20LikesSingle belt TC, any advantage?
11-05-2018, 08:12 PM
#31
Could someone would agree what it said, "more linear feel"?
BD7 Spice - Yukinori Kagayama - TITC - Bangkok - 16-19.02.2017
BD7 Spice - Yukinori Kagayama - TITC - Bangkok - 16-19.02.2017
11-05-2018, 08:25 PM
#32
Could someone would agree what it said, "more linear feel"?
BD7 Spice - Yukinori Kagayama - TITC - Bangkok - 16-19.02.2017
BD7 Spice - Yukinori Kagayama - TITC - Bangkok - 16-19.02.2017
11-05-2018, 08:47 PM
#33
To be honest, I met a guy in Yatabe Arena few weeks ago, and he shows me a similar car with this conversion kit.
His car uses 40t/20t pulleys with bd7 2015 bulkheads added SMJ BBSS shock tower, instead using main parts of 2016, about belt I doubt is ta07, didn't remember about all details, sorry!
That's why i asked about single belt cars.
Unfortunately this kit could only find inside of Japan
11-05-2018, 09:16 PM
#34
To be honest, I met a guy in Yatabe Arena few weeks ago, and he shows me a similar car with this conversion kit.
His car uses 40t/20t pulleys with bd7 2015 bulkheads added SMJ BBSS shock tower, instead using main parts of 2016, about belt I doubt is ta07, didn't remember about all details, sorry!
That's why i asked about single belt cars.
Unfortunately this kit could only find inside of Japan
11-05-2018, 09:35 PM
#35
11-06-2018, 01:59 AM
#37
To answer the original question...
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
11-06-2018, 03:09 AM
#38
To answer the original question...
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
But of course i am looking for if it has little advantage for blinky.
11-06-2018, 12:58 PM
#39
To answer the original question...
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
A single belt design is less efficient as the belt has to 'flex' in both directions.
If it was a better design, everyone would be using instead of having moved away from it.
It also means the belt has to run down the centre line of the car so the motor is moved further out, again that's a step backwards.
11-06-2018, 11:40 PM
#40
Tech Regular
iTrader: (22)
Kx1
do you still have it?
can you send pictures I’m interested in purchasing the kx-one and any parts you might have for it.
Email [email protected]
11-07-2018, 01:37 AM
#41
If the main belt is central, no matter what you do, the motor *must* be further out as the motor mount and belt position are the limiting factors.
11-08-2018, 07:03 AM
#42
Tech Regular
but if spur is between belt and motor, you have to move motor away from belt to make space for spur. With spur on other side, motor can be closer to belt.
