Team Associated TC5
#976
Rick Hohwart
Hey Rick, just going thru some old issues of rc car mags, and when they profiled you when you where running the MSX what tape are you using to hold the cells in, whats the name and where can it be bought? Thanks JW.
#977
Tech Elite
iTrader: (95)
Originally Posted by Dasupacat1
I expected more from AE than this.
Maybe they will pull something magical out and come up with some innovation that we haven't seen before. As of now, this car is a total non-starter for me.
#978
Originally Posted by Johnny Wishbone
Hey Rick, just going thru some old issues of rc car mags, and when they profiled you when you where running the MSX what tape are you using to hold the cells in, whats the name and where can it be bought? Thanks JW.
#979
Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
Sadly it's what I've come to expect. No wonder they didn't want pictures to get out...the car is utterly unimpressive.
Maybe they will pull something magical out and come up with some innovation that we haven't seen before. As of now, this car is a total non-starter for me.
Maybe they will pull something magical out and come up with some innovation that we haven't seen before. As of now, this car is a total non-starter for me.
This car is a prototype built for function rather than form and is only a representation of what the production version will look like. And trust me, it will look as high tech and impressive as any of its competitors.
Regardless, the car handles extremely well, is very easy to drive, and easy to maintain. When you factor in excellent spare parts availability at economical prices, you have a winner.
#980
Rick Hohwart
Thanks for the info, I'll try that. JW.
#981
Tech Elite
iTrader: (95)
Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart
Didn't anyone ever teach you guys not to judge a book by its cover?
This car is a prototype built for function rather than form and is only a representation of what the production version will look like. And trust me, it will look as high tech and impressive as any of its competitors.
Regardless, the car handles extremely well, is very easy to drive, and easy to maintain. When you factor in excellent spare parts availability at economical prices, you have a winner.
This car is a prototype built for function rather than form and is only a representation of what the production version will look like. And trust me, it will look as high tech and impressive as any of its competitors.
Regardless, the car handles extremely well, is very easy to drive, and easy to maintain. When you factor in excellent spare parts availability at economical prices, you have a winner.
#982
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by Johnny Wishbone
Thanks for the info, I'll try that. JW.
http://www.speedtechrc.com/store/ebp...nid=327&id=835
Hope that helps,
They have other colors as well.
-Shookie <><
Oh and all the haters....
Like Rick said Just wait,
Ae has always put out quality and a race winning performance for many years.
I have seen the car in action and yes it is as fast and any other TC out there...
Excited to see when it gets to full production..
#984
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
Boy... tough crowd If the car was radically different than the norm.. like the JRSX... everyone would bash the car and say it wont work and it should be more like the other cars... if it follows the form of the popular cars everyone cries thats its not different and its just a clone
#985
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
Originally Posted by ottoman
Boy... tough crowd If the car was radically different than the norm.. like the JRSX... everyone would bash the car and say it wont work and it should be more like the other cars... if it follows the form of the popular cars everyone cries thats its not different and its just a clone
#986
The Evicerator
Rick Dawg, you racing tomorrow??
#987
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by ottoman
Boy... tough crowd If the car was radically different than the norm.. like the JRSX... everyone would bash the car and say it wont work and it should be more like the other cars... if it follows the form of the popular cars everyone cries thats its not different and its just a clone
When we did the TC3 and it's shaft drive configuration, everyone said it was a bad idea...like the Tenth Technology Predator. When it worked and started winning, everyone copied it, or made their versions of it. Shaft drive is proving NOT to be so superior and now that we are trying to get into the belt drive config, there are HOW MANY TC companies out there????? Let's see.
Tamiya
Hot Bodies/HPI
Losi
Corally
XRay
Kyosho
Yokomo
and more?!?!?!?
Don't these cars already sort of resemble one another (ok, except the Losi, but it does have 4 wheels, 2 belts, 2 diffs, dogbones, a motor plate, etc etc).
Point is, everyone already has a dialed in belt car. We don't. We NEED one...the problem is getting something on the market that WORKS, not just releasing something that looks different and sucks ass on the track. We're not a suck-ass-on-the-track company. So, yeah, it may resemble the top-notch cars but that's what works. And that will get us in the winners circle...well, HOPEFULLY that will get us in the winners circle!!!!
Now, for our NEXT TC we can do something different....something out of the ordinary and be ok....we'll have our 'winning' design already established.
#988
Originally Posted by Evicerator
Rick Dawg, you racing tomorrow??
#989
I hope AE will look at all the small design details that...
Originally Posted by TPhalen
Finally someone that makes sense.
When we did the TC3 and it's shaft drive configuration, everyone said it was a bad idea...like the Tenth Technology Predator. When it worked and started winning, everyone copied it, or made their versions of it. Shaft drive is proving NOT to be so superior and now that we are trying to get into the belt drive config, there are HOW MANY TC companies out there????? Let's see.
Tamiya
Hot Bodies/HPI
Losi
Corally
XRay
Kyosho
Yokomo
and more?!?!?!?
Don't these cars already sort of resemble one another (ok, except the Losi, but it does have 4 wheels, 2 belts, 2 diffs, dogbones, a motor plate, etc etc).
Point is, everyone already has a dialed in belt car. We don't. We NEED one...the problem is getting something on the market that WORKS, not just releasing something that looks different and sucks ass on the track. We're not a suck-ass-on-the-track company. So, yeah, it may resemble the top-notch cars but that's what works. And that will get us in the winners circle...well, HOPEFULLY that will get us in the winners circle!!!!
Now, for our NEXT TC we can do something different....something out of the ordinary and be ok....we'll have our 'winning' design already established.
When we did the TC3 and it's shaft drive configuration, everyone said it was a bad idea...like the Tenth Technology Predator. When it worked and started winning, everyone copied it, or made their versions of it. Shaft drive is proving NOT to be so superior and now that we are trying to get into the belt drive config, there are HOW MANY TC companies out there????? Let's see.
Tamiya
Hot Bodies/HPI
Losi
Corally
XRay
Kyosho
Yokomo
and more?!?!?!?
Don't these cars already sort of resemble one another (ok, except the Losi, but it does have 4 wheels, 2 belts, 2 diffs, dogbones, a motor plate, etc etc).
Point is, everyone already has a dialed in belt car. We don't. We NEED one...the problem is getting something on the market that WORKS, not just releasing something that looks different and sucks ass on the track. We're not a suck-ass-on-the-track company. So, yeah, it may resemble the top-notch cars but that's what works. And that will get us in the winners circle...well, HOPEFULLY that will get us in the winners circle!!!!
Now, for our NEXT TC we can do something different....something out of the ordinary and be ok....we'll have our 'winning' design already established.
#990
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by RCknight
make a TC great. The TC5 or whatever it is has the same old shocks and they are mounted the same.
Just my opinion, but why not be the first to make a purpose built lipo car? Use the Orion spec pack for a standard and Novak brushless.