I did a little testing on the mod JL today..... all i can say is this engine is ballistic !!!!

here is a quick video of todays testing.... In this video we are tuning in 3 different pipes... however it gives you an idea of what the engine is like.... so far I like the JP1 the best

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTWsW-g18vo

Nice job Neal I never got around to shooting a video yesterday, but I'll aim for this afternoon! The JP1, and the AE2035 are the number 1 contenders IMO . They seem to perform and sound the same on this mill, it'll come down to mileage between these two.

I went out and filmed this this afternoon:

Clocked JL .21 AE2035 pipe

Nice videos Johnny and Neal. I may have some video Sunday of a offroad practice session. I am gonna test my RB 2045/192 and see how it stacks up to the JP-4 in my truggy.

Look like the 2035 is the winning ticket.IMHO.

myself I think the JP-1 is better..similar bottom and way more top end.....

If I go with the videos, I can hear the engine brething with the 2035, eng.sounds higher in the RPM's. Jp-1 is made for engine with weak bottom end. And again this is what I get from the videos. that doesn't mean that the 2035 will work in every track I bet it won't.

It's going to be a tough call on what will be a better track pipe between those two ( AE2035/JP-1 ). The AE pipe feels great for sure and doesn't lack any power, but that JP-1 sure gets up in the RPMs! I'm excited to see what you'll think when you try the 2035 Neal since you now know how the JP-1 feels on this mill.

I just put two more tanks( number 12 ) through it at the carwash and Terry had his RC8T RTR. His .28 feels boggy compared to this JL, but I haven't put a race tune on his mill yet, and he's running stock electronics, so it's not a fair comparison. Still, the difference is drastic. This JL puts a smile on my face

Remember my video is showing the testing of 3 different pipes...... the JP-1 was only in the video briefly, the rest of the video was JP-2 and JP-4..... Maybe my ears are deceiving me but to me the JP-1 sounds like it has about 5000 more RPM on top end, the pitch in the exhaust note is much much higher....The higher they rev, the higher pitched the exhaust note becomes...

JP-4 initial startup to :46, the JP-1 was run from :46 to 1:30....then it was the JP4, then after the next fadeout 2:21 the JP-2.......

I guess since I ran each of the pipes live I am basing my opinion off what I seen in person....Unfortunately I was spending more time tuning in the pipes then I was taking good video...so these clips are less then perfect..... However I will go out to test the JP-1 exclusively and take the time to get a perfect tune..... I am pretty sure the JP-1 takes the cake...it has great bottom and IMO quite a bit more top RPM then the 2035.....I am going to try the 2035 myself in the next couple of days....

JP-1 has way more top-end than the 2035

I agree, the JP1 revs much higher then the 2035

..from the videos, I agree too, BUT, wether that makes any difference on most tracks is another story. The 2035 has nice blipping power..if the JP-1 has the same feel down low, then mileage will be the only factor for me. Both pipes are a good match.

The Jp-3 is my favorite at this point, power anywhere and 10 mins. on your tank, broken in and tuned and leaned alittle goes 12, get the right tires and dont drive like a freak!

a big +1
Theirs are all ramped up for power although mine stock at just over half gallon in truggy looks like easily 12min per tank w/jp3 on small track and more than enouph power. As my jl keeps leaning out i can see on a Big track still getting 11 easily. Mighty impressive for $175