1LikesTLR 22 Racing Buggy Thread
09-15-2011, 01:04 PM
#9872
hansie2 i have the tlr 22 in rear motor
I have the same problem as you, would you please send me your set up and a photo of how it fits the modification.
I need to know how to put the drive shaft (tlr2970) within outdrive (tlr2955)
sorry for my english.
thanks
I have the same problem as you, would you please send me your set up and a photo of how it fits the modification.
I need to know how to put the drive shaft (tlr2970) within outdrive (tlr2955)
sorry for my english.
thanks
09-15-2011, 02:49 PM
#9873
If I don't TQ and win the next time out this whole thread has been a waste. 
Corey should stop racing, Frank should apply at Walmart, and everyone that has ever posted should just be fill in's in the crowd on The Price Is Right!!!!
..................oh wait.....I actually still have to drive the well set up car
There's no right or wrong in this thread. It's all folks trying to help by giving their experiences with this AWESOME buggy in our WONDERFUL hobby
If my playful comments offended anyone......I'm giving out hugs in Modesto,Ca on Oct 1st
Thanks Corey for all the behind the scene help as well as the help on this thread. I'm no engineer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express
Corey should stop racing, Frank should apply at Walmart, and everyone that has ever posted should just be fill in's in the crowd on The Price Is Right!!!!..................oh wait.....I actually still have to drive the well set up car There's no right or wrong in this thread. It's all folks trying to help by giving their experiences with this AWESOME buggy in our WONDERFUL hobby If my playful comments offended anyone......I'm giving out hugs in Modesto,Ca on Oct 1stThanks Corey for all the behind the scene help as well as the help on this thread. I'm no engineer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express
09-15-2011, 02:53 PM
#9874
If I don't TQ and win the next time out this whole thread has been a waste. Corey should stop racing, Frank should apply at Walmart, and everyone that has ever posted should just be fill in's in the crowd on The Price Is Right!!!!..................oh wait.....I actually still have to drive the well set up car There's no right or wrong in this thread. It's all folks trying to help by giving their experiences with this AWESOME buggy in our WONDERFUL hobby If my playful comments offended anyone......I'm giving out hugs in Modesto,Ca on Oct 1st
Thanks Corey for all the behind the scene help as well as the help on this thread. I'm no engineer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express
Corey should stop racing, Frank should apply at Walmart, and everyone that has ever posted should just be fill in's in the crowd on The Price Is Right!!!!..................oh wait.....I actually still have to drive the well set up car There's no right or wrong in this thread. It's all folks trying to help by giving their experiences with this AWESOME buggy in our WONDERFUL hobby If my playful comments offended anyone......I'm giving out hugs in Modesto,Ca on Oct 1stThanks Corey for all the behind the scene help as well as the help on this thread. I'm no engineer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express
09-15-2011, 03:09 PM
#9876
Clint for pres. Hey almost got the 22 together... be a few more race days for me.
Hey almost got the 22 together... be a few more race days for me.
Mid motor... Zegers Paint
09-15-2011, 04:06 PM
#9880
Tech Regular
rear shock mount
Hey guys, you think the aluminum rear shock mount will add enough rear weight as adding the. 5z weight in the rear? As it shows on the setups between the diff case and tower.
09-15-2011, 04:13 PM
#9881
Its actually the exact opposite . . .
Less anti-squat gives more rear traction while accellerating on a slippery or dusty track.
It also gives more side-bite.
Less anti-squat will make the car accellerate better and faster through bumpy sections.
Very little anti-squat (0° or 1°) makes the rear end feel very stable. It also makes power sliding a lot easier.
More anti-squat generally makes the rear of the car more sensitive to throttle input.
The car has more steering while braking, and also a little more powering out of corners.
On high-traction tracks, it may feel as if the car momentarily has more rear traction accellerating out of corners.
A car with more anti-squat can also jump a little higher and further, and it will soak up bumps a little better, off-power.
A lot of anti-squat (4° or more) can make the car spin out in turns, and make the rear end break loose when accelleratin
Less anti-squat gives more rear traction while accellerating on a slippery or dusty track.
It also gives more side-bite.
Less anti-squat will make the car accellerate better and faster through bumpy sections.
Very little anti-squat (0° or 1°) makes the rear end feel very stable. It also makes power sliding a lot easier.
