Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread! >

TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree26Likes

TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-23-2016, 10:37 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: TLR 22 3.0 Race Kit Thread!
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Matt Trimmings
Cub86 posted the question: Hi. I'm struggling to understand the lay down situation. I run on high bite damp smooth clay and think the conversation would help on my surface but from what I'm reading I need to buy the lay down kit tlr338004. And the dirt gear case tlr332063. But do I really need both from what I've read the dirt case is 1-2mm higher anyway and u don't use the +3mm hubs or the front pivot hrc or Hrc mod. So is the dirt lay down kit tlr332063 is all that's needed to get me a lay down set up that's suited for clay With the components and car I already have. And if I only get the dirt case is there any problems that will need to be addressed IE.. bone plunge . I do know I'll need 1mm spacers on the waterfall to clear the battery. Thanks guys really trying to get my head around this.

Franks response:
Laydown Conversion will work great by itself. You run the aluminum +3mm hubs, the diff is +3.5mm, and you run the HRC front setup. Just follow a setup sheet from tlracing.com (Frank Root).

Dirt Tranny has the diff at the same height as the standard tranny case, and works with the standard plastic hubs. Both are +/- 0mm from stock. When you run this, no need to run the HRC front mod either.

I've found the stock laydown conversion parts to work great for most tracks. The dirt tranny is a great tuning option, but definitely not 'required'.

K.King
Something I made, pretty basic. Just to give people an idea.

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2016, 09:03 AM
  #1411  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
RC10Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,939
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rcgod
How do you calculate the amount of spring rate change required for a change in front kick up?
I don't. I do it empirically. I set my springs by taking the oil out of the shocks, pressing the chassis down, and watching the front and rear bounce back up when I release the chassis. If one end bounces up faster than the other it means that end is stiffer. Every car I've built comes with the front stiffer than the rear out of the box. A car that is stiffer up front tends to understeer, which is easier to drive than a car that oversteers. Anyway, if I have springs, I try swapping springs until I get the front and rear to bounce up at the same rate. If not, I adjust shock mounting locations until I get the front and rear balanced. In physics I learned about how force vectors work, so I knew changing the angle of the shocks would change the effective stiffness. With that in mind, I did this procedure after changing the front kick.

Chris, thanks for the tip! I don't know why I didn't think of that while building it.
RC10Nick is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 10:02 AM
  #1412  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

Originally Posted by RC10Nick
For those interested, I have another follow up post to my initial build post and my first track test post.

On Sunday I had my first race day with the car. Overall I would consider it a very successful day. For myself, I define success as making the A Main and not finishing dead last. Mod buggy is very competitive where I race, and even though this past Sunday was a light turnout, we still had enough to go to a C Main. My first qual was good enough to put me in the A-Main, which I needed because my second qual was somewhat of a disaster. Remember the drive pin I had fall out in my initial track test post? Well, the other drive pin decided to work its way out during the 2nd qual (despite building it with thread lock on the set screw). Again, this isn't something I had to worry about for the last three years I had a Durango so I find it pretty frustrating. I'll just keep an eye on them until I get my shrink tube in the mail to put over the CVD joint to keep it from happening again. Anyway, with that issue temporarily sorted out, I started 7th in the A and finnished 6th. I consider that a very good result for myself.
The archaic cvd design was probably for cost cutting measures, but not what I expected on a car that is heavily redesigned. There is a reason why the majority of CVDs are captured now. Could have easily changed the drive axle design to accept a spring retainer for the pin imo. But who knows, maybe it will appear as an upgrade option

Edit: I take that back. There is no space on the rear hub to add anything to the CVD, even shrink wrap. I guess that's our answer.
redbones is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 10:14 AM
  #1413  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wixom, MI
Posts: 105
Default

Anyone know if the Exotek wing mount fits, there site just says 22?
Chad_R40 is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 10:17 AM
  #1414  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (170)
 
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 6,272
Trader Rating: 170 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chad_R40
Anyone know if the Exotek wing mount fits, there site just says 22?
No. The rear tower has been completely redesigned.
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 11:10 AM
  #1415  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (40)
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 512
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by redbones
The archaic cvd design was probably for cost cutting measures, but not what I expected on a car that is heavily redesigned. There is a reason why the majority of CVDs are captured now. Could have easily changed the drive axle design to accept a spring retainer for the pin imo. But who knows, maybe it will appear as an upgrade option

Edit: I take that back. There is no space on the rear hub to add anything to the CVD, even shrink wrap. I guess that's our answer.
MIP CVDs are captured. Either on the regular bone / axel or their pucks systems (2.0 is the same). If you are concerned that could be an option for you.

