Any word on the new 4wd 1/10 buggy platform? Associated
#31
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
I find it ironic how people swear by Tamiya when their main focus is the toy RC market and their "Race Quality" kits have historically been of similar quality to that of their toy kits. They promise all this and that and they produce radically designed models, but they never live up to the hype. And they cost, well… An arm… And a Leg, and you can't even find arms. LOL
I too prefer to run less popular brands but I would never touch a tame kit for competitive off-road racing.
I too prefer to run less popular brands but I would never touch a tame kit for competitive off-road racing.
#32
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
I find it ironic how people swear by Tamiya when their main focus is the toy RC market and their "Race Quality" kits have historically been of similar quality to that of their toy kits. They promise all this and that and they produce radically designed models, but they never live up to the hype. And they cost, well… An arm… And a Leg, and you can't even find arms. LOL
I too prefer to run less popular brands but I would never touch a tame kit for competitive off-road racing.
I too prefer to run less popular brands but I would never touch a tame kit for competitive off-road racing.
Not even close. And yes, their MSRP is insane, but they can be had for the same or slightly more than any other car and come with goodies in the box that most others don't. There are always these outlandish comments about TRF that are completely inaccurate. I've never had another RC that matches TRF quality and I've been in the hobby about 20 years. Can't find arms??? The same arms from like 6 different vehicles fit any of the TRF 4wd buggies and the rear of the 2wd. The arms are literally everywhere. BTW, there is quite a few Associated parts that can work in a pinch such as arms!!!
#36
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
I completely agree that they are out to lunch on that one. Definitely behind the times. On road is obviously TRF's main focus, but that doesn't change the fact that they make amazing off road vehicles as well. Not many people like them and that is perfect. If TRF was Associated, I'd find something new anyway. The hexes for the rear are $10 and many people swap B5m or Yokomo parts in the front for a hex. I don't run the 2wd TRF anymore. I'm only disagreeing with Incubus' quality comments. That's just foolish. BTW Incubus, they all make "toy" quality cars as well as race cars so that is insignificant.
#37
I completely agree that they are out to lunch on that one. Definitely behind the times. On road is obviously TRF's main focus, but that doesn't change the fact that they make amazing off road vehicles as well. Not many people like them and that is perfect. If TRF was Associated, I'd find something new anyway. The hexes for the rear are $10 and many people swap B5m or Yokomo parts in the front for a hex. I don't run the 2wd TRF anymore. I'm only disagreeing with Incubus' quality comments. That's just foolish. BTW Incubus, they all make "toy" quality cars as well as race cars so that is insignificant.
Don't forget about the little part where the rear arms are exact replicas of B4 rear arms...Or the other little part where you have to dremel the rear arm just to fit onto the car; and the manual neglects to tell you.
#38
Tech Apprentice
If they stick with the standardized name system it should be called the RC10 B54. I really hope they model it after the b5 series of buggies, focus on durability and simplicity. It should be the versatile and solid buggy that the b5 set.
#39
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
Well I've owned a few TRF kits in the last 30 years and they flat out sucked where it counts… Performance. Period, end of story.
Fit and finish were always stellar but it means jack when the car sucks and or is a tank.
I will say that the best overall quality I've found is Durango. Fit and finish on par with the best and they don't develop slop over time. My 410 is now my son's car and the rear arms on it are now 2 seasons old and have battle marks on them but there is absolutely ZERO play and absolutely ZERO Binding. I have yet to see another car achieve this. This is partly why people claim their cars aren't durable. The more precise and rigid you make something, the less give it will have so precision driving is your best friend. Seriously considering
Ever seen a D413 out of the box? It has about as much slop all over it as honey booboo's mom! (sorry I just vurped).
My PRS1 is far better than anything 2WD Tamiya has ever produced.
Fit and finish were always stellar but it means jack when the car sucks and or is a tank.
I will say that the best overall quality I've found is Durango. Fit and finish on par with the best and they don't develop slop over time. My 410 is now my son's car and the rear arms on it are now 2 seasons old and have battle marks on them but there is absolutely ZERO play and absolutely ZERO Binding. I have yet to see another car achieve this. This is partly why people claim their cars aren't durable. The more precise and rigid you make something, the less give it will have so precision driving is your best friend. Seriously considering
Ever seen a D413 out of the box? It has about as much slop all over it as honey booboo's mom! (sorry I just vurped).
My PRS1 is far better than anything 2WD Tamiya has ever produced.
#40
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
The moment you put another brand parts on your TRF car, you've admitted that Tamiyia failed at designing a decent car.
Don't forget about the little part where the rear arms are exact replicas of B4 rear arms...Or the other little part where you have to dremel the rear arm just to fit onto the car; and the manual neglects to tell you.
Don't forget about the little part where the rear arms are exact replicas of B4 rear arms...Or the other little part where you have to dremel the rear arm just to fit onto the car; and the manual neglects to tell you.
Last edited by mx836; 01-07-2016 at 03:35 PM.