Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread >

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree172Likes

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 12-21-2016, 08:46 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: tobamiester
RB6.6 Kyosho America Product Page: http://www.kyoshoamerica.com/ULTIMA-...T_p_24505.html

RB6.6 Manual http://www.kyosho.com/jpn/support/in...A_RB6_6_IM.pdf

RB6.6 Kyosho Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW_sR667utY

MSRP $639 MAP $399.99

-------------------------------
New RB6.6 parts (compared exploded views, prices and links are Kyosho America):

Chassis:
  1. Main chassis - UM731 - $125.99
  2. Side guards - UM732 - $9.99

Battery Holder:
  1. Battery plate - UM733 - $8.99
  2. Battery foam - UM741 - $7.99

Rear Bulkheads:
  1. MM3 and Laydown - UM740 - $9.99
    • MM3 bulkhead
    • Laydown bulkhead
    • Swaybar Holders

3 Gear Transmission (MM and RM):
  1. Transmission - UM734 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • plastic FR & RR suspension hangers

  2. Gear Cover - UM735 - $6.99

Laydown Transmission (3 and 4 gear possible):
  1. Transmission - UM736 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • required extra hardware
    • pastic FR suspension hanger

  2. 40T idler - UM737 - $6.99
  3. Motor plate - UM738 - $18.99
  4. Gear cover - UM739 - $6.99

Body:
  1. Blade body - UMB05 - $27.99

Optional Parts:
  1. Lightweigt Blade body - UMB05LW - $31.99
  2. Aluminum FR suspension hanger - UMW705B - $28.99 (may be able to file UMW705 to fit)
  3. Brass FR suspension hanger - UMW725B - $30.99 (looks more different than UMW725..someone confirm?)

Typical Upgrades for new RB6.6 Buyers

UMW701 Aluminum Steering Plate (RB6)
UMW702 Aluminum Crank Arm (RB6)
UMW704-0 V2 Aluminum Rear Hub Set(0°/RB6)
UMW705B Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RF/RB6.6) or brass UMW725B
UMW707 Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RR-Mid)

Nice to have:

UMW723 Aluminum Front Sus Block (Type B/10g/RB6/RT6/SC6).


Aftermarket Parts:

Front Wing: https://www.prolineracing.com/perfor...mount-alum-rb6

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2013, 05:58 PM
  #7141  
Tech Lord
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PFKAOG
or if he has a clue what he's talking about
Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
your just a keyboard hero with nothing to contribute. Its a sad life you lead sir
Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
your a winner. not sure who pee'd in your cheerios, but I will be up in phx in a couple weeks at w3, your more than welcome to further discuss your issues with me in person. cats eat gophers, just say'in
Let's real it in here a little bit fellas, we're all on the same team
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 06:28 PM
  #7142  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
Nope, longer links lower your roll center, which decreases roll resistance (more roll)


It does, as I explained what you will get when you run the narrow hangers.

Wider track = more roll resistance = less traction/bite when cornering
Narrow track = more roll = more traction/bite when cornering
ok, I agree. I misread what you said, I thought you were saying less roll with narrow hangers. And yeah, I know longer links lower the roll center,lol.

ok, regardless of the science and math. My rb6 was extremely planed on low bit surfaces with the wide hangers. Way more so than the b4. So I cant imagine even more side bite. I dont think i would have liked it much. But I got my kit used and it didnt come with the narrow hangers, so I was unable to try. But I was so happy with the wide hangers and dropping 2 seconds per lap over the b4, I guess I really didnt even care to try it. it turned onn a dime and never lost grip.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 07:54 PM
  #7143  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Bob, the c-hubs "raise" the roll center. The a-hubs lower the roll center. So, you were wanting a relationship I think.

Narrow hangers = raise the roll center and the c-hubs raise the roll center
Wide Hangers = lower roll center and the A hubs lower the roll center.

Now these are different cars, so I am not sure i would directly correlate those comparisons. That being said, I always thought my b4 rolled more with A hubs than the C. It always wanted to skate with the C hubs. If you have the stock arms and wide hangers, I would still try it out for comparison. It only only maters how it feels to you.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 08:27 PM
  #7144  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
gelshocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 719
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

As a layman I look at it this way: imagine you're running the 100m. When you start off the blocks your legs are planted wider for stability. Once you're posture is stable, you narrow your legs for more forward traction, concentrating on pushing yourself forward. If you try running with your legs wide the entire race you won't get that forward push down the stretch.