More anti-squat generally makes the rear of the car more sensitive to throttle input.
The car has more steering while braking, and also a little more powering out of corners.
On high-traction tracks, it may feel as if the car momentarily has more rear traction accellerating out of corners.
A car with more anti-squat can also jump a little higher and further, and it will soak up bumps a little better, off-power.
A lot of anti-squat (4° or more) can make the car spin out in turns, and make the rear end break loose when accelleratin
Anti-squat inhibits the transfer of weight to the front wheels during acceleration.
The Effect of Anti Squat Angle Changes
Increasing Anti-squat Angle
1. Increases rear traction during acceleration.
2. Reduces off-power traction.
3. Best used on smooth and/or slippery tracks.
Reducing Anti-Squat Angle
1. Reduces on-power traction.
2. Increases off-power traction.
3. Best used on rough and/or bumpy tracks.
09-15-2011, 05:29 PM
#9882
Pretty sure you have this backwards...
Anti-squat inhibits the transfer of weight to the front wheels during acceleration.
The Effect of Anti Squat Angle Changes
Increasing Anti-squat Angle
1. Increases rear traction during acceleration.
2. Reduces off-power traction.
3. Best used on smooth and/or slippery tracks.
Reducing Anti-Squat Angle
1. Reduces on-power traction.
2. Increases off-power traction.
3. Best used on rough and/or bumpy tracks.
Anti-squat inhibits the transfer of weight to the front wheels during acceleration.
The Effect of Anti Squat Angle Changes
Increasing Anti-squat Angle
1. Increases rear traction during acceleration.
2. Reduces off-power traction.
3. Best used on smooth and/or slippery tracks.
Reducing Anti-Squat Angle
1. Reduces on-power traction.
2. Increases off-power traction.
3. Best used on rough and/or bumpy tracks.
But I believe his definition is correct or at least it is what I have found from my testing.www.cenracing.com/race/setupguide.doc
09-15-2011, 05:41 PM
#9883
Suspended
iTrader: (7)
Pretty sure you have this backwards...
Anti-squat inhibits the transfer of weight to the front wheels during acceleration.
The Effect of Anti Squat Angle Changes
Increasing Anti-squat Angle
1. Increases rear traction during acceleration.
2. Reduces off-power traction.
3. Best used on smooth and/or slippery tracks.
Reducing Anti-Squat Angle
1. Reduces on-power traction.
2. Increases off-power traction.
3. Best used on rough and/or bumpy tracks.
Anti-squat inhibits the transfer of weight to the front wheels during acceleration.
The Effect of Anti Squat Angle Changes
Increasing Anti-squat Angle
1. Increases rear traction during acceleration.
2. Reduces off-power traction.
3. Best used on smooth and/or slippery tracks.
Reducing Anti-Squat Angle
1. Reduces on-power traction.
2. Increases off-power traction.
3. Best used on rough and/or bumpy tracks.
09-15-2011, 05:44 PM
#9884
His definition came verbatim from the tuning guide on CEN racing. Including the misspelled word But I believe his definition is correct or at least it is what I have found from my testing.
www.cenracing.com/race/setupguide.doc
But I believe his definition is correct or at least it is what I have found from my testing.www.cenracing.com/race/setupguide.doc
http://www.rc-truckncar-tuning.com/Anti-Squat.html
Last edited by celt; 09-15-2011 at 05:56 PM.
09-15-2011, 05:50 PM
#9885
No, he had it right. Lets think about this for a second. Weight does not transfer forward during acceleration (if so in a real car when you stomped on the gas you would fly into the steering wheel instead of being pushed into the seat), so there is no way that anti-squat can inhibit something that does not happen. What does happen when your car accelerates is weight transfer to the rear of the car this causes the rear suspension to squat. Anti-squat (as the name suggests) is an adjustment to prohibit the rearward weight transfer under acceleration. Less weight transfered means less traction. If my understanding is correct more anti-squat will allow the weight to transfer more easily towards the front of the car under deceleration, resulting in a greater loss of rear traction. As for which one to use on a bumpy track vs. a smooth track, I think you did get that part right. Please disreguard this post if you live in a parallel universe where physics are completeley different.
Anti-squat increases rear traction during acceleration.