - REEDY - LRP - JACO
Fabian K is offline  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:52 PM
  #3813  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 121
Default

I have changed the front drive belt to BD one, result is very smooth and very flexible for the belt tension choice. Try Try

Besides, does anyone tried use 4 O-ring to the upper deck rear screw position? Any different.
G2B Anthony is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 01:04 AM
  #3814  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
zacabrandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 913
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

I dont understand why everyone is changing the belts on this car? The belts I recieved with it are fantastic, super strong, smooth and have plenty of flex and adjustment.

I run mod, 19T, and find them to be just fine, am I missing something here?

Cheers
Aaron
zacabrandy is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 03:03 AM
  #3815  
Tech Master
 
ooliganRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under that rock you just kicked over!!!!
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by DOTMAN
I've had one for almost two-months...just haven't built it. Been waiting for parts and the spool and the one-way. I just got the ITF chassis. Now that Tamiya season is over...gonna start building it. I should have it on the track by next weekend. Maybe someday, there will even be a spool for it
titanium racing make one.

also precision rc has one way units on there site
ooliganRC is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 07:45 AM
  #3816  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 1,172
Trader Rating: 16 (94%+)
Default

Originally Posted by zacabrandy
I dont understand why everyone is changing the belts on this car? The belts I recieved with it are fantastic, super strong, smooth and have plenty of flex and adjustment.

Cheers
Aaron
With a mod or 19T motor, the belt should be fine. The stock belt is slightly rigid and does not stretch much. In stock racing I can see where a looser, slightly more pliable belt could be beneficial.

I've been running my TC5 for about 8-weeks now, 13.5 BL, and the belts don't seem to have loosened up much at all.
kn7671 is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 08:25 AM
  #3817  
Tech Adept
 
tcfree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 117
Default

The belts will not loosen up if any @ all, the yokomo/bomber 1 is made from a diffrent material so it flex's more, and as for class of racing either it be 27t 19t or a mod with lipo u still want a free/smooth drive train, the belt change does make a diffrence

Ste.
tcfree is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 08:32 AM
  #3818  
Tech Master
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,081
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by G2B Anthony
I have changed the front drive belt to BD one, result is very smooth and very flexible for the belt tension choice. Try Try

Besides, does anyone tried use 4 O-ring to the upper deck rear screw position? Any different.

i run all 4 screws with o-rings on the back and i do think the car flexes quite a bit more with four rather than 2 also i did it because my car was tweaked bad and when i put all 4 orings on there and put it back on the tweak board it really helped alot. this is with the ITF chassis and top deck.

also do you know what the part # was for the belt that you got? i ordered one just hope its the right one its for the BD car


anyone or everyone else, what is everyone gearing their car? 48p or 64p? stock, 19t and mod?? rubber tires? i ran a 38/100 on a 10.5 BL on carpet with rubber tires but my next race is at the kissimee track where the worlds were in 2004 i plan on running either 19t or mod so any advice would be much appreciated as far as gearing goes
punkracer24 is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 08:42 AM
  #3819  
Tech Adept
 
tcfree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 117
Default

Team Bomber (#TB20022) Front Drive Belt For BD
or
BD FRONT DRIVE BELT BD516L.

The bomber 1 is better but std yokomo belt is better than tc5 kit belt
tcfree is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 09:13 AM
  #3820  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Verndog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PPDBillet.com USA
Posts: 1,845
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by zacabrandy
I dont understand why everyone is changing the belts on this car? The belts I recieved with it are fantastic, super strong, smooth and have plenty of flex and adjustment.

I run mod, 19T, and find them to be just fine, am I missing something here?

Cheers
Aaron
Couldn't agree more. I expected to have some possible issues (from reading these posts) with mine and after 50+ runs the belts are working flawlessly. A little tight to start on rear but that loosened the first 10 runs and is staying put now. I wont be switching belts without some other reason.
Verndog is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 10:54 AM
  #3821  
Tech Adept
 
tcfree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 117
Default

hi, Just i found the std belts 2 be very tight even on the slack settings on the cam, after 50+ run's i shud think it wud loosen up, aslong as it's working for u thats good

Dunno who said about my power cap being in a bad place??
This any better?



Thanks
ste
tcfree is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 11:24 AM
  #3822  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
RAP66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 337
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Verndog
Couldn't agree more. I expected to have some possible issues (from reading these posts) with mine and after 50+ runs the belts are working flawlessly. A little tight to start on rear but that loosened the first 10 runs and is staying put now. I wont be switching belts without some other reason.
Same here... my belts seem perfectly fine
RAP66 is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:06 PM
  #3823  
Tech Adept
 
KING COOPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mesa
Posts: 153
Default

are you guys changing the rear also. my belts seem to be find but idk. also where are you guys getting the white spurs?
KING COOPA is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:22 PM
  #3824  
Tech Master
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,081
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

dont us wrong guys the stock belts are fine. they hold up well. the only complaint people are having is that they are just a little to tight. in my case my car probably has 15+ runs on it now and the belt even in its loosest position is still tight enough to tweak the car. i felt a few other cars at the track and theirs were waay looser than mine so i figured personally that i would try something to fix it. Associated already has plans for another low-friction belt to come out at some point because the part # is already in the part catalog that comes with the kit.
punkracer24 is offline  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:37 PM
  #3825  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,854
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Yeah my belts are super tight on my car as well. I tried to run my rear diff in the lowest possible position and the rear belt was so tight it was tweaking my car. Has anyone else been able to run the rear diff utra low and the belt feel fine tension wise? Has anyone tired to take every other tooth off the belts to soften them up some? I might just try a BD front belt and then wait for the Associated low friction belts but thats not helping me now. What have some of the guys with belt problems tired other then soakin the belt in Oil?
Kevin K is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.