Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

RB Concept Engine Thread..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2009 | 05:11 AM
  #76  
triggerman101's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: mid mo
Default

nice stuff. ive been wondering which motor to get for my buggy. a ninja jx21, jamminjpx21, trinity platnum draked 21, and now the rb s5. im leaning towards the s5 after reading this, or maybe the s7 l2g.
triggerman101 is offline  
Old 01-14-2009 | 10:18 PM
  #77  
Zerodefect's Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,027
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by chris c
any recommendations for a pipe on a s7. It was way weak on the bottom but insane on the top. Motor has about 1.5 gallons thru it. Had a JP-1 on it

Its not the engines fault. With a jp-1 an S7 should be a monster when tuned right. ( and a complete fuel hog). I run a jp-1 and WS7III. You just need to put in 1.1 clutch springs for the S7 to get her going down low.

I'd lose the JP-1. I hate mine. Going to try a Dynamite 053 next. I've never needed more bottom end but my bottom isn't the strongest. If I lose a little bottom with the 053 but pick up fuel mileage I'll be ok.
Zerodefect is offline  
Old 01-20-2009 | 10:22 AM
  #78  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

Originally Posted by Zerodefect
Its not the engines fault. With a jp-1 an S7 should be a monster when tuned right. ( and a complete fuel hog). I run a jp-1 and WS7III. You just need to put in 1.1 clutch springs for the S7 to get her going down low.

I'd lose the JP-1. I hate mine. Going to try a Dynamite 053 next. I've never needed more bottom end but my bottom isn't the strongest. If I lose a little bottom with the 053 but pick up fuel mileage I'll be ok.
I have used the 086 pipe in the S7, buttloads of bottom, with great top end also, the best is the RB 2045 w/192 or 198 header, and better fuel economy.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 01-20-2009 | 10:24 AM
  #79  
aznitronut's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,486
From: Phx. Az
Default

In my experience with the JP pipes, they tend to make engines run hotter.
aznitronut is offline  
Old 02-05-2009 | 09:30 AM
  #80  
bjr48's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 274
Default

I posted this in the On-road Exclusive Engine section this morning thinking I was on the off-road side. Both threads are pretty much dead so maybe this will start one of them off keeping track of what 2009 is bringing for RB...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://rcspecial.com/news/?p=14715#more-14715


I'd like to keep track of what RB is doing this year. I was going to get an S5 for the 2009 season but since OS fixed my VG under warranty and I took a paycut at my job I'll be lucky to just break it in and buy fuel this season. I still want to keep track of RB as they will 99% be likely to be my next engine whenever that may be 2009, 2010?
What's the scoop on the new engines?

I can only find the pictures I posted, no news. Is it possible that they are a 9 port engine?! I'm guessing that may just as likely be a year 2009 designation (.9 in the name of the engine). The 3 offroad engines are the B.9, WS.9, and S.9 if you look at the business cards in front of each.
bjr48 is offline  
Old 02-05-2009 | 05:50 PM
  #81  
buggydad's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by bjr48
I posted this in the On-road Exclusive Engine section this morning thinking I was on the off-road side. Both threads are pretty much dead so maybe this will start one of them off keeping track of what 2009 is bringing for RB...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://rcspecial.com/news/?p=14715#more-14715


I'd like to keep track of what RB is doing this year. I was going to get an S5 for the 2009 season but since OS fixed my VG under warranty and I took a paycut at my job I'll be lucky to just break it in and buy fuel this season. I still want to keep track of RB as they will 99% be likely to be my next engine whenever that may be 2009, 2010?
What's the scoop on the new engines?

I can only find the pictures I posted, no news. Is it possible that they are a 9 port engine?! I'm guessing that may just as likely be a year 2009 designation (.9 in the name of the engine). The 3 offroad engines are the B.9, WS.9, and S.9 if you look at the business cards in front of each.
Wow when are these babies coming out i was about to buy 2 ws73 next week but i will holod off if these are coming soon??? And whats going on with the US Spec C ?
buggydad is offline  
Old 02-05-2009 | 10:05 PM
  #82  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 330
From: where every i lay my hat.
Default

anyone here have a used ws7III case? or a bad motor with a good case?

pm me or send email to [email protected]
thanks
csdonnie is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 07:31 AM
  #83  
Zerodefect's Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,027
From: Columbus, OH
Default

TRUE OR FALSE with RB's:

S3 S5 S7 WS7 : all have same crankcase, bearings, conrod.

