Team Magic G4
12-29-2005, 10:32 AM
#211
Tech Fanatic
Originally Posted by Motorman
Alan are you referring to me? come out with it.
It had more to do with the company you mention than you will ever know. I know why they moved on and 90% of it was not the car! You my friend don't know jack. And I'm not going to discuss it here. FYI the entire race team left!!!!!!!!!. I promise you it had nothing to do with me. You feeling me !
This move by me and TM had more to do with the company you mention than you will ever know. They are nice people but after 5 years of promoting their company free gratis I feel I paid my dues. And I'm not talking going to one or two tracks in california and racing their car on a 50% ride. I'm talking about promoting it all over the country at my expense, (lets get this straight at my expense) And as for support level 90% of the people supporting them could not even get an email returned. You feeling me here!
It had more to do with the company you mention than you will ever know. I know why they moved on and 90% of it was not the car! You my friend don't know jack. And I'm not going to discuss it here. FYI the entire race team left!!!!!!!!!. I promise you it had nothing to do with me. You feeling me !
This move by me and TM had more to do with the company you mention than you will ever know. They are nice people but after 5 years of promoting their company free gratis I feel I paid my dues. And I'm not talking going to one or two tracks in california and racing their car on a 50% ride. I'm talking about promoting it all over the country at my expense, (lets get this straight at my expense) And as for support level 90% of the people supporting them could not even get an email returned. You feeling me here!
RC_Alan
12-29-2005, 10:36 AM
#212
Tech Fanatic
It would be very nice that if someone has a question, even if it's posted a few pages back to answer it or point that person in the right direction... .02
If the input and replies are positive, this will only help and not hurt the thread.
RC_Alan
If the input and replies are positive, this will only help and not hurt the thread.
RC_Alan
12-29-2005, 10:48 AM
#215
Tech Adept
Originally Posted by Dreddlox
Is that a yes or a no? 
12-29-2005, 11:12 AM
#216
Tech Adept
Originally Posted by Uneke
The overall CG of the car is so low that raising the light AAA pack a little still makes it lower than most cars. the rx is set lower than before so its possible that they cancel out. Don't know for sure, but i'm guessing.
The roll center IS adjustable.
The suspension geometry is just fine thank you very much. How are you comparing the two anyway. If a car handles it just handles. Just ask the 1/12th scale guys who are going back to a suspension design that was developed in the early 80's.
The roll center IS adjustable.
The suspension geometry is just fine thank you very much. How are you comparing the two anyway. If a car handles it just handles. Just ask the 1/12th scale guys who are going back to a suspension design that was developed in the early 80's.
12-29-2005, 01:15 PM
#219
Originally Posted by Motorman
I would agree it looks dated as it has not changed, neither has a NTC3 but big bad barry seems to be able to TQ with the dated suspension on that car still today. Point is if it works good why jack with it.
12-29-2005, 01:59 PM
#220
Originally Posted by rcrossco_1
Well you have clearly not even bothered to read as little as this page, as the answer was discussed.
.
12-29-2005, 02:01 PM
#221
Uneke
also the cg of the battery pack did not change as it was bolted to the bottom of the top deck before so the cg of the battery pack stayed in the same place. Its rotational center changed some and by moving it forward and to the side it added a little front weight and balanced the side weight. In fact moving the weight outboard actually helps the car some as the CG is so low on the car the outboard weight helps it roll more on a right turn. I always remember feeling an right left imbalance in the car before. I'm hoping the battery move improves this. I guess I'll know pretty soon. Those who have used Lemans top decks as some of you have already what did you think??
also the cg of the battery pack did not change as it was bolted to the bottom of the top deck before so the cg of the battery pack stayed in the same place. Its rotational center changed some and by moving it forward and to the side it added a little front weight and balanced the side weight. In fact moving the weight outboard actually helps the car some as the CG is so low on the car the outboard weight helps it roll more on a right turn. I always remember feeling an right left imbalance in the car before. I'm hoping the battery move improves this. I guess I'll know pretty soon. Those who have used Lemans top decks as some of you have already what did you think??
Last edited by Motorman; 12-29-2005 at 03:51 PM.
No I think the post just came out that way. I don't think he meant you. I look forward to seeing you again.
12-29-2005, 03:49 PM
#224
Originally Posted by Francis M.
whats that about? was that post intended for me?Thanks for the answer Denis, I'm glad to see your involved with TM directly
and it seems to be showing already. Can't wait to see one at rev.
LOL
No not you, quoting a line from "Taps"
12-29-2005, 03:52 PM
#225
On another note: we have requested a part number for a crash kit with essential plastic in it.
Francis: the other good part is that we will have K Factory for all cars not just G4. Including 777,MBX5,V1R/S-RRR,MTX3/4,NTC3,B4T4,REVO,FW05
Francis: the other good part is that we will have K Factory for all cars not just G4. Including 777,MBX5,V1R/S-RRR,MTX3/4,NTC3,B4T4,REVO,FW05