Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree5Likes

SC10 4x4 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2011 | 03:35 PM
  #5836  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 427
Default

I made some changes yesterday to my truck and boy did it make a diffrance. I was having trouble getting the rear end to hook up. it would come around on me kind of easy. so yesterday before the races i changed the front sway bars to the 2.2 bars and the rear to the thinest bar, and changed the shocks to emultion with 35wt in front and 30 wt in rear, ran -1 degree camber in front and -2 in rear. truck was alot more planted and was really cosistant. set ride height at 25mm. truck was pulling crazy rear bumper wheelies. but stayed in control. now to tweek it a little more and this thing will be incredible.
bseckel is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:18 PM
  #5837  
Jstall7543's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,106
From: Down Town Olympia
Default

Originally Posted by SHAUN GRIDER
i seem to like both losi and associated i own the associated but drove a friends losi and liked it and was running faster with it then i do with my associated truck. we do have different motors he has the mamba 3800kv
and i have a novak 5.5hv 550
I own all three motors, the ballistic 4.5 is faster than the 3800 in every way, the ballistic 5.5 is a closer match to the 3800kv. Add a little timing to the 5.5 or gear up a tooth or two or both. Watch your temps! The 4.5 and 5.5 also have way less drag off throttle. The hi torque rotor adds alot of drag IMO, I didn't like it. As you can see opinions vary.
Jstall7543 is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:18 PM
  #5838  
BigBrute_347's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 146
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by bseckel
I made some changes yesterday to my truck and boy did it make a diffrance. I was having trouble getting the rear end to hook up. it would come around on me kind of easy. so yesterday before the races i changed the front sway bars to the 2.2 bars and the rear to the thinest bar, and changed the shocks to emultion with 35wt in front and 30 wt in rear, ran -1 degree camber in front and -2 in rear. truck was alot more planted and was really cosistant. set ride height at 25mm. truck was pulling crazy rear bumper wheelies. but stayed in control. now to tweek it a little more and this thing will be incredible.
Which of those changes do you think helped most? What type of track surface were you running on?
BigBrute_347 is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:25 PM
  #5839  
Cameron Kellogg's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,776
From: Idaho
Default

I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.
Cameron Kellogg is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:34 PM
  #5840  
1Fastpede's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,757
From: McKinney,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Cameron Kellogg
I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.
inner being A B or C ?
1Fastpede is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:38 PM
  #5841  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default SC 10 4x4 Chassis Brace Mod

Works great controlling fore & aft flex , easy to install...

125mm Ti Rod
Attached Thumbnails SC10 4x4 Thread-sc-10-4x4-chassis-brace-002.jpg   SC10 4x4 Thread-sc-10-4x4-chassis-brace-001.jpg  
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 06:38 PM
  #5842  
Cameron Kellogg's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,776
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by 1Fastpede
inner being A B or C ?
c I think, its the inner most one what ever that is.
Cameron Kellogg is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:10 PM
  #5843  
northkona's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 365
From: FNQ Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Works great controlling fore & aft flex , easy to install...

125mm Ti Rod
nice tidy job , just a thought , did you consider using the front overtray screw mount instead ? I know you will need a longer shaft = more weight etc. but I would like to avoid drilling more holes. Dont get me wrong , that looks factory , just the wheels in my head keep spinning.....
northkona is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:10 PM
  #5844  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by Jstall7543
I own all three motors, the ballistic 4.5 is faster than the 3800 in every way, the ballistic 5.5 is a closer match to the 3800kv. Add a little timing to the 5.5 or gear up a tooth or two or both. Watch your temps! The 4.5 and 5.5 also have way less drag off throttle. The hi torque rotor adds alot of drag IMO, I didn't like it. As you can see opinions vary.

I tryed gearing up it made it slower. When I gear down it is faster and more consistant I have not tryed any timing in the motor at all so maybe I will try that.
SHAUN GRIDER is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:15 PM
  #5845  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
Default

Anybod try adding weight to the middle chassis area

Trying to make it corner faster and land better
SHAUN GRIDER is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:25 PM
  #5846  
Wild Cherry's Avatar
Tech Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,595
From: TRCR Modified Driver
Default Chassis Brace Mod

[QUOTE=northkona;9494805]nice tidy job , just a thought , did you consider using the front overtray screw mount instead ? I know you will need a longer shaft = more weight etc. but I would like to avoid drilling more holes. Dont get me wrong , that looks factory , just the wheels in my head keep spinning.....[/QUOTE


Longer shaft required for the over tray mount method, and there are no Ti rods I know of long enough to span ...

Not all that big of a challenge to drill the hole for the nose plate, You do have to grind the ridge under the plate to mount a lock nut.

also grounded down a little the back stud mount on the rear trans brace.....
Attached Thumbnails SC10 4x4 Thread-sc-10-4x4-chassis-brace-001.jpg   SC10 4x4 Thread-sc-10-4x4-chassis-brace-003.jpg  

Last edited by Wild Cherry; 08-07-2011 at 07:36 PM.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:33 PM
  #5847  
pink_sleeve's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (224)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,153
From: Planet Melmac
Default

For you guys running these 540 motors i have a question. I tried a brand new never run 540 6.5 viper motor today geared 17/93 and it lasted literally 4 minutes of a 5 minute qualifier before going over 200 and melting down. No timing was used on the motor or speed control It felt awesome speed wise for the 4 minutes up until it cooked.
pink_sleeve is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:33 PM
  #5848  
rednck21's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (106)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,797
From: Kennesaw, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by Cameron Kellogg
I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.


thats what ive been struggling with since.....well, i built the truck ive tried changing shock angles, pistons, oil, ride height, swaybars....the back of the truck is just VERY loose. i havent changed the camber link on the rear hub (in the center hole), so i will try that. anyone have other ideas??
rednck21 is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:34 PM
  #5849  
northkona's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 365
From: FNQ Australia
Default

cheers, my diffs are due for service so I might check out the front mount while its apart.
northkona is offline  
Old 08-07-2011 | 07:45 PM
  #5850  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Works great controlling fore & aft flex , easy to install...

125mm Ti Rod
nice. i like that. i considered doing something with a large turnbuckle like that, but CF rods are so much lighter. however, yours is easier to work around if someone wants to run an under-body.
shadoflame is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.