Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC5 >

Team Associated TC5

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Associated TC5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2006, 09:29 AM
  #301  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
RCknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,294
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default I'm talking about a different upper deck flex design.

Originally Posted by ZER01
It also had an adjustable shock-like mount on the top deck by the rear bulkhead. I clearly remeber that kit as 20 minutes into building it I broke a diff-bolt tightening up a diff-lol.
Yea...getting upper deck flex has been around for years. It's how Xray accomplished it. A much better way if you ask me. It's nice to have one car for most conditions. Not to mention Xray put some time into how their parts look. One thing owners like about HD, they make each part look good. I just don't know if I could go back to anything else. After all the denials from AE?
RCknight is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 11:49 AM
  #302  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado, Above The Rest
Posts: 992
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
Key word there being pending. This could mean they have begun the patent process (long, painful, expensive). Or they may never have done it and are just hoping that claiming the patent is pending that others will shy away from the technology that they claim to have discovered.

Yok YR4's were the bomb back in the day
That is illegal according to United States Patent Law. Making a false claim like that is a dangerous gamble.
THE DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:01 PM
  #303  
Tech Master
 
TRF415boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by THE DARKSIDE
That is illegal according to United States Patent Law. Making a false claim like that is a dangerous gamble.
There is a one year delay between the time you deposit the patent and the time it becomes effective. This time is for the patent agency to do research into previous patents and designs, including in all the countries for which the patent has been deposited, to make sure the patent doesn't infringe other existing patents, or that it is not taken from one that has fallen into common knowledge for example.

In the meantime the company that has deposited the patent is allowed to use the term "patent pending". It only means the patent process has been started but the patent itself not yet approved (and it might not get approved even). In the case of X-Ray, I believe it is the European Patent Agency where the patent was deposited.
TRF415boy is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:19 PM
  #304  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
jag88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,157
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

You will find people on this and other sites who will argue until they are blue in the face that our toy cars are scaled down versions of full size cars and that the laws of physics apply to both yet you don't hear of F1, Nascar,IRL or any other group of racers/manufacturers designing flex into their chassis to improve handling. Interesting ........ no ?
jag88 is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:31 PM
  #305  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,659
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

I think a big reason for that is the fact that the scaled down forces our cars place on our suspensions is probably greater than any full size race car. Not even an F1 car could corner as fast, change direction, or accelerate as fast in full scale. So to absorb some of the forces that apply, we use some chassis flex to help the suspension.
Jon Kerr is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:31 PM
  #306  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 165
Default

Maxxcrazy is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:36 PM
  #307  
Tech Master
 
pheyhoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,337
Default

Looks like all 4 arms fit each corner....
pheyhoe is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:37 PM
  #308  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,659
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

There are a lot of aspects of setup and such that don't translate completely from full size race cars to our 1/10 scale cars. Largely because of the differences in things like speed and power to weight ratios, etc...
Jon Kerr is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:55 PM
  #309  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Patriiick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Switzerland.
Posts: 601
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Tire patch size and overall mass/power/speed ratio are the most significant... it s totally exponential over "real" cars
Patriiick is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:58 PM
  #310  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (95)
 
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 4,828
Trader Rating: 95 (100%+)
Default

I still would like to see when we might find it's way to production? Any estimates? Fall, next spring, next year? further out?

Any hints?
dr_hfuhuhurr is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 01:00 PM
  #311  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Patriiick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Switzerland.
Posts: 601
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TRF415boy
There is a one year delay between the time you deposit the patent and the time it becomes effective. This time is for the patent agency to do research into previous patents and designs, including in all the countries for which the patent has been deposited, to make sure the patent doesn't infringe other existing patents, or that it is not taken from one that has fallen into common knowledge for example.

In the meantime the company that has deposited the patent is allowed to use the term "patent pending". It only means the patent process has been started but the patent itself not yet approved (and it might not get approved even). In the case of X-Ray, I believe it is the European Patent Agency where the patent was deposited.
not so true.
Patents can be localized, regional or worldwide.. but this has a cost.
Furthermore, for a patent to be valid you need 3 conditions:

- Newness: Meaning that the patent must cover a new area and prove that the system was not introduced before at any point

- Publicity: if you apply for a patent AFTER that you project has been public, you patent will be legal but will not hold ground if you fo to court.
This means that you must apply for the patent before ANYTHING about the project is made public

- Finally, geography. You must PAY for your patent in order for it to be properly covered in every zone, and this can usually be quite expensive.

So, "patent pending" sure does mean that patents are indeed being registered, but it does not meant that the said patent can be upholded everywhere, or that it is actually valid.
Patriiick is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 01:19 PM
  #312  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,659
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
I still would like to see when we might find it's way to production? Any estimates? Fall, next spring, next year? further out?

Any hints?
The car I was allowed to take a look at looked nowhere near production. I doubt it'll be ready for production until long after the worlds. Reedy was it's first race if I'm not mistaken.
Jon Kerr is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 04:18 PM
  #313  
Tech Fanatic
 
Kevin Boyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 997
Default

Keep the photos coming, nice to see the car is there in full force.

Later
Kevin Boyle
Kevin Boyle is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 06:36 PM
  #314  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
RCknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,294
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default Is the belt offset?

I can't tell. Are we looking a a single belt design like the XXX-S? The arms look strong. This hobby could use a stronger car for both the new racer and avid club racer. I sure wish I could have some imput into each design feature.
RCknight is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 06:49 PM
  #315  
Tech Elite
 
POOKYT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,584
Default

Originally Posted by RCknight
I can't tell. Are we looking a a single belt design like the XXX-S? The arms look strong. This hobby could use a stronger car for both the new racer and avid club racer. I sure wish I could have some imput into each design feature.

Single belt......Paleeeezzzzze!!!! LOL I do believe from the Reedy pics of the car at the side shot it looks to be a dual belt set-up. Sorry man.

Brant
POOKYT is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.