NEW HOBBYWING STOCK SUPERCHARGED SOFTWARE
#6931
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
I ran my 5.5T as well my 8.5T with the 930 stock this time with lipo protection on 3.0v/cell and after a couple of minutes the voltage protection kicks again.Batteries are Gens Ace 5000mAh 50C and i have run them only a few times.The only way to go is to disable the voltage protection but it's too risky.A couple of guys with the SP speedo (with the SP 323stock s/w) but SP 4.5T motors and more agressive settings don't have this issue.I'm not sure why this happens but for sure the new 930 s/w didn't help.
#6932
It seems like its your batteries as to be honest you need atleast a 50c true value to run 3.5t motors as the current draw on a 3.5t is massive.or else something is dragging that pack down very quickly but im sure its the battery
#6933
#6934
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
On 119, turbo will kick in after you've hit the throttle delay, regardless of where the additional timing is in relation to boost.
On 211/930 turbo will only kick in after the throttle delay and all the boost timing has been added.
In terms of slope, no, this isn't altered... as it is added in (for both turbo and boost) in relation to other factors.
Boost is added in steps per rpm, (step/rpm) turbo in steps per tenth of a second (step/0.1s). So the rate of addition of boost will be the same regardless of when it kicks in.
However, if you use less boost, then (assuming you've used up all the boost timing by the time the throttle delay hits), then the turbo will come in a little earlier.
HiH
Ed
#6935
Tech Regular
#6936
Keep roll-out / FDR as suggested by LRP.
Many people say/think, because the X12 is a high timing motor that it should scream, but in fact you should gear it a bit heavier then other motors, because it has a lot of bottom power!....
In 12th scale 10.5T I drive 44mm
In 12th scale 13.5T I drive 53mm....
#6937
Tech Adept
Should have said, using 211.
At the mo I have;
Slope 18
Boost 30
Turbo 30
Turbo delay off
Turbo punch 200
I want the turbo to come in earlier because of the length of our straight, about 25 meters, so i was going to turn down the boost and up the turbo?
QUOTE=TryHard;9911147]Depends on the software...
On 119, turbo will kick in after you've hit the throttle delay, regardless of where the additional timing is in relation to boost.
On 211/930 turbo will only kick in after the throttle delay and all the boost timing has been added.
In terms of slope, no, this isn't altered... as it is added in (for both turbo and boost) in relation to other factors.
Boost is added in steps per rpm, (step/rpm) turbo in steps per tenth of a second (step/0.1s). So the rate of addition of boost will be the same regardless of when it kicks in.
However, if you use less boost, then (assuming you've used up all the boost timing by the time the throttle delay hits), then the turbo will come in a little earlier.
HiH
Ed[/QUOTE]
At the mo I have;
Slope 18
Boost 30
Turbo 30
Turbo delay off
Turbo punch 200
I want the turbo to come in earlier because of the length of our straight, about 25 meters, so i was going to turn down the boost and up the turbo?
QUOTE=TryHard;9911147]Depends on the software...
On 119, turbo will kick in after you've hit the throttle delay, regardless of where the additional timing is in relation to boost.
On 211/930 turbo will only kick in after the throttle delay and all the boost timing has been added.
In terms of slope, no, this isn't altered... as it is added in (for both turbo and boost) in relation to other factors.
Boost is added in steps per rpm, (step/rpm) turbo in steps per tenth of a second (step/0.1s). So the rate of addition of boost will be the same regardless of when it kicks in.
However, if you use less boost, then (assuming you've used up all the boost timing by the time the throttle delay hits), then the turbo will come in a little earlier.
HiH
Ed[/QUOTE]
#6938
I have tried this combo with 930 and it is very fast just unreliable.
When I was griding up and came to a stop with brakes on the car would go backwards once I pulled the throttle!
Reverse was not set!!
If you got spun around and rolled backwards the speedy would go to sensorless!
I tried all variable's of timming on the speeedy and motor to no avail...
The hobbywing claim is that the signal from the X12's is not strong so as the speedy cannot pickup where it is in relation to sensor position.
Cobra Racing did say he would look into it further in a post I submitted weeks ago... Still nothing.
When I was griding up and came to a stop with brakes on the car would go backwards once I pulled the throttle!
