Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree77Likes

TLR 22X-4 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2026 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,940
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by Cain
Good to see them looking to really get back into the racing side of things to maybe bring back the rivalries with AE. We have I think a couple of guys running the losi newer platforms by us to add to the variety we have at the track. Probably the only "complaint" in general I have heard is just the cost of the upgrade aluminum parts versus I think the brands they were running before like Ae I think, but losi has to make its money somehow too.
I agree, the cost of TLR aluminum is insane compared to AE.

Personally TLR is cheaper in the long run because I can't stand the blue aluminum parts on AE cars, so add about $200 onto the cost of the AE car for me to be happy.

I am quite happy with my new gen TLR cars. Kit quality is nice, and like previously stated the build is idiot proof.



Cain and HOTROD716 like this.
Cinnabun is offline  
Old 03-05-2026 | 10:08 AM
  #17  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 68
Default

Has anyone heard an ETA for the thick swaybars?





robbub is offline  
Old 03-05-2026 | 12:37 PM
  #18  
Tech Master
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,568
From: Indy
Default

Should be end of the month for the sways
robbub likes this.
AxiomJacob is offline  
Old 03-06-2026 | 07:01 AM
  #19  
Tech Master
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,737
From: Somewhere
Default

Thinking get back to racing after 3 yrs of absent and still have the first gen 22x-4 and would like to know if others parts still fit with the older one? My first 22x4 still in carbon fiber chassis which is a like and i have 2 of them for spare and bunch of spare. I almost sell since someone advice me to keep it you'll never if you coming back again and now i'm itching back to racing again
raved007 is offline  
Old 03-06-2026 | 09:27 AM
  #20  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 75
From: MN
Default Backwards Compatibility

There is a lot of difference with the car.

Chassis:
The chassis has been significantly extended. It is cut differently at the front for the new side guards.

Three of the mounting holes for the front of the chassis have changed leading up to the center diff/slipper. The first hole for the servo mount is no longer countersunk; the new servo mount used a pin instead of a screw for the first mounting hole. The front two mounting holes for the side guards are several millimeters back to accommodate the new side guards (you will not be able to use the new side guards on a 1.0 without upgrading the chassis).

The mounting hole for everything after the diff/slipper has been shifted back but looks to all be the same (my guess is it’s dependent on the chassis length; the -3 chassis is likely 1:1 to the 1.0 chassis besides those 3 holes mentioned earlier).

Steering is all the same.


Servo Mount:

Completely new. Looks like it would fit, but I didn’t try it. You’d likely have to drill a hole in the 1.0 side guard to get the servo mount to fit.


Center Diff/Slipper:

Mounting holes are all the same. DC, no issues; exactly the same as 1.0.

It will likely be difficult to swap to the new Decoupled slipper in a 1.0 car. New front mount that requires the new servo mount to be used. Might fit using the same tricks to get the AE decoupled slipper to fit.


Shocks:

The shocks are almost all new.

Shock ends, shafts, caps, and x-rings are backwards compatible with the 1.0.

If you already upgraded to 13mm shocks (AVID, or another brand), there is no point in upgrading. If stuck on the 12mm, the 13s are noticeably better.

Shock towers are different to accommodate the diff height adjustment of the new gearboxes. The mounting holes are the same, so they should fit the 1.0. The 1.0 Shock towers will not fit a 2.0.


Arms:

The arms are redesigned. The front arms are now a Gullwing style. The rears are the same but have a different molding to accommodate the 22x.

Both are backwards compatible, but you will need a -2 front tower to maintain droop for the front arms.


Roll Center:

The ABCD blocks are the same, besides the new blocks C&D blocks on the AC.

If you have the Vision Racing C&D blocks, they are the same as the new AC C&D blocks.

New front castor block, only difference is it’s adjustable. It should be backwards compatible.

The sway bars are new but using the same part number.

The turnbuckle rod end and ball ends are larger, but are backwards compatible.


Diffs:

The ring and pinion of the diffs are the same. The pinion appears to be of higher quality than the 1.0.

The diff cup is different but should swap into the original gear box with no issue.


F&R Gearboxes:

The #1 question is the 1.0 gearboxes have been discontinued for some time.

The gearboxes are backwards compatible, but require a lot of additional parts to fit.

