Team Losi JRXS
01-08-2006, 05:09 AM
#9977
Originally Posted by Rob Phillips
Stan, what do you think of the car?
01-08-2006, 06:29 AM
#9979
Originally Posted by Mdoc
pssst....pooky......he saw the light 
LOL I guess so!
At 2:40 he loves the car and then at 5:41 Its gotta go Now!!!!
Brant
01-08-2006, 07:33 AM
#9980
New proto???
I'm surfing on RC50.com for Novak's photo. Something new catch my eye...
http://www.rc50.com/modules.php?name...422&fullsize=1
It apears to be similar with rear motor proto, but the servo is moved away from centerline, to free space for battery/motor to be moved forward. Quite interesting design as I think it probably be more balanced than rear motor proto.
The photo resized and attached, from RC50.com
http://www.rc50.com/modules.php?name...422&fullsize=1
It apears to be similar with rear motor proto, but the servo is moved away from centerline, to free space for battery/motor to be moved forward. Quite interesting design as I think it probably be more balanced than rear motor proto.
The photo resized and attached, from RC50.com
01-08-2006, 07:47 AM
#9981
Originally Posted by dawgmeat
Went to www.speedzonerc.com I tied for fastest lap in 19-turn, qualified second, but a lot of the big dawgs didn't show up, anyway kept breaking foams tire in the first, third qaulifers and the main so that kept me back. heading to Rcmadness to rumble with heavy hitters, oh ya very underrated car
Hey dawgmeat,
Does Speedzone have parts for the JRXS? I might take a run up there in the next few weeks.
Thanks!
01-08-2006, 07:52 AM
#9982
Tech Adept
I like the way the motor mounts.
01-08-2006, 12:37 PM
#9983
Originally Posted by ttso
I'm surfing on RC50.com for Novak's photo. Something new catch my eye...
http://www.rc50.com/modules.php?name...422&fullsize=1
It apears to be similar with rear motor proto, but the servo is moved away from centerline, to free space for battery/motor to be moved forward. Quite interesting design as I think it probably be more balanced than rear motor proto.
The photo resized and attached, from RC50.com
http://www.rc50.com/modules.php?name...422&fullsize=1
It apears to be similar with rear motor proto, but the servo is moved away from centerline, to free space for battery/motor to be moved forward. Quite interesting design as I think it probably be more balanced than rear motor proto.
The photo resized and attached, from RC50.com
EWWWW!!!!!
I thought the weird servo placement was gone after the Streetweapon!
Unless, this is the start of the Nitro development.... Think about it, the new rear motor placement, yeah it works in electric, but it's freed up alot of room for Nitro equipment!
01-08-2006, 02:53 PM
#9984
Originally Posted by JRXS_chris
EWWWW!!!!!
I thought the weird servo placement was gone after the Streetweapon!
Unless, this is the start of the Nitro development.... Think about it, the new rear motor placement, yeah it works in electric, but it's freed up alot of room for Nitro equipment!
I thought the weird servo placement was gone after the Streetweapon!
Unless, this is the start of the Nitro development.... Think about it, the new rear motor placement, yeah it works in electric, but it's freed up alot of room for Nitro equipment!
But it would make sense.
I just want my rear motor JRXS !!!!!!
Brant
01-08-2006, 03:46 PM
#9985
I have heard that the new proto has been working well in testing, from the pics it looks like both the motor and batteries have been moved forward. The origional rear motor car lifted the rear end up a lot under braking, bascially using all the droop you had. With the motor forward a little more I dont think it will do that anymore.
01-08-2006, 03:50 PM
#9986
the new servo seems to defeat the Low center of gravity stuff?
01-08-2006, 04:15 PM
#9988
Originally Posted by Randy Caster
I have heard that the new proto has been working well in testing, from the pics it looks like both the motor and batteries have been moved forward. The origional rear motor car lifted the rear end up a lot under braking, bascially using all the droop you had. With the motor forward a little more I dont think it will do that anymore.
Would the new motor position be about where it was on the XXX-S?
01-08-2006, 09:28 PM
#9989
Originally Posted by JRX-S Bill
Hi Randy,
Would the new motor position be about where it was on the XXX-S?
Would the new motor position be about where it was on the XXX-S?
01-09-2006, 07:46 AM
#9990
Novak
Well,, it was one heck of a race.
traction was super high from day one and it made for a LOT of work.
Easton and Francis's cars were pretty good... AG also was in the show.. EA had a good car and nearly put it in the show... Ray Huang and Kelly Bean put their cars in the brushess show.. My car... well.. it was a work in progress and in the 3rd round was "on pace" but then i decided to let every one else have a chance
by tapping here.. and then there in the last minute. Rockin the C-main... lead for 2 or 3 min.. and then broke my car.
I learned a bit about the car though. I have some pretty cool ideas that I will be trying out in the next few weeks.
big hand to Jim Hermann and Jeff Dayger
KB
traction was super high from day one and it made for a LOT of work.
Easton and Francis's cars were pretty good... AG also was in the show.. EA had a good car and nearly put it in the show... Ray Huang and Kelly Bean put their cars in the brushess show.. My car... well.. it was a work in progress and in the 3rd round was "on pace" but then i decided to let every one else have a chance
by tapping here.. and then there in the last minute. Rockin the C-main... lead for 2 or 3 min.. and then broke my car. I learned a bit about the car though. I have some pretty cool ideas that I will be trying out in the next few weeks.
big hand to Jim Hermann and Jeff Dayger
KB