SC10 4x4 Thread
#5836
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 427
I made some changes yesterday to my truck and boy did it make a diffrance. I was having trouble getting the rear end to hook up. it would come around on me kind of easy. so yesterday before the races i changed the front sway bars to the 2.2 bars and the rear to the thinest bar, and changed the shocks to emultion with 35wt in front and 30 wt in rear, ran -1 degree camber in front and -2 in rear. truck was alot more planted and was really cosistant. set ride height at 25mm. truck was pulling crazy rear bumper wheelies. but stayed in control. now to tweek it a little more and this thing will be incredible.
#5837
I own all three motors, the ballistic 4.5 is faster than the 3800 in every way, the ballistic 5.5 is a closer match to the 3800kv. Add a little timing to the 5.5 or gear up a tooth or two or both. Watch your temps! The 4.5 and 5.5 also have way less drag off throttle. The hi torque rotor adds alot of drag IMO, I didn't like it. As you can see opinions vary.
#5838
I made some changes yesterday to my truck and boy did it make a diffrance. I was having trouble getting the rear end to hook up. it would come around on me kind of easy. so yesterday before the races i changed the front sway bars to the 2.2 bars and the rear to the thinest bar, and changed the shocks to emultion with 35wt in front and 30 wt in rear, ran -1 degree camber in front and -2 in rear. truck was alot more planted and was really cosistant. set ride height at 25mm. truck was pulling crazy rear bumper wheelies. but stayed in control. now to tweek it a little more and this thing will be incredible.
#5839
I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.
#5840
I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.
#5843
nice tidy job , just a thought , did you consider using the front overtray screw mount instead ? I know you will need a longer shaft = more weight etc. but I would like to avoid drilling more holes. Dont get me wrong , that looks factory , just the wheels in my head keep spinning.....
#5844
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
I own all three motors, the ballistic 4.5 is faster than the 3800 in every way, the ballistic 5.5 is a closer match to the 3800kv. Add a little timing to the 5.5 or gear up a tooth or two or both. Watch your temps! The 4.5 and 5.5 also have way less drag off throttle. The hi torque rotor adds alot of drag IMO, I didn't like it. As you can see opinions vary.
I tryed gearing up it made it slower. When I gear down it is faster and more consistant I have not tryed any timing in the motor at all so maybe I will try that.
#5846
[QUOTE=northkona;9494805]nice tidy job , just a thought , did you consider using the front overtray screw mount instead ? I know you will need a longer shaft = more weight etc. but I would like to avoid drilling more holes. Dont get me wrong , that looks factory , just the wheels in my head keep spinning.....[/QUOTE
Longer shaft required for the over tray mount method, and there are no Ti rods I know of long enough to span ...
Not all that big of a challenge to drill the hole for the nose plate, You do have to grind the ridge under the plate to mount a lock nut.
also grounded down a little the back stud mount on the rear trans brace.....
Longer shaft required for the over tray mount method, and there are no Ti rods I know of long enough to span ...
Not all that big of a challenge to drill the hole for the nose plate, You do have to grind the ridge under the plate to mount a lock nut.
also grounded down a little the back stud mount on the rear trans brace.....
Last edited by Wild Cherry; 08-07-2011 at 07:36 PM.
#5847
For you guys running these 540 motors i have a question. I tried a brand new never run 540 6.5 viper motor today geared 17/93 and it lasted literally 4 minutes of a 5 minute qualifier before going over 200 and melting down. No timing was used on the motor or speed control
It felt awesome speed wise for the 4 minutes up until it cooked.
It felt awesome speed wise for the 4 minutes up until it cooked.
#5848
I had been fighting getting the rear to lock up better coming out of corners and around the sweeper before the straight. Changing the rear camber link to the inner hole on the rear hub helped more than springs and shock locations did. This is on a track with loose dirt on top so you slide around some anyway but the camber change made it more consistent to handle.
thats what ive been struggling with since.....well, i built the truck
ive tried changing shock angles, pistons, oil, ride height, swaybars....the back of the truck is just VERY loose. i havent changed the camber link on the rear hub (in the center hole), so i will try that. anyone have other ideas??
#5850
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 91
nice. i like that. i considered doing something with a large turnbuckle like that, but CF rods are so much lighter. however, yours is easier to work around if someone wants to run an under-body.



5Likes