Community
Wiki Posts
Search

JP-1 vs. JP-3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2010 | 10:48 AM
  #16  
jmaxey51's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,917
From: Athens, GA
Default

what engine do you have or putting it on? that will tell you more.... my JPX gets more power and run time running the JP3 but WS7 gets better run time with JP1. its all about the engine. its all what you want, driving style etc, no one can tell you the right pipe for all engines, the pipe that works on one engine might and probably wont work on a different engine.

these are the engine pipe combos that worked for me:
Alpha engines - alpha 0801 pipe
GRP - 2053 (i think)
RB C6 - RB 2045
JPX 21 - JP3 or RB 2045 (for smoother power)
OD SS 21 - JP3 (for power but only 7 min run time) and 053 for 10-11 min run time


right there kinda shows that you cant get one pipe to fit all engines. the dynamite 053 always seems to get the most run time but some engines it doesnt get the power i need. the JP series are good pipes, the JP4 seems to be the best all around pipe for power and run time tho. the JP1 and JP3 seem to suck the fuel compared to JP4. IMO if you want a JP pipe get the JP4
jmaxey51 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010 | 11:56 AM
  #17  
-R2-'s Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,268
From: So Cal.
Default

Jp-1 bottom power, Jp-2 high speed, Jp-3 a lil of both but uses fuel, Jp-4 smooth responce to bottom,efra rules for sound,top speed but takes a while to get there, and good fuel milage.
-R2- is offline  
Old 09-22-2010 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
mblgjr's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (86)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,179
From: AL
Default

Originally Posted by tom slick 50
wow i cant get nine out of mine
Mine goes about 9:45 in a truggy; but again; that's geared SHORT and on a loose/slick track (wheelspin) and a lot of stop and go on a short track. I'm sure on a bigger more flowing track it would be a good bit better
mblgjr is offline  
Old 09-23-2010 | 09:14 AM
  #19  
off road god's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 972
From: chattanooga,tn
Default

Hey Mo, On the B5 Ive played with the JP1,2,3,and 4. and the 2013. In a 2.0 buggy.
2013..good performance,bad mileage.
Jp1..great bottom,no top.
Jp2..pretty good from bottom to top,fair mileage.
Jp3..smooth bottom,good top,good mileage.
Jp4..good bottom,great top.best mileage of all the pipes.
off road god is offline  
Old 09-23-2010 | 12:43 PM
  #20  
Stubbs's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,185
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Holy thread resurrection Batman! Y'all did notice that Mo asked this question about 18 months ago, right?

Of course, I had been wondering the same thing, so I'm glad it got started again.
Stubbs is offline  
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:41 PM
  #21  
off road god's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 972
From: chattanooga,tn
Default

No....I hadnt noticed it.

I like JP pipes. Some do,some dont.
Ive had 1,2 and 3 for some time and for most applications Ive ran the 3.
Just got the 4 a couple of weeks ago to try on the B5 and I really liked it. Not quite as much bottom as the 2013 but plenty enough.
off road god is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.