Vision Racing Products (VRP)
#316
I like the feel of more holes/smaller holes when there is more grip. If it was bumpy but still high grip, i would still prefer a 3 hole over a 2 hole on the B6. But again, thats just my personal preference. The 3 hole just seems to make the car more stable in my opinion.
#317
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
I like the feel of more holes/smaller holes when there is more grip. If it was bumpy but still high grip, i would still prefer a 3 hole over a 2 hole on the B6. But again, thats just my personal preference. The 3 hole just seems to make the car more stable in my opinion.
#320
Short answer to your question: There is no difference or advantages between a flat or tapered piston. I have never seen in any of my data, not low speed, not high speed, not pack, not reversing them, not anything that suggests there is anything special about a tapered piston.
You can achieve the same results between them though choosing oil viscosity. The only difference is that given the same hole # and diameter (i.e. 5H 1.3mm) piston with the same viscosity oil, a tapered piston will move with less resistance. This is due to the thinner piston. You can achieve this same effect with lower viscosity oil with a standard flat piston.
Much talk is spread about how a tapered piston will slip through the oil faster in one direction than another (faster rebound if taper side is down), but this is again nonsense. I've flipped pistons several times, and never once seen a difference in rebound vs compression values. I think most people's opinions are based either on placebo effect, or that they are getting less overall damping due to the thinner piston, but attributing it to a "faster rebound".
Take a look at my shock dyno results. The link is in my signature.
#321
Typically a tapered piston works better on tracks that are not smooth. If you have a bumpy track, sometimes tapered pistons work a bit better due to having less pack. By having less pack, this allows them to go through the bumpy sections a bit better.