I run TLR CVDs in about half of my fleet and have never had a pin come out. Not to insult anyone's skill or tools, but using a high quality driver can be the difference. I use the MIP drivers and feel I can get a good amount of torque on the set screw without stripping.
E-Mann is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 01:03 PM
  #1416  
Tech Regular
 
rcus3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: any*cal
Posts: 353
Default

Originally Posted by RC10Nick
...adjust shock mounting locations until I get the front and rear balanced...
Aren't you, in effect changing the motion ratio if you change the shock mounting location?
rcus3r is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 01:25 PM
  #1417  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by o.s. power
In every kit I have tapped the holes, I have never had a screw come loose. I started doing this years ago when Losi kits were graphite, you had to tap the holes. I do it because the cars go together so much easier and it's easier on the screw hexes. I used a 3mm plug tap on this car and went all the way through. If i were to do it again, I would probably not tap the caster blocks where the shouldered screws go in.
Thanks for the extra info, I will try it out on our next build!
DJPod is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 01:33 PM
  #1418  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

Originally Posted by E-Mann
MIP CVDs are captured. Either on the regular bone / axel or their pucks systems (2.0 is the same). If you are concerned that could be an option for you.

I run TLR CVDs in about half of my fleet and have never had a pin come out. Not to insult anyone's skill or tools, but using a high quality driver can be the difference. I use the MIP drivers and feel I can get a good amount of torque on the set screw without stripping.
I make sure to de-grease the threads and use a good tool to tighten down that pin too. The good thing about the captured style is that it gives the CVD another axis to rotate upon, but I can't really tell a diff
redbones is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 01:54 PM
  #1419  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
RC10Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,939
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rcus3r
Aren't you, in effect changing the motion ratio if you change the shock mounting location?
Yup. But I don't think it's enough to make a difference.

I should probably state the motion ratios I measured and calculated were after I changed my shock mounting positions. I really don't think they'll change drastically, and I'll probably never re-calculate them even if I move my mounting locations.
RC10Nick is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 06:52 PM
  #1420  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 31
Default

Tired of using the pins for battery strap and would like to go to a thumb screw type. Will the tlr thrumb screw kit work with stock battery brace running sideways battery? Any other options?
killshot01 is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:01 PM
  #1421  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Oak Hills, SoCal
Posts: 208
Default

Just wondering if anyone has been testing gear diffs on indoor clay tracks and if so how have the outcomes been
FPMX772 is offline  
Old 01-05-2016, 09:18 PM
  #1422  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Bobby Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,132
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by killshot01
Tired of using the pins for battery strap and would like to go to a thumb screw type. Will the tlr thrumb screw kit work with stock battery brace running sideways battery? Any other options?
Yes it will fit but you will need a few extra spacers. I used the aluminum rear axle spacer (installed first in chassis) followed by aluminum 2mm washer and then the TLR aluminum post from their thumb screw option kit for the 2.0

Last edited by Matt M.; 03-11-2017 at 03:28 AM.
Bobby Z is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 06:01 AM
  #1423  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
dski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 770
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by o.s. power
In every kit I have tapped the holes, I have never had a screw come loose. I started doing this years ago when Losi kits were graphite, you had to tap the holes. I do it because the cars go together so much easier and it's easier on the screw hexes. I used a 3mm plug tap on this car and went all the way through. If i were to do it again, I would probably not tap the caster blocks where the shouldered screws go in.

I feel like tapping plastic makes the screws thread too easily. They seem to lose a lot of holding power. The old old Losi kits use to give you a 4-40 screw that had tapered threads for starting threads but the threads never got as deep as a real tap. That worked really good. I wish I had a metric version of that.
dski is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 07:19 AM
  #1424  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (34)
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orange, Ca
Posts: 17,869
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by FPMX772
Just wondering if anyone has been testing gear diffs on indoor clay tracks and if so how have the outcomes been
I have been running a gear diff. I am currently at 2 gear and 20K (take out one set of the spider gears to increase oil volume).

Seems to work pretty well. Need to do some back to back testing but this seems to work pretty well for me so far.
Casper is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 07:25 AM
  #1425  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Oak Hills, SoCal
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
I have been running a gear diff. I am currently at 2 gear and 20K (take out one set of the spider gears to increase oil volume).

Seems to work pretty well. Need to do some back to back testing but this seems to work pretty well for me so far.
Ok thanks for that info Casper. Just so I'm clear, you took out 2 of the 4 smaller gears inside the diff?
FPMX772 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.