Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B4.2 Thread >

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Team Associated B4.2 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2013 | 11:00 AM
  #12031  
Speed Freak RC's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 711
From: Bellaire, Michigan
Default

No need for a mid motor here so I am glad I don't have to pay for the extra parts I won't be using anyways.
Speed Freak RC is offline  
Old 12-25-2013 | 07:13 PM
  #12032  
aaron2u's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,741
From: Marshall, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Freak RC
I used to use a SC10 battery foam before I ran the esc behind the battery and it worked well.
I used a piece of scrap lexan flashing from a body. It's molded at 90 degrees, taped it to the bottom of the chassis with 3m double sided tape, lip toward the front. Then I mounted my esc on top, then inserted a small foam between the esc and the lip on the lexan. Then a normal foam, with the shorty battery all the way forward. Not the cleanest install, but has worked so far. Cheaper than a shelf too.

Last edited by aaron2u; 12-25-2013 at 07:25 PM.
aaron2u is offline  
Old 12-25-2013 | 07:27 PM
  #12033  
aaron2u's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,741
From: Marshall, IL
Default

If the price is in line, I could see buying both. If they try to price is like a Kyosho, I'll get a b5M and keep the 4.2, just sayin'.
aaron2u is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 04:21 AM
  #12034  
Tech Master
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,351
Default

Hey all, I hope everyone had a great holiday! Question... 8mm is not that much, is it really worth getting the +8 chassis? I've been customizing by B4.1 and have an extra chassis that is the FT Carbon, yet I've been thinking about the +8.
LoudOne is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 04:26 AM
  #12035  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 398
From: Hamburg
Default

8mm is a big difference for me. But I'd wait for the B5 to come out before buying anything.
Cody227 is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 07:39 AM
  #12036  
huzzler's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 704
From: Hemet
Default

Originally Posted by Cody227
8mm is a big difference for me. But I'd wait for the B5 to come out before buying anything.
What is waiting for the B5 matter if he doesn't even plan on buying one?
huzzler is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 07:48 AM
  #12037  
Speed Freak RC's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 711
From: Bellaire, Michigan
Default

If you race on a tight track, the +8 is not needed. It will give you more stability on a higher speed open track though. It will also help give more stability if you race on low traction surfaces as well.
Speed Freak RC is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 10:46 AM
  #12038  
Pittsdriver's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 706
Default

How are the Lunsford ballcups? How to they compare to RPM? I have RPM on now but bought a Lunsford turnbuckle kit that came with cups.
Pittsdriver is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 10:51 AM
  #12039  
predu's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 499
From: Henderson,NV
Default

from stock 2mm front ballstud washer which way gives more roll 3mm or 1mm? and more roll more steering less roll less steering?
predu is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 11:06 AM
  #12040  
t0p_sh0tta's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,863
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by predu
from stock 2mm front ballstud washer which way gives more roll 3mm or 1mm? and more roll more steering less roll less steering?
Increasing ballstud height will increase roll in the corner. This can increase or decrease steering based on the rest of your setup.

As long as your front tires aren't rolling over on themselves (combo of soft tires and foams), then you'll likely gain a bit more mid-corner steering.
t0p_sh0tta is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 11:57 AM
  #12041  
predu's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 499
From: Henderson,NV
Default

Originally Posted by t0p_sh0tta
Increasing ballstud height will increase roll in the corner. This can increase or decrease steering based on the rest of your setup.

As long as your front tires aren't rolling over on themselves (combo of soft tires and foams), then you'll likely gain a bit more mid-corner steering.
fronts are ss suburbs and stock 2/3 foam.just need more steering it pushes too much for me. according to the guys i talked to my setup is good, but my driving style wants more steering.
predu is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 03:31 PM
  #12042  
Jerm13's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,251
From: The 405
Default

Originally Posted by predu
fronts are ss suburbs and stock 2/3 foam.just need more steering it pushes too much for me. according to the guys i talked to my setup is good, but my driving style wants more steering.
I had the same issue but....

I was running ss ribs. I tried adding weight to the tri in the front, further forward under the shock tower. Then I tried camber from zero to -3. Then moved the ball studs in on the tower and out on the hubs. Finnaly ended up having too much steering when I put on SS Suburbs. Here is what I ended up with.

Inner Ball studs on inner holes 1silver and one blue spacer, outers on the outer hole with 30 degree caster blocks.
-1 degree camber
3 chuncks of lead under the front tower (forward one is trimmed to fit perfectly) but none in the tri's.
M3 Suburbs with 1/2 open cell foams.
bottom of the front arms level with full pack.

I don't run any of the carbon stuff. I tried the molded foams but didn't like the high speed steering they had and never used a shorty pack.

Hope this helps.
Jerm13 is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 03:42 PM
  #12043  
Pittsdriver's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 706
Default

Messing with ballstud washer height is something I have not messed with yet.
Pittsdriver is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 03:53 PM
  #12044  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 179
From: U.C. TX
Default

Originally Posted by Pittsdriver
Messing with ballstud washer height is something I have not messed with yet.
You should! I didn't think it would make a huge difference either. I was completely wrong. Removing the rear ball stud washers combined with decreasing the shock oil (40>35), made the rear end of the car FAR more predictable. Still a little bouncy on some of the sections coming out of the corners, but the track has been neglected since the last rain (last saturday).
Rabidtrout is offline  
Old 12-26-2013 | 03:56 PM
  #12045  
predu's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 499
From: Henderson,NV
Default

Originally Posted by Jerm13
I had the same issue but....

I was running ss ribs. I tried adding weight to the tri in the front, further forward under the shock tower. Then I tried camber from zero to -3. Then moved the ball studs in on the tower and out on the hubs. Finnaly ended up having too much steering when I put on SS Suburbs. Here is what I ended up with.

Inner Ball studs on inner holes 1silver and one blue spacer, outers on the outer hole with 30 degree caster blocks.
-1 degree camber
3 chuncks of lead under the front tower (forward one is trimmed to fit perfectly) but none in the tri's.
M3 Suburbs with 1/2 open cell foams.
bottom of the front arms level with full pack.

I don't run any of the carbon stuff. I tried the molded foams but didn't like the high speed steering they had and never used a shorty pack.

Hope this helps.
high speed is where i have the biggest push,i will try some of the suggestions, also this is low to medium bite indooor
predu is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.