Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Caring for LiHV is a bit different than standard LiPo >

Caring for LiHV is a bit different than standard LiPo

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree41Likes

Caring for LiHV is a bit different than standard LiPo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2022 | 01:28 AM
  #31  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 21
Default

Interesting thread. how would a 7,4V charge impact on capacity?
Lets say we have 6100 mAh 7,6 HV lipo. Guess the capacity would decrease if charged as 7,4V LiPo?
Is there any way to recalculate the mAh so it's corresponding with 7,4V?

Example 6100mAh@7,6V or 5800mAh@7,4V
sx3-swe is offline  
Old 08-24-2022 | 10:26 AM
  #32  
TurnNBurn's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,825
From: Miami, FL
Default

First off, don’t assume that higher voltage means more speed - if your cells don’t have a low Internal Resistance, all bets are off. It’s all about Ohm’s Law… The owner of the hobby shop I used to buy from back in the day used to say, “At your level of competition, batteries win the race - don’t spend your money anywhere else if you don’t have the juice to drive it.” Believe me, back in the days of matched and graded sub-C cell packs, better batteries quickly got me up from the C mains to the top of the B’s statewide, and winning series’ at my local track. Anyway, IMHO, it’s just a matter of time before the sanctioning bodies just allow charging to 4.35. I think the biggest driver is that as cells deteriorate and people end up buying new cells (LiHV), there will be less worry and pushback about people having to buy new packs.

I wouldn’t go around saying that LiHV’s are just glorified LiPo’s though. By classifying them as LiHV’s, the companies are basically assuring you that you can charge it to 4.35/cell SAFELY (as safe as LiPo’s cells can be, anyway). I know that I wouldn’t feel comfortable charging a standard LiPo cell to 4.35V. Care wise, I would just charge them to 4.20 (if competing under current sanctioning rules, special allowances excepted, of course), and store them at 3.8V, or whatever voltage works for you (I know people have differing opinions on that)… but I predict that one day soon, ROAR and the other sanctioning bodies will raise the ceiling to 4.35V when they think it will have minimum impact on the user base.

TurnNBurn is offline  
Old 08-24-2022 | 06:01 PM
  #33  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by TurnNBurn
First off, don’t assume that higher voltage means more speed - if your cells don’t have a low Internal Resistance, all bets are off. It’s all about Ohm’s Law… The owner of the hobby shop I used to buy from back in the day used to say, “At your level of competition, batteries win the race - don’t spend your money anywhere else if you don’t have the juice to drive it.” Believe me, back in the days of matched and graded sub-C cell packs, better batteries quickly got me up from the C mains to the top of the B’s statewide, and winning series’ at my local track. Anyway, IMHO, it’s just a matter of time before the sanctioning bodies just allow charging to 4.35. I think the biggest driver is that as cells deteriorate and people end up buying new cells (LiHV), there will be less worry and pushback about people having to buy new packs.

I wouldn’t go around saying that LiHV’s are just glorified LiPo’s though. By classifying them as LiHV’s, the companies are basically assuring you that you can charge it to 4.35/cell SAFELY (as safe as LiPo’s cells can be, anyway). I know that I wouldn’t feel comfortable charging a standard LiPo cell to 4.35V. Care wise, I would just charge them to 4.20 (if competing under current sanctioning rules, special allowances excepted, of course), and store them at 3.8V, or whatever voltage works for you (I know people have differing opinions on that)… but I predict that one day soon, ROAR and the other sanctioning bodies will raise the ceiling to 4.35V when they think it will have minimum impact on the user base.
I don't think there's much point to allowing charging to 4.35. The voltage curve drops rapidly at that level, it won't make racing better, and it just wears out the batteries faster.

Plus not all new packs are sold as LiHV. There's still a lot of high end batteries that advertise standard LiPo voltages.

Last edited by gigaplex; 08-24-2022 at 07:08 PM.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 08-28-2022 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 186
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Default

For me it has not been about that extra voltage , but it seems to have less degradation over time and easy to maintain!
the rc guy likes this.
Logante is offline  
Old 08-28-2022 | 06:52 PM
  #35  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 184
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by sx3-swe
Interesting thread. how would a 7,4V charge impact on capacity?
Lets say we have 6100 mAh 7,6 HV lipo. Guess the capacity would decrease if charged as 7,4V LiPo?
Is there any way to recalculate the mAh so it's corresponding with 7,4V?