Reverse was not set!!
If you got spun around and rolled backwards the speedy would go to sensorless!
I tried all variable's of timming on the speeedy and motor to no avail...
The hobbywing claim is that the signal from the X12's is not strong so as the speedy cannot pickup where it is in relation to sensor position.
Cobra Racing did say he would look into it further in a post I submitted weeks ago... Still nothing.
Your issue is your motor running backwards when you apply the brakes and when you spin around it rolls backwards it goes into error .I suggest you recal your radio as from what your telling me i cant see it being a software issue related to the esc .
Please email me or skype me or even msn and we can work through it even on video conference like i do with so many hobbywing users .
[email protected]
or skype
teamcobraracing.
thanks
Last edited by COBRARACING; 11-15-2011 at 02:57 AM.
#6940
Tech Adept
I've got the boost timing starting at 5 thousand already. I thought that was pretty low!
#6942
Tech Adept
#6943
Because the X12 with the 4 dots insert is already om 27.5 (thank you Manson) degree of timing, maybe a later boost start RPM will actually give you more performance.....
Let the punch setting of the ESC do it's work before starting to add boost timing.....
Now I don't know the set timing of your GM, but maybe it's around the same as the LRP?
It's worth a try, or not?
A fellow racer is stopped running with his GM motor, because it started running sensorless or something like that, I didn't really spend time to try and help to solve his problem, but maybe he was also giving to much timing to fast.....
Last edited by M7H; 11-15-2011 at 12:58 PM. Reason: Mistake by me, 37,5 should have been 27,5......
#6944
Tech Adept
4 dot on lrp = 27.5, not 37
#6945
Tech Regular
HW Extreme Stock or HW 120A 1S
Powered by 2s lipo, a brushless motor runs at 120000 RPM. Can you believe it is only a normal 11.5T stock motor?
Normally, it should runs at 26000RPM. 120000 RPM is really incredible!
But we are not making a joke. Hobbywing just released a Beta version firmware for 1/10 on-road stock applications. It is an innovation for Stock technology!
If you have Hobbywing XERUN-120A (V2.0) or XERUN-60A (V2.0) ESC, and a LCD program box, you can download the new firmware freely at the following hyperlinks. You needn't buy a new ESC at all. Just save your money!
New Stock Firmware:
http://www.hobbywing.com/upload/soft...eta_100429.rar
The instrcutions of this new firmware:
http://www.hobbywing.com/upload/manu...-Hobbywing.pdf
Try it, and Trust it! (TNT ?! Yes!!! )
Let's enjoy the fastest speeeeeeeeed!!!
Normally, it should runs at 26000RPM. 120000 RPM is really incredible!
But we are not making a joke. Hobbywing just released a Beta version firmware for 1/10 on-road stock applications. It is an innovation for Stock technology!
If you have Hobbywing XERUN-120A (V2.0) or XERUN-60A (V2.0) ESC, and a LCD program box, you can download the new firmware freely at the following hyperlinks. You needn't buy a new ESC at all. Just save your money!
New Stock Firmware:
http://www.hobbywing.com/upload/soft...eta_100429.rar
The instrcutions of this new firmware:
http://www.hobbywing.com/upload/manu...-Hobbywing.pdf
Try it, and Trust it! (TNT ?! Yes!!! )
Let's enjoy the fastest speeeeeeeeed!!!
I want to race WGT 1S LiPo 10.5t
What HW esc best to use.
HW 120A 1S seems to be the obvious choice. But it is a bit heavy.
Would the HW Extreme Stock work? Knowing that is isn't a 1S esc, but 2S-3S.
Would that be a problem?
Could it work with this booster: http://www.carsrcracing.co.uk/?p=183
The HW Extreme Stock seems interesting because it is lighter than the HW 120A 1S. But I have heard of problems with the HW Extreme Stock when using 1S LiPo and booster. Is that common? Something to do with the software?
In the specs it says that HW 120A 1S weighs 105g. Someone told me that that is including wires. What does it weigh without wires?
Weight is of the utmost importance for me because I want to be as close to the limit as possible (930g) with a XRay X10 Link and 1S LiPo and mini or micro servo and wires as short as possible. Would 930g be possible with the HW 120A 1S?