Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Roar Region 8 off road champs >

Roar Region 8 off road champs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Roar Region 8 off road champs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2008, 02:59 PM
  #121  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Aaron P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas...unfortunately.
Posts: 3,420
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

<yawn>
Aaron P is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 03:53 PM
  #122  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,463
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Let's delete this thread.
David Alberico is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 04:46 PM
  #123  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Garden City, Kansas
Posts: 324
Default

I am plannin on being there for sure. Put in my time off and plan on 3 mod classes. Everyone beats me on those VRC games.
CodyJandrakovic is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 06:48 PM
  #124  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 190
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dawn Sanchez
yes, the Castle motors are a slotless design, which are 1) easier for a sensorless controller to drive, 2) provide two to four times the power of a ROAR style motor.

So let me get this straight. If I line my buggy up against another one with my sidewinder 4600 system and the other buggy has an lrp, novak, or orion system that has a 4.5 system in it, I will make it to the end of the straightaway 2 to 4 times faster?
camshaft is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 08:17 PM
  #125  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: O,Ne
Posts: 160
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default lousy lazy no good reg 8 director=me

Alright then, If you want to flame or point fingers I'm the guy. With a both a full time and part time job plus a wife I like to spend some time with my ROAR efforts are severely lacking. Whomever would like to take over let me know, I vote Alex.

A lot of good posts trying to achieve the goal of a big race where everyone has a good time and the top performer comes out on top.

My views;

When Billy asked me about this race we went with "Mod is Mod" thinking it would not incite drama. Billy told me tonight he has 20 guys that want to run mod with Castle stuff, that's a lot of guys to chase off because of rules excluding this product.

ROAR has rules to abide by, small and large,seemingly trivial to inciting debate on internet forums. I feel anyone who has run & won mod in Chillicothe did it with setup and driving, not pure horsepower.

Is the Castle motor an advantage? Maybe so, maybe not. Is it legal, no. A deviation to allow it is not like a deviation to allow the host track's locally popular class to be included in the event.

Billy wants as many racers as possible, he and his staff always put on a well run show, the competition is first rate. I hope all that attend have fun, whether racing or just spectating.
philb is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 08:29 PM
  #126  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 190
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default Hey Phil

So per roar rule 1.2.8 I believe, it is up to you. Or like the old saying says, the buck stops here. Does that mean that you are going to allow them and let the majority rule?

cam
camshaft is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 09:03 PM
  #127  
Regional Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
FroBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,671
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE]Whomever would like to take over let me know, I vote Alex.[QUOTE]


HAHAHA. NO WAY!

I vote Cam!
FroBoy is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 09:25 PM
  #128  
wyd
Tech Legend
iTrader: (51)
 
wyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dawn Sanchez
And that gives you a dog in this fight.....


HOW?
Well I guess since I do race for Castle and since supposedly ROAR is suppose to be for the racers and clearly that is untrue.

As for a fair playing field you have to be kidding me!!!!!!!!!!! Again like I said earlier you have pros running mod with parts racers can't get and that is fair since they have a ROAR legal motor........ again you are kidding me right.

I never seen a Castle motor have an advantage over an equivalent motor from another brand, why because it is mod and the Castle motors are for mod........No stock, not 17.5, not 13.5,not 10.5 but for mod!!!!!!!!!!!!! I never seen a Mamba 7700 be faster than a 2.5, 3.5, or a 4.5. Equal at best.
wyd is offline  
Old 08-13-2008, 10:47 PM
  #129  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Aaron P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas...unfortunately.
Posts: 3,420
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by philb
Billy told me tonight he has 20 guys that want to run mod with Castle stuff, that's a lot of guys to chase off because of rules excluding this product.
I think that 20 is a conservative number, IMHO. And you're saying "guys." Chances are...those "guys" would run more than one class too, so entry wise, the number just went up exponentially.
Aaron P is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 12:33 AM
  #130  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
glassdoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,250
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Seems to me that ROAR and others who are against these motors, are looking at it with a mentality of stock class. That's the only way I can understand anyone taking issue with the fact that the motor is built a little different. Why does it matter that a motor design may yield more horsepower? Also... if it's so superior then why were the rules written intentionally around an inferior design.

It's mod class... power should have nothing to do with a motor being legal. With that type of thinking, ROAR should ban things like 4.5 brushless and 7 single brushed??

I agree we should delete this thread, and then pretend it never happened and we can all go race and have a good time.
glassdoctor is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 12:52 AM
  #131  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
glassdoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,250
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dawn Sanchez
But to answer the question as to WHY: Castle Motors are of a slotless design, they are not rebuildable and their rotor dimensions are WAY outside of ROAR specs, which is a HUGE advantage over ROAR approved motors. Castle's been free to manufacture ROAR style motors from day one, BUT - their ESCs cannot run them accurately enough to be acceptable to the racers..... so I'm instructed.

Once the style of motor is allowed, you must understand, there is no way to control the power. Your looking for all of racing to become 100% motor dependent.. much like oval racing.. therefore, your asking for the slow death of RC racing because now costs have gone way overboard.

I think in the best interest of ROAR - we need to ensure costs to the MFG and the membership does not get out of hand... also, some kind of control on power, speed and advantage in order to ensure fairness to all. Sounds a little like NASCAR, eh?
Dawn,
thanks for giving some reasons why...

"they are not rebuildable"

That one I can kinda buy. Fair enough But the other reasons, not so much... unless we are talking a spec/stock class motor.

This is modified class...

If I'm reading your post correctly.... ROAR 's position is that allowing Castle's motors = costs to racers and mfgs are going to go out of control? And it's ROAR's place to assign a limit to power and speed of mod class racing? that's a strange thought to me.... trying to wrap my mind around that one.

oh well.... seems like a dead horse.... and seems to me very few agree wtih ROAR's position

I will email Castle suggesting they rework the can design, so it's rebuildable and has solder tabs. If they do that, maybe ROAR can meet them in the middle and overlook the subjective motor theory and design issues.

Die thread, die.....
glassdoctor is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:43 AM
  #132  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: O,Ne
Posts: 160
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Aaron P
I think that 20 is a conservative number, IMHO. And you're saying "guys." Chances are...those "guys" would run more than one class too, so entry wise, the number just went up exponentially.
Yes, a lot of entries will be affected as many run more than one class.
philb is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:48 AM
  #133  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: O,Ne
Posts: 160
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glassdoctor

It's mod class... power should have nothing to do with a motor being legal. With that type of thinking, ROAR should ban things like 4.5 brushless and 7 single brushed??

I agree we should delete this thread, and then pretend it never happened and we can all go race and have a good time.
As Billy and I thought running mod is how well you can use the horsepower.
philb is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:55 AM
  #134  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: O,Ne
Posts: 160
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by camshaft
So per roar rule 1.2.8 I believe, it is up to you. Or like the old saying says, the buck stops here. Does that mean that you are going to allow them and let the majority rule?

cam
OK by me, more entries the better,still not a legal motor by ROAR tho.
philb is offline  
Old 08-14-2008, 06:31 AM
  #135  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 190
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default phil

Yes you will allow them, or no you wont? Alot of us have to plan work, kids, life around this issue so a definitive answer here would be cool.

cam
camshaft is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.