Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Oval, Larger Scales and More
New 1/8th 4WD basic class ???!!! >

New 1/8th 4WD basic class ???!!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree27Likes

New 1/8th 4WD basic class ???!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2019 | 08:27 AM
  #271  
1/8 IC Fan's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,646
From: Holland, MI
Default

Time to Bump This Up. Checking in to see who is still running the Car, not as a Drag racer! But actually on a Track.

1/8 IC Fan is offline  
Old 12-11-2019 | 10:00 AM
  #272  
strodedawg's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,753
From: Philly, PA
Default

getting one after christmas to run in the spring.
strodedawg is offline  
Old 12-11-2019 | 10:23 AM
  #273  
1/8 IC Fan's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,646
From: Holland, MI
Default

Nice, you'll like it. Congrats
1/8 IC Fan is offline  
Old 09-29-2020 | 03:32 PM
  #274  
Harold996tt's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 128
Default

After years away from 1/8 (was into 1/8 gas) this whole pan car thing has me interested due to the simplicity and cleanliness. Have finally got three quarters of the way through the build of my 2.1 Evo. Does anyone have a starting reference for roll out and a starting point for tire diameter for these pan cars on a mid size 1/8 track? Much thanks in advance.
jetnjme likes this.
Harold996tt is offline  
Old 09-29-2020 | 05:15 PM
  #275  
jetnjme's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,176
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

I’m going to start tires at 66 front 73 rear as I already have them cut. I’ll play with the pinion / spur combo and get somewhere close to this starting roll out of 66mm



jetnjme is offline  
Old 09-29-2020 | 05:17 PM
  #276  
jetnjme's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,176
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Here is an older gear chart. Tire diameter up top. Believe stock spur on evo is 53, bottom portion



jetnjme is offline  
Old 10-06-2020 | 09:41 AM
  #277  
jetnjme's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,176
From: Sacramento, CA
Default


Buri racer e2.1 evo on the right (bottom) and the e1.3 evo on the left (top). not sure why images keep rotting... ill figure it out soon
mike_G likes this.
jetnjme is offline  
Old 10-11-2020 | 02:58 AM
  #278  
Julius's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,063
From: Amsterdam Netherlands
Default

Anyone have the internal ratios for the various buri cars?
intersted to see the amount of overdrive to the front.

thanks
Julius is offline  
Old 10-15-2020 | 06:04 AM
  #279  
jetnjme's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,176
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Working on the body



jetnjme is offline  
Old 10-17-2020 | 03:55 AM
  #280  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 14
From: Cologne
Default

Originally Posted by Julius
Anyone have the internal ratios for the various buri cars?
intersted to see the amount of overdrive to the front.

thanks
I used to have a Buri E1.2. On the E1.x the ratio of the rear to front pulley was 31/28.
With the common size of tire diameter 70mm rear / 64mm front the overdrive was around 1%. I‘m not sure about the E2.1, but I would assume that it is similar.

This is why I was very surprised when I found that the Taipan has a much larger overdrive ratio. With the rear and front pulleys being 28/24 that amounts to over 6% of overdrive with 70/64mm tires. When I initially started running the Taipan I thougt I should aim for a similar overdrive ratio than what I was used to from the Buri. Also I read in various places that the nitro folks typically run no more than 3% or maybe maximum up to 5%, so the standard setup of over 6% seemed a lot. Consequently I trued down the front tires to get back into the range of no more than 3%, but that cost me a lot of front ride height and more importantly it shortened the possible run time which I could get out of a set of front tires, compared to the rear.

So I went back to running 70/64mm and it seems to work fine. But to this day I still wonder if this large overdrive is intentional by Serpent and why. Perhaps the unsprung rear axle setup and lower weight somehow requires more overdrive to get a car that‘s easier to drive?

At some point I also thought perhaps Serpent just used pulleys which they had from existing cars, but I couldn‘t find another recent Serpent 1/8 that uses a 24 tooth pulley anywhere in the drive train, so that part seems to be custom designed for the Taipan. Which makes me think, that the large overdrive is intentional.

What are your thoughts on this?
xprainman is offline  
Old 12-02-2020 | 03:57 AM
  #281  
TomAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
From: Austria
Default

Hi,
the standard BURIs E1 and E2 internal ratio is 31t rear to 28t front - so we run with standard set of tire diameter 70 / 64 mm, with smaller tires maybe 67 / 63 mm

BURI-Racer offers optional pulleys either 3d-printed or aluminium with less split: 30t rear and 29t front - we run 70 / 68 mm tires or even smaller with 67 / 66 mm, so we can run longer with the front tires...

compare with the other brands: ARC: 36t rear / 34t front, Corally: 32t rear / 28t front, Capricorn: 31t rear / 28t front
in my opinion the Serpent ratio 28/24 is by far too much...
TomAT is offline  
Old 02-13-2022 | 11:08 AM
  #282  
TomAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
From: Austria
Smile 2 new BURI-Racer E1.4 and E2.2 in 2022

Hi to all,
I just launched the latest versions of my 2 cars with a lot of improvements:
- the side belt type BURI-Racer E1.4 and
- the midle belt type BURI-Racer E2.2
just look at attached file for more detailed information - the new website will be unlocked in the next days




BURI-Racer E1.4 roller chassis

full equipped BURI-Racer E1.4

BURI-Racer E2.2 roller chassis
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
BURI-Racer E1.4 and E2.2.pdf (991.2 KB, 242 views)
TomAT is offline  
Old 02-13-2022 | 05:02 PM
  #283  
Sir 51D3WAYS's Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 7,181
From: Stuck in urban hell
Default

What's the difference between the 2 belt layouts?
Sir 51D3WAYS is offline  
Old 02-14-2022 | 12:30 AM
  #284  
TomAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
From: Austria
Default

The side belt version E1 is the more flexible one regarding equipment: you can install all battery types from 4s block to 2x 2s stick or shorties. There is also more space for the motor and the controller... This version is very smooth to drive, with low practice you will be quick to get fast laptimes.

The middle belt version E2 is more limited: you can use only 2x2s sticks or shorties. The maximum lenght of the motor is limited with 68mm and for the controller size Hobbywing XR8sct is recommended.... This version has a rather agressive driving style, so you have to get used to this. It needs a bit more practice and fine setup to reach fast laptimes.
Sir 51D3WAYS likes this.
TomAT is offline  
Old 02-14-2022 | 01:20 AM
  #285  
Sir 51D3WAYS's Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 7,181
From: Stuck in urban hell
Default

^Interesting. Thanks for the info. Can these handle bumpy tracks? (or atleast bumpy as can be for normal 1/8 full suspension GP cars)

Can it keep up with the normal cars performance/run time wise? I'm toying with the idea of getting one as a cheaper alternative to the full fledged affair.

Rear spool and front one way I assume?
Sir 51D3WAYS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.