Bradd Vercoe quits as AARCMCC EP section head
11-13-2013, 08:15 PM
#31
It is my belief that EP ONR needs 3 people at the moment, especially as it administers 2 different scales of racing, that in some other bodies around the world are dealt with by different sections. I digress.
18.1 Each Section;
(a) will elect at least one, to a maximum 3, associate member(s) from affiliated members at their respective sections' annual general meeting under clause 19, to represent and manage the affairs of the respective section
(b) may appoint or elect State delegates at the direction of the officers of each section. These delegates will only participate within the section they are appointed.
18.2 The Section officers may be elected as follows, dependant on the needs of the individual section;
(a) section head
(b) up to two representatives, including section secretary
(a) will elect at least one, to a maximum 3, associate member(s) from affiliated members at their respective sections' annual general meeting under clause 19, to represent and manage the affairs of the respective section
(b) may appoint or elect State delegates at the direction of the officers of each section. These delegates will only participate within the section they are appointed.
18.2 The Section officers may be elected as follows, dependant on the needs of the individual section;
(a) section head
(b) up to two representatives, including section secretary
11-13-2013, 09:26 PM
#33
Tech Fanatic
LOL every time AARCMCC feel threatened they use legal action as a scare tactic, I find it rather amusing lol. Or in my case, I was told I couldn't race Aarcmcc events, when I questioned the transponder debacle.
So let me get this straight? Because you went to the ATO audit office, to "check" the credentials of AARCMCC you were threatened with legal action from Aarcmcc? So in retrospect they have something to hide?
Nathan
So let me get this straight? Because you went to the ATO audit office, to "check" the credentials of AARCMCC you were threatened with legal action from Aarcmcc? So in retrospect they have something to hide?
Nathan
No, I told them unless I received the relevant financial information I would use whatever means necessary to acquire It, without being specific. Micheal Turner told me in the letter on Monday if after signing away the clubs rights, if I took financials to any third party they would take steps to legally restrain us and then would pursue us for damages, basically stated. However at the time I had no financials. I contacted the ATO after the letter of demand, I asked for an immediate response and got it around a couple of weeks later from AARCMCC.
I acted before signing anything about a week ago. I have also been threatened more then once with legal action directly and indirectly through others by them. To be fair I have given as much as I have got.
I am sure AARCMCC will weather a tax audit with no problems, they also have Audit Insurance to cover the cost of Accountants fees.
AARCMCC however lack a Not for Profit Status, this could be problematic.
What was the transponder debacle?
Regards Graham
Last edited by graham1234; 11-13-2013 at 10:30 PM.
11-14-2013, 01:42 PM
#34
Such a shame to have it come to this, but glad he has done all the work to keep it together. Good work Bradd.
Coxy.
Coxy.
11-14-2013, 03:29 PM
#36
I'd like to thank Bradd for all the work he has done while at AARCMCC.
Regards,
Vince.
Regards,
Vince.
Last edited by nexxus; 11-14-2013 at 07:03 PM. Reason: Language / Abusive remarks removed (doesn't help anything)
11-14-2013, 03:33 PM
#37
Can everyone see why I was pissed off about this whole AARCMCC thing a while back on the AARCMCC thread. It's just pathetic the way Mr Davis and his little bitches handled the lead up to the Nats. Adelaide now has enough entries to run a small club meet!
Davis and his men blocked Bradd Vercoe from having anymore to do with the nats because he was against what Davis was planning...
After the shit hit the fan and the entry list to the nats became disgraceful Mr Turner blames Bradd Vercoe for not fixing the problem...
I'd like to thank Bradd for all the work he has done while at AARCMCC.
Ps, if I have offended any of the AARCMCC committee by calling you bitches, then take off your blouse and pull your head out of Mr Davis' ass!
Regards,
Sto Kuts .
Davis and his men blocked Bradd Vercoe from having anymore to do with the nats because he was against what Davis was planning...
After the shit hit the fan and the entry list to the nats became disgraceful Mr Turner blames Bradd Vercoe for not fixing the problem...
I'd like to thank Bradd for all the work he has done while at AARCMCC.
Ps, if I have offended any of the AARCMCC committee by calling you bitches, then take off your blouse and pull your head out of Mr Davis' ass!
Regards,
Sto Kuts .
Last edited by A Ilievski; 11-14-2013 at 10:10 PM.
11-14-2013, 07:05 PM
#38
Hi All
I apreciate the support guys, but be careful about the sledging.
I hope that some discussion of the issues can lead to improvements for the future. AARCMCC as of itself as a governing structure is not at fault, merely the operation of the structure.
I would hope that the next person to take on the role gets the required autonomy to act as required.
My only hope in the current scenario is that Michael Turner acts in the best interests of AARCMCC and reigns in Brad Davis instead of spectating him run gunshot. So in your court Michael.
I apreciate the support guys, but be careful about the sledging.
I hope that some discussion of the issues can lead to improvements for the future. AARCMCC as of itself as a governing structure is not at fault, merely the operation of the structure.
I would hope that the next person to take on the role gets the required autonomy to act as required.
My only hope in the current scenario is that Michael Turner acts in the best interests of AARCMCC and reigns in Brad Davis instead of spectating him run gunshot. So in your court Michael.
11-15-2013, 01:07 AM
#40
Tech Regular
what a sad state of affairs. i hope this sqabbling gets sorted out soon. can we look after us. the racers.
11-15-2013, 01:29 AM
#41
I think that's the whole idea, a representative of the racers to put forward suggestions for change and move the sport forward as a whole. By the sounds of things, the opposite of what's been occurring in recent times.
11-16-2013, 11:22 PM
#43
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Landsborough, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,142
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Kindest regards,
Lars.
11-17-2013, 02:27 AM
#44
I make the following statements without taking sides at all.
I've seen some posts in recent months where people have said they aren't happy with Brad Davis. A couple of those have come from people in IC ONR clubs and with some experience in RC administration. Yet, no one thought it worthwhile to nominate to run against Brad at the AGM held last month. I find that astounding.
There were two nominations for the vacant EP OFR Secretary position at Easter, and two for President. We had votes for both positions. Just saying.
I've seen some posts in recent months where people have said they aren't happy with Brad Davis. A couple of those have come from people in IC ONR clubs and with some experience in RC administration. Yet, no one thought it worthwhile to nominate to run against Brad at the AGM held last month. I find that astounding.
There were two nominations for the vacant EP OFR Secretary position at Easter, and two for President. We had votes for both positions. Just saying.
11-17-2013, 02:33 AM
#45
I make the following statements without taking sides at all.
I've seen some posts in recent months where people have said they aren't happy with Brad Davis. A couple of those have come from people in IC ONR clubs and with some experience in RC administration. Yet, no one thought it worthwhile to nominate to run against Brad at the AGM held last month. I find that astounding.
There were two nominations for the vacant EP OFR Secretary position at Easter, and two for President. We had votes for both positions. Just saying.
I've seen some posts in recent months where people have said they aren't happy with Brad Davis. A couple of those have come from people in IC ONR clubs and with some experience in RC administration. Yet, no one thought it worthwhile to nominate to run against Brad at the AGM held last month. I find that astounding.
There were two nominations for the vacant EP OFR Secretary position at Easter, and two for President. We had votes for both positions. Just saying.
I have been doing my best to no post on this thread, but finally someone has said something that I have been wanting to say a number of times.
"If you do not like how things are run, Man up and nominate for the job"
It is all really that simple, NOMINATE, get on here and tell us all why you would make such an excellent rep, get proxy votes from clubs not attending and go for the win.
SIMPLES.