Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Durango DEX210 Thread >

Durango DEX210 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree80Likes

Durango DEX210 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2013, 06:39 AM
  #11206  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
SKIMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tucson, az
Posts: 340
Trader Rating: 17 (95%+)
Default question

Is anyone running the shocks in the rear config. that are still using
standard chassis and rear motor config? Just wondering if they noticed
any benifits or not really. was thinking about swapping the shocks to the rear.
thanks for any input.
SKIMAN is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 06:51 AM
  #11207  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
SOuthernFRIED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Olive Branch,MS
Posts: 1,234
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

I am running rm4 with flipped arms, shocks to the rear. I noticed an immediate difference in stability. Buggy seems more settled overall.
SOuthernFRIED is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 07:07 AM
  #11208  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
RC10Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,938
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SOuthernFRIED
I am running rm4 with flipped arms, shocks to the rear. I noticed an immediate difference in stability. Buggy seems more settled overall.
Are you using the standard or a long chassis?

I would think for a mid motor configuration, you'd want the rear tires as close to the center of mass as possible to get more weight and therefore more traction on the rear wheels. Unfortunately this means keeping the wheelbase shorter. It's sort of the opposite for rear motor configurations. Pushing the rear tires back even further will help get the mass from the motor closer to being inside the wheelbase, thus reducing the pendulum effect.

Do you feel you have more or less rear traction after doing this mod? My thought process tells me you would have less, but then again the difference may be insignificant.
RC10Nick is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 07:36 AM
  #11209  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
SOuthernFRIED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Olive Branch,MS
Posts: 1,234
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

I am using the standard chassis. I haven't run mid-motor mainly because I run on outdoor loose dirt. You are correct in thinking in RM configuration the longer you make the wheelbase the more traction you gain. You also gain more stability when jumping. The trade off is, the longer you make something the more difficult it is to turn. I feel like I have better traction in my current configuration with the stock length chassis. Rear motor 4, flipped arms, and I have the hubs all the way to the rear. This is the longest possible wheelbase you can gain from the stock length chassis and it gives a very stable ride. After I swapped the arms and shifted the hubs the buggy became easier to drive out of corner's and i noticed it was more consistent going over jumps. I found I was less worried about lining everything up perfectly.. The buggy became more forgiving.
SOuthernFRIED is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 02:33 PM
  #11210  
Tech Master
iTrader: (36)
 
LoudOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,337
Trader Rating: 36 (100%+)
Default

Finally took a few shots of my DEX210... Ended up being my most expensive build yet... Exotek, Revolution Designs, LRP X-20 9.5 motor, Tekin RS esc... Paint by Larry at Kustom RC Graphics...






LoudOne is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 03:37 PM
  #11211  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
godofcable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spring Hill Fl
Posts: 2,022
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by LoudOne
Finally took a few shots of my DEX210... Ended up being my most expensive build yet... Exotek, Revolution Designs, LRP X-20 9.5 motor, Tekin RS esc... Paint by Larry at Kustom RC Graphics...
looks sweet!

you should build a 1/8 E Buggy, where the build can EASILY reach $1200
godofcable is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 06:36 AM
  #11212  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (57)
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,673
Trader Rating: 57 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Heavy B
Hope that helps with some discussion....
Thanks. It did.

Originally Posted by LoudOne
Finally took a few shots of my DEX210... Ended up being my most expensive build yet... Exotek, Revolution Designs, LRP X-20 9.5 motor, Tekin RS esc... Paint by Larry at Kustom RC Graphics...
What are you using from RDRP? Can't see in the pic. Spent all that and stuck with the stock chassis?
shagino is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 07:23 AM
  #11213  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
onekiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden but from New Zealand
Posts: 898
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

towers and by the look all the shock stuff you can get,
caps
retainers
preload
mounts
bottom caps
thumb screws
onekiwi is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 07:32 AM
  #11214  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (57)
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,673
Trader Rating: 57 (100%+)
Default

Ah. Thought a lot of that was actually exotek stuff.
shagino is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 08:56 AM
  #11215  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
onekiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden but from New Zealand
Posts: 898
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

ah sorry your right
onekiwi is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 10:24 AM
  #11216  
Tech Master
iTrader: (36)
 
LoudOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,337
Trader Rating: 36 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by shagino
Thanks. It did.



What are you using from RDRP? Can't see in the pic. Spent all that and stuck with the stock chassis?
RDRP are the Thumb screws, preload adjusters and the round side mounts... Everything else is Exotek... Can't say I'm an experienced enough driver to spend $$$ on a new chassis and notice a difference.. I think the stock chassis is just fine... It's one of the reasons I bought this car...
LoudOne is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 10:58 AM
  #11217  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (57)
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,673
Trader Rating: 57 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by LoudOne
RI think the stock chassis is just fine
It absolutely is. Just seems like a lot of folks(myself included) upgrade the chassis quickly. Since you dropped a lot of coin on this, I'm just surprised that one didn't get you
shagino is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 09:29 PM
  #11218  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 254
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default RDRP LRC KIT

anyone have any feedback on the lrc mounts for rm configuration? if so what chassis was used and what mount? thanks in advance.
glenng is offline  
Old 05-27-2013, 09:45 PM
  #11219  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
rcjunky1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,202
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

So I'll be getting a wrap for my buggy done by Mick at rctagz.com, so if anyone wants a wrap for there buggy, we'll have the die lines for the durango +8mm body in the near future. A local has one of his wraps already and it looks like good stuff, I look forward to getting mine in the near future (well, probably end of June as he needs a body to copy and that won't be in for another couple weeks)
rcjunky1 is offline  
Old 05-28-2013, 12:57 AM
  #11220  
Tech Apprentice
 
SCT4TEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 79
Default









SCT4TEN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.