S5 S7 WS7: have the same crankshaft, the WS7 has a hardcoating

WS7 turbo head: fits the S engines

RB & Novarosi plugs are the same


If parts are interchangeable then we can rebuild boken RB's with S5's and S3's for cheap.
Zerodefect is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 07:48 AM
  #84  
markr04's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 421
From: TX
Default

I have a C5. It's not doing it for me. I don't have anything against RB Concepts and it's not a terrible engine... it's just not worth anywhere near the price IMO. As soon as it goes bad, I'm going to replace it with a Dynamite or Go engine around the $180-$200 mark.

I realize I just pooped in this thread and I'll get my nose rubbed in it, but that's okay. It's my experience and opinion about my C5, and it could be a fluke engine.
markr04 is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 09:14 AM
  #85  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 188
From: Saskatoon, Sask. Canada
Default

I have a modded c6 that makes sick power in my jammin buggy. I run a jp-4 pipe on it and it seems awesome. I tried a dynamite 086 and it didn't seem to work aswell as the jp-4. I have read in the past that the rb2045 kills some of the power that the c6 makes is this true. I have one and never tried it, I have no way to test it at this time of year because we have a lot of snow outside and I am heading to a indoor race at the end of the month and was wanting some input on the rb2045 pipe and if you have tried the jp-4 and what worked better the jp-4 or the rb2045
thanks in advance
big_klemo is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 09:18 AM
  #86  
markr04's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 421
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by big_klemo
I have a modded c6 that makes sick power in my jammin buggy. I run a jp-4 pipe on it and it seems awesome. I tried a dynamite 086 and it didn't seem to work aswell as the jp-4. I have read in the past that the rb2045 kills some of the power that the c6 makes is this true. I have one and never tried it, I have no way to test it at this time of year because we have a lot of snow outside and I am heading to a indoor race at the end of the month and was wanting some input on the rb2045 pipe and if you have tried the jp-4 and what worked better the jp-4 or the rb2045
thanks in advance
I had a similar question about my C5 and a pipe. I ended up at the RB Concepts forum where I saw that the 086 is the pipe of choice for the C5.

You might look in the RB forum and find your question answered.
markr04 is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 09:52 AM
  #87  
Charles Godwin's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,136
From: UK (England)
Default

Have never run the JP-4 pipe but i have run the RB 2045 pipe with the C6 and WS7. To me it just makes the engines just that little more driveable. On the C6 i have (which i am still running in) it has mega drive out of the corners (almost to much and this is on dry high grip astro!!!). It does have a nice linear feel to it throughout the powerband which is good. I plan on running the RB 3001 pipe to see if it can make it any smoother (i like smooth ) and possibly get more run-time (i get 10mins easy now on the WS7 and it isn't leaned out)
Charles Godwin is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 10:29 AM
  #88  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,266
From: Coral gables, Florida
Default

My track has big jumps with short run ups. With the 2045 I could not always clear them but with the jp4 it's no problem. I get 12 minutes with the 2045 and 10 with the jp4.
infanterene is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 04:28 PM
  #89  
tony montana's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,500
From: Leonardtown Md.
Default

I agree. I had the 2045 on my s7 and I couldnt make the coming out of corner jumps. I have since put a jp4 on it but I havent raced with it yet. Another thing with the 2045 is I didnt get very good runtime. Only around 6 minutes. I have the standard s7 l2g and wondering if I can out the turbo button on it?
tony montana is offline  
Old 02-06-2009 | 06:20 PM
  #90  
markfanelli's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 303
From: MD
Default

KC, I've used the 2045 with my S7 since day one and it has plenty of power all around. 8min runtime was never a problem. But, my S7 has the turbo head and yes you could switch yours over if you wanted to.
markfanelli is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.