MadMick

iTrader: (1)

Can you run 17mm hexs

tosouthern66

Now I am starting to doubt this truck! We need a race platform not a damn basher! The SL is ok but it lacks durability with the bulkheads breaking. Still waiting for ProStar to send out the new aluminum bulk heads! I like the SL it is faster and a lot more agile than the original 410's but doesnt take much to get tossed around on the track. We do not have an indoor high bite track so a heavier race platform would be better. Now I need to decide if I cancel my order!

Matthew_Armeni

iTrader: (31)

There will be optional 17mm hexes and universal driveshafts.

rustyus

iTrader: (1)

You have doubts, because I posted something about someone stating the SCT410 2.0 is more 1/8 scale than it's predecessor? You are doubting what?

tosouthern66

On if it is going to be good enough to race. I like that it looks beefier especially the shock towers being thicker, maybe they wont bend as easy as the 410 and 410.3

RazorRC

iTrader: (5)

He is doubting whether he should purchase one.

ta_man

iTrader: (168)

Good to know. I was going to ask about this. But the follow on question is: will the hubs be of an offset that gives the same track width using the DE 17MM Hex SCT wheels as when using the 12MM offset wheels designed for this truck?

slick2500

iTrader: (1)

Does this share any parts with the N/E48 2.x?

rustyus

iTrader: (1)

I think you'll be pleased...SCT410 2.0 Description

From Tekno's description of the platform: The SCT410 2.0 focuses on durability and drivetrain strength, boasting a 2 to 4S compatibility out of the box. With hardened steel universal driveshafts, outdrives, and stub axles, this vehicle is designed to endure even the most demanding conditions. The modular design provides compatibility with hundreds of various parts and options from the EB/NB/ET/NT48 2.X line of vehicles, allowing enthusiasts and racers to personalize it to their driving styles and tastes.

Featuring a revised chassis design and layout, the SCT410 2.0 includes HD mudguards, a covered center diff, and easy access differentials, enhancing its strength and ease of maintenance. The incorporation of new 2.X compatible bulkheads, new internal differential gears, and SCT-specific suspension geometry, demonstrates Tekno RC’s commitment to delivering exceptional performance to RC enthusiasts.

Typpo

Shock Lengths
Based on the manuals, the new front and rear shock lengths are 98mm and 108mm respectively. For comparison, the SCT410.3 16mm front and rear shock lengths are 105mm and 118mm.

Will Tekno offer a shorter (meaning shorter than the TKR6002, TKR6004 and TKR6143 combination) 16mm shock option?

Front and Rear Suspension Arm Compatibility
Also, can the new front and rear arms fit between the blocks (hinge pin braces) of the old series one vehicles (e.g. EB48.2, EB48.3, SCT410.3)?

Matthew_Armeni

iTrader: (31)

Yes, there will be hexes that offer the SC width as well as a wider hex that will bring the width up to 8th scale buggy specs.

Matthew_Armeni

iTrader: (31)

The 13mm shocks offer a greater range of travel (full compression to full extension) than the 16mm shocks are capable of. So while you can fit on the 16mm shocks, you will end up limiting your uptravel or your droop when doing so. During testing, we had various length bodies and shafts as well as different height towers to compensate for all of these scenarios to give each setup (13mm versus 16mm) the best possible chance. The 13mm simply performed better. If there's enough demand we could eventually make 16mm specific shocks for this vehicle, but I truly believe that once everyone drives the truck they won't be wishing for the larger shocks.

The 2.0 platform uses much narrower A,B,C,D blocks than the previous generation. There might be some combination of parts/driveshafts on the rear that work out to fit correctly, but I don't think it's worth trying to figure out.

Typpo

Thank you for describing the differences between the 13mm and 16mm shocks and for providing details about testing.

That difference between the series one and series two platform A, B, C, and D blocks is also appreciated and helpful.

smirkracing

iTrader: (19)

Matthew_Armeni can you also discuss the motor mount a little? What were some of the design trade-offs and considerations?

What is the procedure for changing the motor and / or the pinion?

thanks!!

Matthew_Armeni

iTrader: (31)

The biggest negatives to the one piece motor mount are complete motor access, pinion gear options, and gearing changes. Removing the motor isn't hard to do, it's just more involved. Space constraints force a limited number of pinion gear options on the mount. We wanted to limit the amount of mounts to two, so we have a low range (12-16) and a high range (16-20). Changing the gearing by changing the pinion is again, not hard to do, it's just more involved.

The positives to the one piece design are several. It's cheaper to manufacture, which allows us to price the kit lower. It prevents customers who are less experienced from setting the gear mesh too loose and possibly stripping out spur gears. On the flip side it also prevents customers from setting the mesh too tight and having the motor/esc run hot. It easily allows for a sealed driveline, which customers have been requesting for some time now. It's 2 less screws to have loosen during a run, so it's actually more secure than our adjustable mount.

To remove the motor or change to a different tooth count pinion I like to take off the center diff top plate and the pinion gear access cover. Then I remove the center diff. Then I remove the motor mount from the chassis along with the center brace. If you're simply changing the pinion to one with the same tooth count you can just remove the access cover.