Team Associated B4.2 Thread
#7141
Tech Regular
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 398
From: Hamburg
i dont know yet. pretty much room for the receiver and transponder: i could put it on the servo or on the sites, but the esc is too big. most likely i will put it on the battery strap (if i am going to use one) or in front of the battery if using shorty packs. I don't know how wide i can make the chassis by now because i want to use the centro finnisher body, but a nice guy here will send me his old C4 chassis soon.
#7142
That is the issue I have with these alum conversion cars. Where to put the electronics. If you run a full sized pack, this becomes a problem. I liked the rb6, but the esc location was a real pain for me. It was buried in the RM config. I did however like the channels they put in for a clean wiring job. But because of the esc location, running a full pack could be a pain. With the current trend, shorties might become the goto for stock or mod in these new cars. AE will probably make a buggy with an alum chassis, but I am on the fence with that. makes the car heavy. I know a lot of local struggles with the alum chassis in 17.5. Mostly because the track were designed with 13.5 in mind for the jumps. Thus, 17.5 would often case the jumps. If the track were designed with 17.5 in mind, it might be better.
#7143
Tech Addict
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 711
I have had a few u braces break when running the shaved u brace with spacers to run the a outside hubs... 8 scale size tracks with a lot less plastic when you shim it up 3mm.
Does anyone know of a longer ball stud that would work for the rear ubrace then the stock ones?
Thanks!
Does anyone know of a longer ball stud that would work for the rear ubrace then the stock ones?
Thanks!
#7146
well, I would change the ubrace for the tracks or get an alum brace and use TI studs with the wide washers. You could also try the wide washers and put a nut on the bottom with a long ball stud to support it more. The ubrace it not too hard to swap out, I would just use 2 of them or just get the alum brace.
#7147
#7150
I have my esc in the back of the battery tray on my sc10b.2 (car in question) and it's a 20 minute job to swap braces (if I have one available) would be nice if there was a way to run both config's on the same brace. I'm real close to pulling the trigger on alum brace with Ti studs....seems like thats the only way to use 1 brace for 2 configs.
#7151
I'm running these. They are longer than those Losi ball studs:

http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...all-Stud-Set-2

http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...all-Stud-Set-2
#7152
Tech Adept
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 189
WC, how did that new graphite rack work for ya?
Just about to order one.
I put my speedo on the shelf, transponder, reciver, and cap is all underneath the shelf. My car got a wicked oversteer, high speed mainly. Its fast, but hard to drive.
Does the additonal 40 grams behind the battery, you added help this?
Thanks, Krom.
Just about to order one.
I put my speedo on the shelf, transponder, reciver, and cap is all underneath the shelf. My car got a wicked oversteer, high speed mainly. Its fast, but hard to drive.
Does the additonal 40 grams behind the battery, you added help this?
Thanks, Krom.
#7153
krom
very happy with the Vision-Racing steering rack , the precision machined bushings fit way better then factory . No slop , zero ....
And you can fine tune steering with 2 extra ball stud locations .
I just ordered a couple glue tip from , very cool stainless steel tips ...
Finally can glue a tire like a pro ...
additional ballast weight in the rear tray adds stability & traction ...
zero weight brings better jumping & landings , more reactive steering
very happy with the Vision-Racing steering rack , the precision machined bushings fit way better then factory . No slop , zero ....
And you can fine tune steering with 2 extra ball stud locations .
I just ordered a couple glue tip from , very cool stainless steel tips ...
Finally can glue a tire like a pro ...
additional ballast weight in the rear tray adds stability & traction ...
zero weight brings better jumping & landings , more reactive steering
#7154
My local indoor track is clay and there's so much traction it's stupid. All you run are slicks. With that said, I've run the Durango and Schumacher in mid-motor form and it's a joke. They can't even come close to times you can pull off with standard rear-motor cars. They turn great but there's not enough rear traction.
I'm not getting how any mid-motor is going to be competitive even with relatively advanced driving skills if you're driving on dirt. I can see it on carpet or euro-style indoor tracks (or if you're one of the top 10 drivers in the world), but not anywhere else.
I'm not getting how any mid-motor is going to be competitive even with relatively advanced driving skills if you're driving on dirt. I can see it on carpet or euro-style indoor tracks (or if you're one of the top 10 drivers in the world), but not anywhere else.




4Likes