New Team CRC Gen-XL
#738
Tech Elite
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 5280 Raceway. Denver's finest RC facility
Posts: 4,780
Obi-Wynn-Ka-Nobi can teach you the ways of the force.
Look at Bodine, he used to take his camber guage to bed, now it is trophy girls. (Sorry Mrs Bodine)
There are going to be alot of Team CRC cars at Timezone, I think that I will yelling at people alot (mainly because Ficco will be there).
If Bodine has turned into a CRC Jedi, then Ficco has turned into....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPPj6viIBmU
Look at Bodine, he used to take his camber guage to bed, now it is trophy girls. (Sorry Mrs Bodine)
There are going to be alot of Team CRC cars at Timezone, I think that I will yelling at people alot (mainly because Ficco will be there).
If Bodine has turned into a CRC Jedi, then Ficco has turned into....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPPj6viIBmU
#740
#741
Tech Apprentice
http://www.teamcrc.com/crc/modules.p...ewtopic&t=2034
#743
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
Some were asking about using the new long upper arm vs the older long pillow ball. They are the same geometry, but the long upper arm is more durable and versatile. The long pillow ball could bend. In order to mount up the long upper arm in "long" setting, you need 4 x 3/16" button heads to mount the castor blocks into the c/f and then you need 4 x 4/40 lock nuts to secure the c/f to the lower arms. You will need to dremmel just slightly the very back side of the castor blocks where the steering turnbuckles come up against them to get enough steering throw.
Again, the braces should only be used for high grip and or fast corner entry.
#744
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
The Bomb-R was designed to conform to the EFRA body rules. EFRA layed out a set of dimensions, and if you max them out, you get the Bomb-R or the AMR or the Parma EEE (I think that is what it is called). They all kind of look the same, and basically handle the same. Alot of rear downforce, good for 10.5 or faster. I have tested it in "spec" classes and it is not bad, I just like the quicker transition of the R8C better. Now with the "spec" classes getting faster, alot of people have gone to this type of body due to the added stability. Some mod guys still run the R8C with a little more forward rake than the "spec" guys would. It is all personal preference I guess.
The R10 is the open cockpit body made by Black Art. I have always loved open cockpit bodies because they look more realistic. It meets the rules for some of the European sactioning bodies (not sure which ones). It handles alot like the R8C. I tested it quite a bit a couple of years ago but never had the guts to pull the trigger and run it at a big race. You know how we RC racers are, sometimes it is hard to get us to change things.
Hope this helps....
dumper
#745
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
Brian
#746
Team EAM
iTrader: (79)
The Audi R8C has basically become the standard for "spec" type racing. In classes 13.5 and slower this body changes direction very quickly and also provides enough rear downforce at those speeds. It has a ton of steering without losing the rear of the car. We run it with just a little forward rake (front lower than the rear)
The Bomb-R was designed to conform to the EFRA body rules. EFRA layed out a set of dimensions, and if you max them out, you get the Bomb-R or the AMR or the Parma EEE (I think that is what it is called). They all kind of look the same, and basically handle the same. Alot of rear downforce, good for 10.5 or faster. I have tested it in "spec" classes and it is not bad, I just like the quicker transition of the R8C better. Now with the "spec" classes getting faster, alot of people have gone to this type of body due to the added stability. Some mod guys still run the R8C with a little more forward rake than the "spec" guys would. It is all personal preference I guess.
The R10 is the open cockpit body made by Black Art. I have always loved open cockpit bodies because they look more realistic. It meets the rules for some of the European sactioning bodies (not sure which ones). It handles alot like the R8C. I tested it quite a bit a couple of years ago but never had the guts to pull the trigger and run it at a big race. You know how we RC racers are, sometimes it is hard to get us to change things.
Hope this helps....
dumper
The Bomb-R was designed to conform to the EFRA body rules. EFRA layed out a set of dimensions, and if you max them out, you get the Bomb-R or the AMR or the Parma EEE (I think that is what it is called). They all kind of look the same, and basically handle the same. Alot of rear downforce, good for 10.5 or faster. I have tested it in "spec" classes and it is not bad, I just like the quicker transition of the R8C better. Now with the "spec" classes getting faster, alot of people have gone to this type of body due to the added stability. Some mod guys still run the R8C with a little more forward rake than the "spec" guys would. It is all personal preference I guess.
The R10 is the open cockpit body made by Black Art. I have always loved open cockpit bodies because they look more realistic. It meets the rules for some of the European sactioning bodies (not sure which ones). It handles alot like the R8C. I tested it quite a bit a couple of years ago but never had the guts to pull the trigger and run it at a big race. You know how we RC racers are, sometimes it is hard to get us to change things.
Hope this helps....
dumper
EA
#750
if you are like me and tend to test the durability of components, then a thrust bearing makes sense, it is definitely a more crashworthy arrangement.
but if you drive clean and fast and are after maximum performance, then the IRS style diff can(will) be the most free(diff action) arrangement.
the reason for this:
1 pro: the thrust bearing will stay smooth after hard side impacts compared to the flanged bearing that otherwise must take the thrust loads.
2 con: the thrust bearing and the outer flanged bearing both need to rotate during diff action. so that when you add the thrust bearing you increase the drag of the diff action (2 bearings compared to one)
i don't see how adding a thrust bearing will improve performance, but it could help maintain performance?