Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit >

Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree321Likes

Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit

    Hide Wikipost
Old 11-05-2018, 09:06 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: 30Tooth
Picked up a TKI3 and want to upgrade to TKI4 ? Here are all the updated parts:

Shocks

IF347-155 1.5X5 Pistons
IF471-01 Front Shock Body
IF470-01 Rear Shock Body
IF470-03BK Shock Adjust Dial
IFW154 Boots
IF346-05C Shock End Set

Wing

IF491BK Wing
IFW460B Wing Mount/Stay

Rear End

IFH006W Wheel
IF490 HUB
IF490-01 Hub Insert
IF492 Shock Pin
IF423HB Rear Arm
IF287 Hard Upper Rod Rear

Front End

IF489 Steering Rod Set
IF488 Knuckles
IF487H Front Arm
IFW458 Hard Lower Pin
IFW425 93MM CVD
IF286 Hard Upper Rod
IF486 Lower Susp Holder
IFW459 Servo Saver (Hard)
IF446B Ackerman Arm
IF426-64.5 Susp Shaft


Other

IF469B Filter
97035LW-13 Clutch Bell
IF453B Body Mount
IFW107GM Hexes
W300910 Washer
IF443B Center Diff Plate
IF444C Tank
IF479B Radio Box
96772 13x16x0.15mm Shim
IF481B Fuel Tank Stay
IFW336GM Wheelnut
IFB008 TKI4 Body
IFD403W TKI4 Decal

---------------------------

Another option if you want TKI4 Durability but TKI3 geometry of the front arm is :

IF493 Front Arm (Updated MP9 front arms replaces IF427B as a direct fit. Left and right.)

They use the older TKI3 captured outer hinge pin and screw. But if you just reem out the the outer hole you can use TKI hinge-pin/nut (IFW458)
---------------------------

Optional Updates / New Parts:

IFW469 IFW469 Aeration Cap Set(Threaded Big Shock/MP9)

IFW473 New Brake Pads (Sept 2017)

Optional Alu front hubs:
- IFW412 - 13 deg (like stock plastic ones)
- IFW436 - 16 deg
- IFW474 - 17.5 deg
- IFW461 - 19deg

M2C 1mm engine spacer: M2C9610

Body Options
New Bitty Force Body

Tebo's Build Videos

Video #1

Video #2

Video #3

Video #4

Video #5

Video #6

Original Kyosho MP9 TKI Thread
_____________________

Baseline setups from Joonas.




_____________________

Shock build with vented cap and compensator.

You have to use the HC diaphragms (if346-09,stock TKI3 and if not mistaken TKI4 too, yes the thin ones no one likes), aeration caps without the bleeder screw or mod the stock caps by drilling a 1.5 or 2mm hole on the top facing up or at an angle (doesn't matter the size or angle, it just for bleeding pressure behind the diaphragm and allow the foam compensator to breathe) and a 10mm width x 3.5mm height dome shaped foam compensator made from old open cell inserts or dishwasher sponge. The foam compensator has to be soft enough not to add rebound but allow the diaphragm to regain it's shape.

Setup Sheet and Tuning

The setup sheet is getting crowded with all options but don't worry once you get acquainted with the parts will make sense.
Run the car as is, more than probably you won't need anything else. Using my setup as an example:

Diff gear has two options, normal and LSD. LSD stands for limited slip differential and is like using thick oils because you can't tune coast from locked.

Shock setup is a bit more confusing, you have two shock body sizes (S and M and truggy sized rear shocks that only the first version had so forget this one), three types of pistons (flat holes and surfaces, flat holes tapered surface and tapered holes with tapered surface): tapered have most pack, then black(simple piston) and then white because length of the holes. Then you have different length springs to account for different shock sizes, for a standard wheelbase/no weights car a good combo is Light Blue front and Orange rear, if you extend the wheelbase then I expect the included Light Blue rear springs be money instead of Orange.

Ride height is self explanatory, start always with lower arms parallel because good suspension geometry will be far easier to achieve. Rebound is used as total shock length no idea why they call it rebound, either use total shock length or maximum exposed shock shaft length. Camber self explanatory, run more camber in the front than the rear to make the car oversteer and more rear than front to make it understeer(grossly oversimplified).

Toe same deal as camber(again grossly oversimplified) but this you have to run the least amount you can. I use around 2º-2.5º on my cars, never more as I can find traction by other means with way less impact on performance.

Wheelbase is a powerful setting, changes a lot of stuff. Let's just say that it can make the car behave neutral or not in that small range. Try for yourself. I like to use the longest setting and tune from there.

