Body Tuck Ethics and The Modern Racer
#17
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
No mercy for the one run jokers?
I dunno, honestly, it depends on the circumstance. If it's just an incidental tap and they tuck, too bad. If it's a legit tap, I'd wait on 'em most likely.
How often do you know for sure if the guy in front of you has a LW body? I'd think you might not be sure unless it's someone you're pitting with, or friends with.
I dunno, honestly, it depends on the circumstance. If it's just an incidental tap and they tuck, too bad. If it's a legit tap, I'd wait on 'em most likely.
How often do you know for sure if the guy in front of you has a LW body? I'd think you might not be sure unless it's someone you're pitting with, or friends with.
#19
Tech Master
Snowy.
#21
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
...I had an idea on this issue and wonder if instead of using a 'min thickness' use a 'min weight' instead.
If the advantage of the lighter body is due to weight - than a 'min weight' ruling on body weight might be easier to police (Scale vs. Mic Readings)
Guys already run paint as thin as possible to lighten up the bodies in a lot of cases...
Would this address the issue? Or is there something more Aero or something for the advantage of a lighter body?
If the advantage of the lighter body is due to weight - than a 'min weight' ruling on body weight might be easier to police (Scale vs. Mic Readings)
Guys already run paint as thin as possible to lighten up the bodies in a lot of cases...
Would this address the issue? Or is there something more Aero or something for the advantage of a lighter body?
#23
...I had an idea on this issue and wonder if instead of using a 'min thickness' use a 'min weight' instead.
If the advantage of the lighter body is due to weight - than a 'min weight' ruling on body weight might be easier to police (Scale vs. Mic Readings)
Guys already run paint as thin as possible to lighten up the bodies in a lot of cases...
Would this address the issue? Or is there something more Aero or something for the advantage of a lighter body?
If the advantage of the lighter body is due to weight - than a 'min weight' ruling on body weight might be easier to police (Scale vs. Mic Readings)
Guys already run paint as thin as possible to lighten up the bodies in a lot of cases...
Would this address the issue? Or is there something more Aero or something for the advantage of a lighter body?
#24
YOUR fault you've touched him so you WAIT no matter what shell he's using. What is wrong with you people?
#25
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
...
ShoeGoo - Extra Paint - what ever made it make weight - if WEIGHT is the issue for wanting these light bodies...
(I'm a wall banger - I'd rather have .060 bodies - but I'm not a guy winning World/National championships...and I have to PAY for my bodies)
I see a run on ShooGoo purchases..
(I'm a wall banger - I'd rather have .060 bodies - but I'm not a guy winning World/National championships...and I have to PAY for my bodies)
#26
If I just touched the car and the body tucked, I would keep on going.
If I took the car out, then I would stop and let the person get back in front of me.
They really do need to institute a body thickness rule. Safety would be my main concern.
Safety - We don't need marshalls to fix tucked bodies. We only need marshalls to fix stuck, flipped or out of bounds cars or pull cars from the track if broken. The more you have a marshall going on the track there is more risk in something bad happening.
Also, if the bodies become so thin that you can't even handle them, a marshall has more of chance of hurting themselves due to motor and battery heat, as well as, any other protruding objects that could cause harm when handling a car with a flimsy body. Not only that, but also there is a higher chance the marshall actually tears the body when marshalling the car.
If I took the car out, then I would stop and let the person get back in front of me.
They really do need to institute a body thickness rule. Safety would be my main concern.
Safety - We don't need marshalls to fix tucked bodies. We only need marshalls to fix stuck, flipped or out of bounds cars or pull cars from the track if broken. The more you have a marshall going on the track there is more risk in something bad happening.
Also, if the bodies become so thin that you can't even handle them, a marshall has more of chance of hurting themselves due to motor and battery heat, as well as, any other protruding objects that could cause harm when handling a car with a flimsy body. Not only that, but also there is a higher chance the marshall actually tears the body when marshalling the car.
#28
It's like the foam tire debate. Because the sponsored racers get them for free they don't care if they tear through a body in a day. Just paint up another one for the next day.
#29
LW bodies are bad for the entire RC Racing community. Be done with them. If everybody is running a .030 there is no advantage and less problems with tucks and what not.
I have a LW body from one manufacturer that is only .008 on the sides and it is supposed to be an .020 body. It is like tissue paper. RIDICULOUS. Be done with the ultra LW bodies and bring back some better racing.
Do you really think a thread like this would of started if we did not have the ULTRA LW bodies? NOPE.
It's not a big deal to make the change and it is going to make for better racing. "Some" of the manufacturer's just need to get onboard and see the light. Win at all costs is not a good attitude.
Take a look at the photo with a rear shock tower hanging off of the back of the car prevent tucking. Remove weight from the body and turn around and hang it off the back of your car.
Last edited by RBLove; 02-05-2008 at 02:21 PM.
#30
Tech Champion
iTrader: (103)
If the guy is normally faster than me, I'll keep going. He's going to catch me anyway. If the guy is normally slower than me, I'll keep going. He didn't stand a chance to begin with. Seriously though. I would stop. I'd rather leave the race not worrying about who I cheated out of a win (opinions vary) instead of a 5 cent blue ribbon. It's still just a hobby.