The wide hangers will reduce chances of flipping when cornering, sacrificing traction. For low traction and bumpy tracks I go for wide hangers. On a stable high traction track I go for narrow. My 2 cents, Cheers!
gelshocker is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 08:57 PM
  #7145  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gelshocker
As a layman I look at it this way: imagine you're running the 100m. When you start off the blocks your legs are planted wider for stability. Once you're posture is stable, you narrow your legs for more forward traction, concentrating on pushing yourself forward. If you try running with your legs wide the entire race you won't get that forward push down the stretch.

The wide hangers will reduce chances of flipping when cornering, sacrificing traction. For low traction and bumpy tracks I go for wide hangers. On a stable high traction track I go for narrow. My 2 cents, Cheers!
lol, I was thinking of the running thing also. something my coach said when I was on the track team. But I was not sure if running and cars are the same, lol. I was also thinking about dragsters that put the wheels close together. That is why when I was told narrow wheel base was more forward bite, it sounded believable. Also, lol. Wider arms and hangers weight more, thus more weight over the rear wheels for forward bite, lol.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 10:46 PM
  #7146  
Tech Lord
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
Narrow hangers = raise the roll center and the c-hubs raise the roll center
Wide Hangers = lower roll center and the A hubs lower the roll center.
No.. you still have that backwards.

Narrow hangers = lowers the roll center
Wide Hangers = raises the roll center
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:25 AM
  #7147  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
No.. you still have that backwards.

Narrow hangers = lowers the roll center
Wide Hangers = raises the roll center
grrr. longer links have the same roll center effect as raising the inner ball stud, no? raising the stud/longer link lower the roll center. yes?
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:35 AM
  #7148  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,616
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Raising and lowering the ballstud depends on if you are doing it inboard or outboard. inboard it's the opposite, up to lower, down to raise. Outboard it's the same, up to raise, down to lower. The change inboard is more significant than the change outboard.

Think of it this way
If you raise the inboard 1mm and leave outboard alone, you lower roll center by a 'full step'
If you raise inboard AND outboard 1mm, you are lowering roll center by 'half a step'. This is because while you are lowering the RC inboard, you are counteracting that change slightly outboard.

So when I say C Hub or A Hub, I am taking into consideration the value of the entire change (inboard and outboard).

Now that we are done talking about Roll Centers, can we drool over the RT6 some?
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:42 AM
  #7149  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

yeah, but the net change for the C is still a higher roll center. yeah, I know on the outside up is up and down is down.

Is the RT6 out?
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:00 AM
  #7150  
Tech Lord
Thread Starter
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
grrr. longer links have the same roll center effect as raising the inner ball stud, no?
Well.. sort of. They both lower the roll center, but they are different as to WHEN (along the roll) the "resistance to roll" changes.

For example, if the angle of the link stays exactly the same, but all you do is make the link longer... with both cars sitting side by side with neither of them rolling... the roll center is exactly the same. It's not until after the car has started to roll, that the extra (or less) roll resistance comes in. Think of a curved graph.

but the short answer to your question is "yes", they both lower the roll center.

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
raising the stud/longer link lower the roll center. yes?
yes (inner stud).
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 09:22 AM
  #7151  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
joecool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 623
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Read the section on roll center and camber links from this xxx main set up guide. This is for onroad cars but the principles are the same for all cars. Start with page 60 for roll center explanations.

http://www.brccc.co.za/Info/Main%20C...up%20Guide.pdf
joecool is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 11:15 AM
  #7152  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (42)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,755
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joecool
Read the section on roll center and camber links from this xxx main set up guide. This is for onroad cars but the principles are the same for all cars. Start with page 60 for roll center explanations.

http://www.brccc.co.za/Info/Main%20C...up%20Guide.pdf
I still have those RR and RF blocks in gun metal NIP as well as a NIP alum. 1deg rear hub in blue for sale...
Nexus is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 11:28 AM
  #7153  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ColbyRichards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 566
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
At least I try to be helful on line and at the track. Where as your just a keyboard hero with nothing to contribute. Its a sad life you lead sir
You are the biggest troll on this forum. Just spamming the threads for attention. Spewing out misinformation about cars you don't even race.

ColbyRichards is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:12 PM
  #7154  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (37)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DeSoto MO
Posts: 255
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ColbyRichards
You are the biggest troll on this forum. Just spamming the threads for attention. Spewing out misinformation about cars you don't even race.

Wildcat is Wildcherry's son?
rnpnick is offline  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:34 PM
  #7155  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ColbyRichards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 566
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rnpnick
Wildcat is Wildcherry's son?
? He is?

ColbyRichards is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.