You’ll need the following to get them to fit:
It’s a lot but still cheaper to keep your current car running than buying a new car. On the bright side the new gearboxes are a clear upgrade over the original car.


If you’re running a DC, it could be economical to slowly upgrade it to a 2.0 hybrid. Especially if you’re running on loose dirt and not high-traction clay, then the big upgrade to the extended chassis won’t be worth it.

If you’re running on Carpet/Astro, it’s likely best to get the new car. Unless you’ve done the AE decoupled slipper mod and Vision Racing +5mm chassis, the gearboxes and arms will get you 90% of the 2.0. Otherwise, there is too much, and these upgrades are ones that make a night-and-day difference on an AC car.

Last edited by B-woo; 03-06-2026 at 09:50 AM.
B-woo is offline  
Old 03-08-2026 | 05:09 PM
  #21  
fpart's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,104
From: FL
Default

does anyone make a spool for the 22x4 2.0?
fpart is offline  
Old 03-20-2026 | 09:35 PM
  #22  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 452
From: Austin TX
Default

Building my 22x-4 2.0.

Getting binding in the steering. The ball cup seems to hit the steering rack and bind getting close to fill throw.
Using the aluminum ackermann plate.

Anyone else have this issue?



Last edited by ATXPro4; 03-20-2026 at 09:36 PM. Reason: Adding pictures
ATXPro4 is offline  
Old 03-20-2026 | 10:55 PM
  #23  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 75
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by fpart
does anyone make a spool for the 22x4 2.0?
The 1.0 spool from Vision Racing or Exotek would work. You’ll need the right front bulkhead and drive shaft.
B-woo is offline  
Old 03-20-2026 | 10:59 PM
  #24  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 75
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by ATXPro4
Building my 22x-4 2.0.

Getting binding in the steering. The ball cup seems to hit the steering rack and bind getting close to fill throw.
Using the aluminum ackermann plate.

Anyone else have this issue?

That’s the V2 drag link (TLR331061). It does not appear to be listed as compatible with the 2.0. It’s narrower than the one used on the 2.0.

You need TLR331052. I’m running it with no issues.
B-woo is offline  
Old 03-21-2026 | 02:13 AM
  #25  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 452
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by B-woo
That’s the V2 drag link (TLR331061). It does not appear to be listed as compatible with the 2.0. It’s narrower than the one used on the 2.0.

You need TLR331052. I’m running it with no issues.
good to know, this is the one the LHS I race at gave me. I’ll be taking it back.

update, the stock one works perfect. Will be swapping out with the v1.
Flipside6900 and ThisIsRDG like this.

Last edited by ATXPro4; 03-21-2026 at 08:32 AM.
ATXPro4 is offline  
Old 03-22-2026 | 06:25 AM
  #26  
Matt M.'s Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,678
Default

Originally Posted by ATXPro4
good to know, this is the one the LHS I race at gave me. I’ll be taking it back.

update, the stock one works perfect. Will be swapping out with the v1.
v2 will work, just releive a little of the plastic, steering parts, it hits due to the larger ball studs. 2 min job with a dremel
wydopen likes this.
Matt M. is offline  
Old 03-24-2026 | 01:04 PM
  #27  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by robbub
Has anyone heard an ETA for the thick swaybars?



Front and rear are back in stock at HH. I ordered mine on Monday, will be to me by Wed, Thursday at the latest.
HOTROD716 is offline  
Old 03-26-2026 | 06:47 PM
  #28  
Matt M.'s Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,678
Default

Originally Posted by HOTROD716
Front and rear are back in stock at HH. I ordered mine on Monday, will be to me by Wed, Thursday at the latest.
in stock now...mine arrived today
HOTROD716 likes this.
Matt M. is offline  
Old 04-06-2026 | 06:57 AM
  #29  
fpart's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,104
From: FL
Default

Has anyone tried running the center diff in the forward position yet on the dirt car? I think the xray and b84 are more forward than the 22x5 2.0.
fpart is offline  
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:24 AM
  #30  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by fpart
Has anyone tried running the center diff in the forward position yet on the dirt car? I think the xray and b84 are more forward than the 22x5 2.0.
I can tell you the B84 diff/motor is not more forward. I will try to run the diff forward when I go to Hooiser at some point this summer/fall.
fpart likes this.
HOTROD716 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.