Shock position self explanatory, something most don't change and I don't play around with it. I do have a method but involves much work (with the car bottomed out, see which position places the shock 90º to the lower arm and then chose spring from a couple equations and bam done, I can do it easily so anyone interested just ask.

Rear upper arm position is again an important setting, you change both camber gain and roll centre. The rear roll centre should be higher than the front, that's why I use the middle hole inner row as a starting setup.

Suspension arm, self explanatory: there are two different length arms and each has a hard and a normal flex plastic.

Front suspension bushing is for upper arm alignment, also same deal as rear upper arm position changes both camber gain and roll centre.

Suspension holder is for kick up (pro dive is the correct naming). I believe tki4 9º of kick up to be better than 9º of kick up using the tki3 parts because you can run the car lower (26mm front ride height) and use the +2mm front shock tower if there's too much camber gain or it's stiff in roll. So use +2mm lowered roll centre to keep most stuff unchanged or use the bushings with the dot up to lower the roll centre a bit more, doesn't hurt anything.

Front hub carrier, self explanatory. I am trying to use the out hole on top of the carrier as it is better during braking and accelerating. Together with the higher front roll centre on the tki4 should provide enough camber gain during cornering if not then more caster will do.

Rear roll centre and anti squat(wrongly called skid angle). Again same thinking as the front, lower the car and keep roll centre in the same height as before(that will need a change in upper arm position which my setup does). Anti squat is changed only if the pitching motion causes too much camber to be gained by the rear tires on power, nothing more.

Front knuckle, apparently there's a difference in the Ackerman arm. Can't say anything about them as I don't know enough about both.

Rear hub carrier,there is one made of plastic (which doesn't have offset apparently so it's suited to long arm setting) and three aluminium versions. One similar to the plastic one, other with offset and a new one with offset and adjustable hub height.

Rear tread can be used as arm length and outboard toe(never seen it being used but the possibility is there). Longer is better most of the time (only on really low traction).

Chassis brace, wheel hub, sway bars and weight are self explanatory. No need to use weights nor other hubs. A couple of roll bars would be a nice addition. About the aluminium braces I am torn, I guess the car doesn't need flex with this setup but won't recommend the stiffer braces but the lower engine mount is very nice to deal with flex around the clutch.

Wing and wing stay are like the d81x had regarding height and position. The wing should be as low and have free airflow as possible.

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2017, 03:38 PM
  #1501  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (360)
 
tobamiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tea drinking Limmey in NJ
Posts: 12,389
Trader Rating: 360 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by didrace
It seems kanai did not impressed with the tki4 changes
Every team driver goes back to tki3.

Do you guys have a different opinion?
As I understand it. The TKI4 is designed with high grip tracks in mind. Whereas the TKI3 was better suited to rougher tracks. So basically the tki3 parts are being used to make the car work better on a majority of rough tracks we see (main tki3 parts used are B-block, Knuckles, Front Arms).

One nice [ and I'm completely biased ] feature of kyosho cars is a new release is typically evolutionary rather than revolutionary - so you don't have to basically throw the old car away. Can just evolve it as you need to.
Motorman007 likes this.
tobamiester is offline  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:23 PM
  #1502  
Tech Fanatic
 
vandalzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere near Japan
Posts: 762
Default

Sooo
My 2nd race plus one practice run, impressions and thoughts:
- 20g weight in front of rear bulkhead made a noticeable difference in overall stability, car became more... lets say predictable.
- Seems that K cars are sensitive to tire choice, and i'd say not too agressive in eating thread. MY prev teknos definitely were thread-hungry.
- No broken arms this time=)
- Setup i'm running is basically box stock, 16deg hubs@15, 37.5/27.5 shock oil w/5x1.5, 101/118 (afair) droop and 26/28 rh. And thats pretty good setup for tight tech med to hi grip track w/lot of hairpins. Can't even imagine what try to tune next. Maybe thats the point where K cars are good at: you have nothing to tune in, instead focus on driving/practice.
vandalzzz is offline  
Old 05-02-2017, 08:37 AM
  #1503  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: My house.
Posts: 3,569
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Trying "new" stuff, inclined C-hub. Should make it easier to drive and more stable during braking and transitions while decreasing front tire wear. Part # IF6B for the 7.5 and IF221 for the NEO/ST-RR versions, don't ask what is the difference, IDK. Use the outer carrier hole for the upper arm, should provide the same camber as before without adjusting anything, also use the rear Ackerman plate hole as the steering arm is different. If you fancy spending more and remaining stealth use IFW332, they are CNC.
Attached Thumbnails Kyosho Inferno MP9 TKI4 1/8 Buggy Kit-img_20170502_141816.jpg  
30Tooth is offline  
Old 05-03-2017, 05:05 AM
  #1504  
Tech Apprentice
 
CFRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 81
Default

Hey 30tooth the setup you posted, it's a good start for low grip?. Does the rear hub goes in hi roll center position, why the long camber link. Thanks in advance
CFRacing is offline  
Old 05-03-2017, 04:14 PM
  #1505  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: My house.
Posts: 3,569
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Hola! That setup is intended to work anywhere and will be updated once in a while. The rear hub can be run in HRC or LRC but with the inner bushing in the HRC position, try each see which one you prefer. The long camber link is to numb the rear a little regarding throttle inputs, together with the HRC should make the rear tires wear less, or at least keep them in the best working temperature. Gracias!
30Tooth is offline  
Old 05-03-2017, 04:42 PM
  #1506  
Tech Apprentice
 
CFRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by 30Tooth
Hola! That setup is intended to work anywhere and will be updated once in a while. The rear hub can be run in HRC or LRC but with the inner bushing in the HRC position, try each see which one you prefer. The long camber link is to numb the rear a little regarding throttle inputs, together with the HRC should make the rear tires wear less, or at least keep them in the best working temperature. Gracias!
Thanks for the quick reply. Will test that.I already have the rear arm bushings in that position but not the longest camber link. Will keep you posted.
CFRacing is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 12:33 PM
  #1507  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (31)
 
offroad dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,075
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Do anyone know what KO servos Tebo uses in his buggy and truggy?
offroad dude is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 01:04 PM
  #1508  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (360)
 
tobamiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tea drinking Limmey in NJ
Posts: 12,389
Trader Rating: 360 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by offroad dude
Do anyone know what KO servos Tebo uses in his buggy and truggy?
Ko RSx2 in buggy. Under the Hood: Jared Tebo -NeoBuggy.net ? Offroad RC Car News

Likely same in Truck. http://www.neobuggy.net/2015/06/21/u...-jared-tebo-4/
tobamiester is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 01:09 PM
  #1509  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (31)
 
offroad dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,075
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Thanks!
offroad dude is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 09:41 AM
  #1510  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Elche, Spain
Posts: 78
Default

Hi guys,

please can some of you explain the differences (and best track condition-use) of these lower front arms?

KYOIF487
KYOIF483B
KYOIF487H
KYOIF493
jeancc is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 01:27 PM
  #1511  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,215
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

While you're at it, can someone explain how the new B block hinge pin holder affects the handling of the car if all other parts are as per a TKI3 please? Oh, and the new rear uprights also. Thanks guys.
aaron125 is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 02:13 PM
  #1512  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
ravage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Thinking about picking one of these up, I know they fixed the a arm problem any other problems people are having?
ravage is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 02:31 PM
  #1513  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (20)
 
Team_Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: IOWA
Posts: 598
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=ravage;14920016]Thinking about picking one of these up, I know they fixed the a arm problem any other problems people are having?[/QUOTE

Everytthing on the car is good. 1 little thing I recommend is the m2c motor spacers. The clutch bell will hit the chassis without these and could cause clutch bell bearing failure and worst case which I've never encountered is a broken crankshaft. There only like $5 but well worth it. You won't be disappointed with the tki4 awsome car.
Team_Orange is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 04:03 PM
  #1514  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
ravage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=Team_Orange;14920028]
Originally Posted by ravage
Thinking about picking one of these up, I know they fixed the a arm problem any other problems people are having?[/QUOTE

Everytthing on the car is good. 1 little thing I recommend is the m2c motor spacers. The clutch bell will hit the chassis without these and could cause clutch bell bearing failure and worst case which I've never encountered is a broken crankshaft. There only like $5 but well worth it. You won't be disappointed with the tki4 awsome car.
Ok sweet i think I'm going to go with it. Is this what you are talking about? https://www.amainhobbies.com/m2c-rac...2c9610/p267815
ravage is offline  
Old 05-06-2017, 07:15 PM
  #1515  
Tech Fanatic
 
coneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 805
Default

Originally Posted by Team_Orange
The clutch bell will hit the chassis without these and could cause clutch bell bearing failure and worst case which I've never encountered is a broken crankshaft. There only like $5 but well worth it. You won't be disappointed with the tki4 awsome car.
personally i've never had a problem with the clutch bell hitting the chassis. yeah sure it hits but it's never been a problem. i.e flameouts, bearings.
coneman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.