Example 6100mAh@7,6V or 5800mAh@7,4V
Testing my own batteries, it's roughly 10%
gigaplex likes this.
Team Steve is offline  
Old 08-28-2022 | 07:29 PM
  #36  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Logante
For me it has not been about that extra voltage , but it seems to have less degradation over time and easy to maintain!
I've not seen any improvements with longevity between my LiPo and LiHV packs.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 09-08-2022 | 11:39 AM
  #37  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
From: Maryland
Default

Good read interesting to know.
Pocket_Fred is offline  
Old 10-19-2022 | 08:13 PM
  #38  
mac853's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,987
From: Dirty place
Default

As I saw many rules in Europe, US or even in Japan are tighly restricted of batteries just charge until 8.4, if goes into 8.44 would be considered overcharge then would be hardly penalized.

But i saw in somewhere of Southeast Asia still allow charge until 8.44.

Then I verified Lipo would swelling in case charge it 8.44.

Could someone tell in case the rules is allowed 8.44 would have advantage for LIHV than LIPO?

Could someone tell me LIHV could be charge with 2C?

Anyone would fully charge LIHV until 8.7 then discharge it until 8.4 before race for better perform?
mac853 is offline  
Old 10-19-2022 | 08:21 PM
  #39  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by mac853
As I saw many rules in Europe, US or even in Japan are tighly restricted of batteries just charge until 8.4, if goes into 8.44 would be considered overcharge then would be hardly penalized.

But i saw in somewhere of Southeast Asia still allow charge until 8.44.

Then I verified Lipo would swelling in case charge it 8.44.

Could someone tell in case the rules is allowed 8.44 would have advantage for LIHV than LIPO?

Could someone tell me LIHV could be charge with 2C?

Anyone would fully charge LIHV until 8.7 then discharge it until 8.4 before race for better perform?
Charging a regular LiPo to 8.44 won't cause swelling by itself, that's within normal voltage tolerances.

LiHV won't benefit from 8.44V any more than a LiPo would.

LiHV and LiPo can both be charged with 2C (assuming the rules allow).

Charging a LiHV to 8.7V then discharging to 8.4V won't perform any better than just charging to 8.4V directly, other than marginal internal heating which could lower the IR. But you can do that without overcharging, people already cycle the packs.
mac853 likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 10-19-2022 | 10:00 PM
  #40  
mac853's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,987
From: Dirty place
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
Charging a regular LiPo to 8.44 won't cause swelling by itself, that's within normal voltage tolerances.

LiHV won't benefit from 8.44V any more than a LiPo would.

LiHV and LiPo can both be charged with 2C (assuming the rules allow).

Charging a LiHV to 8.7V then discharging to 8.4V won't perform any better than just charging to 8.4V directly, other than marginal internal heating which could lower the IR. But you can do that without overcharging, people already cycle the packs.
Thanks for clarifying about LIHV which I never used before therefore I still don't understand why there's many manufacturers only release LIHV then many people like to use them.
mac853 is offline  
Old 10-19-2022 | 11:23 PM
  #41  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by mac853
Thanks for clarifying about LIHV which I never used before therefore I still don't understand why there's many manufacturers only release LIHV then many people like to use them.
Marketing/perception. Usable capacity, weight, IR are all that really matters.
mac853 likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 10-21-2022 | 09:02 AM
  #42  
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,538
From: Lynnwood, Washington
Default

For indoor black carpet the trend is ULCG batteries. After checking 8 band new batteries, most of them LIHV, from different manufacturers the big majority of them have ok to terrible IR. You have to blast them with high current for them to have average IR.
malkiy is offline  
Old 10-21-2022 | 03:31 PM
  #43  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by malkiy
For indoor black carpet the trend is ULCG batteries. After checking 8 band new batteries, most of them LIHV, from different manufacturers the big majority of them have ok to terrible IR. You have to blast them with high current for them to have average IR.
ULCG batteries tend to have higher IR in general - smaller cells with less surface area.
Speed 8 likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 10-21-2022 | 04:12 PM
  #44  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
ULCG batteries tend to have higher IR in general - smaller cells with less surface area.
What's a good IR? Brand New protek 7400 lihv with 1.8 IR both cells.
Xrayray is offline  
Old 10-21-2022 | 05:55 PM
  #45  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,762
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Xrayray
What's a good IR? Brand New protek 7400 lihv with 1.8 IR both cells.
Your charger and charge leads will play a big part in the measured numbers, but under 2 per cell is pretty good.
Xrayray likes this.
gigaplex is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.