Adelaide Nitro Offroad Racing Club
#155
Originally Posted by Integrated
Hey Glen,
do you have a picture that shows the proposed extensions for the track when we get a bobcat in the future?
do you have a picture that shows the proposed extensions for the track when we get a bobcat in the future?
extremely crude, slapped up job but it should give you a basic idea of what im planning.
if anyone has any suggestions for the infield im all ears, but remember- we cant extend out the back straight and we need to keep maximum width thru the infield..
our previous temporary track changes wasted 1/3rd of the available width with that huge grass loop on the main straight and the wasted triangle? at the heart of the infield.
the width of the main straight will be the minimum width around the entire track including the infield.
#156
or we could possibly go with somethin like this, but remember- main straight and hairpin cant be changed, and most likely the table top too since its a major job to relocate it.
downside to these layouts is theres nowhere to get speed up for any decent jumps. the existing layout has longer infield straights which will allow us to put some knee - waist high jumps in..
[img][/img]
downside to these layouts is theres nowhere to get speed up for any decent jumps. the existing layout has longer infield straights which will allow us to put some knee - waist high jumps in..
[img][/img]
#157
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
Im not a fan of widening the raised section still, I still think its a waste of dirt that can be used for jumps, berms and off camber corners. The whole area can be lowered rather than raised and widened at the same time.
I think the back straight should have at least one large double on it, or even a triple. A drop off is too simple to drive off, at least a jump is a challenge to get right and clear.
The middle section of the track doesnt need to be much wider, in those pictures it looks like it would be about 5 meters wide - too much if you ask me. Its all out of proportion with the rest of the track. 3.5meters is about the standard of tracks world wide that are used with trucks and buggies, i dont see much need to go wider than that.
More jumps and perhaps a ripple section are what the track needs. Spectators (and racers!) love to see flying buggies and trucks
If possible, I think we should extend the track up a few more meters past those seats to the right of the drivers stand, and a few more meters to the other end too if possible I might be draming though, I dont know what the exact land size we have available for our use is.
I think the back straight should have at least one large double on it, or even a triple. A drop off is too simple to drive off, at least a jump is a challenge to get right and clear.
The middle section of the track doesnt need to be much wider, in those pictures it looks like it would be about 5 meters wide - too much if you ask me. Its all out of proportion with the rest of the track. 3.5meters is about the standard of tracks world wide that are used with trucks and buggies, i dont see much need to go wider than that.
More jumps and perhaps a ripple section are what the track needs. Spectators (and racers!) love to see flying buggies and trucks
If possible, I think we should extend the track up a few more meters past those seats to the right of the drivers stand, and a few more meters to the other end too if possible I might be draming though, I dont know what the exact land size we have available for our use is.
#158
Originally Posted by v0rtex
Im not a fan of widening the raised section still, I still think its a waste of dirt that can be used for jumps, berms and off camber corners. The whole area can be lowered rather than raised and widened at the same time.
if we level the raised section of track then we end up with a 90% flat track. (yawn)
i have got multiple truckloads of dirt aswell as all the dirt that will come from the hairpin extension will all provide more dirt than we will need. the end of the track will be extended to compensate for the few feet we lose on the infield.
Originally Posted by v0rtex
The middle section of the track doesnt need to be much wider, in those pictures it looks like it would be about 5 meters wide - too much if you ask me. Its all out of proportion with the rest of the track. 3.5meters is about the standard of tracks world wide that are used with trucks and buggies, i dont see much need to go wider than that.
Originally Posted by Oblivion
extremely crude, slapped up job but it should give you a basic idea of what im planning.
Originally Posted by Oblivion
the width of the main straight will be the minimum width around the entire track including the infield.
Originally Posted by v0rtex
If possible, I think we should extend the track up a few more meters past those seats to the right of the drivers stand, and a few more meters to the other end too if possible I might be draming though, I dont know what the exact land size we have available for our use is.
#159
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
maybe a stepdown jump instead of a drop off at the end of the table will be better, a small jump over a gap onto a landing, basically a double with the take off side higher than the landing side. it changes the level and adds a bit of spectacle to it. i'm in favout of a double on the 1st infield straight & moguls on the second.
only problem i can see with all these changes is drainage. we must consider that 1st. maybe we should take a few planks of wood & a spirit level with us to make sure water drains out away from the centre of the track to stop pools forming.
just my 2 cents
only problem i can see with all these changes is drainage. we must consider that 1st. maybe we should take a few planks of wood & a spirit level with us to make sure water drains out away from the centre of the track to stop pools forming.
just my 2 cents
#160
Originally Posted by promugenman
maybe a stepdown jump instead of a drop off at the end of the table will be better, a small jump over a gap onto a landing, basically a double with the take off side higher than the landing side. it changes the level and adds a bit of spectacle to it. i'm in favout of a double on the 1st infield straight & moguls on the second.
only problem i can see with all these changes is drainage. we must consider that 1st. maybe we should take a few planks of wood & a spirit level with us to make sure water drains out away from the centre of the track to stop pools forming.
just my 2 cents
only problem i can see with all these changes is drainage. we must consider that 1st. maybe we should take a few planks of wood & a spirit level with us to make sure water drains out away from the centre of the track to stop pools forming.
just my 2 cents
drainage is something i never thought of.. actually - maybe when we use ag pipe down the main straight it can double as drain pipe??
#162
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by oblivion
but your never a fan of anything we plan.
if we level the raised section of track then we end up with a 90% flat track. (yawn)
if we level the raised section of track then we end up with a 90% flat track. (yawn)
#165
I like the sound of that gap jump.
Another reason for having the back section of the track raised is to assist in seeing the track. It makes the cars easier to see over the rest of the track.
Another reason for having the back section of the track raised is to assist in seeing the track. It makes the cars easier to see over the rest of the track.