Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree77Likes

TLR 22X-4 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2026 | 06:32 AM
  #61  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by fifi
Is 20.2 normal for filling up the diff or there was an update?
It seems low.
What are you guys using?
I am using what the book recommends, 13.4 for composite ring and pinion and internal gears. No issues with the fluid.
HOTROD716 is offline  
Old 04-30-2026 | 03:08 PM
  #62  
fifi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by HOTROD716
I am using what the book recommends, 13.4 for composite ring and pinion and internal gears. No issues with the fluid.
20.2 with metal gear it s not even to the top of the cross pin. I tried 20.5 and it didn't spill when closing it.
I feel like it's like the original and an update or revision should come.
fifi is offline  
Old 04-30-2026 | 07:12 PM
  #63  
RazorRC's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,001
Default

Originally Posted by fifi
20.2 with metal gear it s not even to the top of the cross pin. I tried 20.5 and it didn't spill when closing it.
I feel like it's like the original and an update or revision should come.
I’m running a little more than what the book recommended, it seemed a little light to me.
fifi likes this.
RazorRC is offline  
Old 05-05-2026 | 03:03 PM
  #64  
fifi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 326
Default

After 1 race on my new car I notice a lot of wear on the front axle dogbone. Running 5.5 motor on outdoor flat astroturf. The slipper and one way was set as manual.
Differential were set per manual too.
fifi is offline  
Old 05-10-2026 | 08:06 AM
  #65  
fifi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Slipper and diff set as manual.
Slipper and diff set as manual.
fifi is offline  
Old 05-11-2026 | 06:48 AM
  #66  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

That is crazy wear! I wonder if you use a CVA setup would be more beneficial?
HOTROD716 is offline  
Old 05-13-2026 | 06:02 PM
  #67  
Matt M.'s Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,678
Default

contact horizon customer service, the will take care of you
wydopen likes this.
Matt M. is offline  
Old 05-14-2026 | 12:04 AM
  #68  
Horatio's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,205
From: Wales, UK
Default

My Elite uses CVD type inputs into the diff housings and MOD bimetallic centre drive with pucks to save wear. You have to watch for wear on the pins still in the input CVDs, but they have 2 sets of holes.

With the 2.0, I think this in conjunction with a decoupled slipper and mod motor must be very hard on the inputs.

If or when I get a 2.0, I'll be setting it up like my Elite - with a centre diff and MOD driveline. 4.5T motor is very unforgiving.

Unless you use hardened spring steel inputs and/or pin cushions - this is going to be a recurring problem for anyone using mod motors on carpet. 🤞

It will be interesting to see what Horizon suggest. Rinse repeat isn't really a viable option. Something has to be changed.
Horatio is offline  
Old 05-14-2026 | 06:06 AM
  #69  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by Horatio
My Elite uses CVD type inputs into the diff housings and MOD bimetallic centre drive with pucks to save wear. You have to watch for wear on the pins still in the input CVDs, but they have 2 sets of holes.

With the 2.0, I think this in conjunction with a decoupled slipper and mod motor must be very hard on the inputs.

If or when I get a 2.0, I'll be setting it up like my Elite - with a centre diff and MOD driveline. 4.5T motor is very unforgiving.

Unless you use hardened spring steel inputs and/or pin cushions - this is going to be a recurring problem for anyone using mod motors on carpet. 🤞

It will be interesting to see what Horizon suggest. Rinse repeat isn't really a viable option. Something has to be changed.

I am using the MOD puck system on my 2.0. You will need to get an extra extended CV barrel end, the rear shaft is a bit too short for the 2.0, there is extra slop. The driveshaft sits just at the end of the center diff outdrive.
Horatio likes this.
HOTROD716 is offline  
Old 05-14-2026 | 02:36 PM
  #70  
fifi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 326
Default

I will ask the shop where I bought the car to see what he can do.
fifi is offline  
Old 05-14-2026 | 03:38 PM
  #71  
Tech Master
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,568
From: Indy
Default

Originally Posted by HOTROD716
I am using the MOD puck system on my 2.0. You will need to get an extra extended CV barrel end, the rear shaft is a bit too short for the 2.0, there is extra slop. The driveshaft sits just at the end of the center diff outdrive.
Picture?
AxiomJacob is offline  
Old 05-15-2026 | 01:19 AM
  #72  
Horatio's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,205
From: Wales, UK
Default

Originally Posted by HOTROD716
I am using the MOD puck system on my 2.0. You will need to get an extra extended CV barrel end, the rear shaft is a bit too short for the 2.0, there is extra slop. The driveshaft sits just at the end of the center diff outdrive.
I was thinking of upgrading my Elite to a 2.0, Gullwings, 13mm shocks, lower shock towers, upgraded transmission housings - but using a centre diff instead of the decoupled slipper and keeping the carbon fibre chassis. This means all the advantages of the 2.0, but with the aggressive handling of the Elite, which is now something I have become accustomed to. It's 3mm shorter this way (compared to the 2.0 chassis). But much lighter and with bimetallic centre drive, MOD pucks etc.



Team OPS driver now, so need to ensure I maintain some sort of competitive edge. The slightly shorter wheelbase is totally acceptable for those who are used to it - and the buggy is quicker for it, provided consistency is maintained.
Horatio is offline  
Old 05-15-2026 | 06:01 AM
  #73  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by AxiomJacob
Picture?
See post 72, I need to use 2 of the longer CV barrels to not have the rear be so close to the edge. Another thought, which I have not done, is possibly using the b74 setup. That has a 95mm rear bone.
Horatio likes this.
HOTROD716 is offline  
Old 05-25-2026 | 09:01 AM
  #74  
fifi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Sway bar kit is the same part number for elite and 2.0.
But the 2.0 require a larger size in the middle.
Tlr234126.
fifi is offline  
Old 05-26-2026 | 07:47 AM
  #75  
HOTROD716's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 648
From: WNY
Default

Originally Posted by fifi
Sway bar kit is the same part number for elite and 2.0.
But the 2.0 require a larger size in the middle.
Tlr234126.
The part number has been redesigned for the 2.0. The center section is longer than the elite version, accommodating for the 2.0 redesign of the sway bar mount.
HOTROD716 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.