Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Digital Servos from China >

Digital Servos from China

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree215Likes

Digital Servos from China

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2021 | 11:53 PM
  #241  
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 734
From: California
Default

Wow 10 race days only from AGF servos?

I'll count myself lucky that I've never had a servo go bad or break any gears (even when I first started out).

Savox 1257tg was my first one, put in my first 2wd buggy, never had a problem, just noisy (like noticeably) and rough (like when you spin it with your fingers it was rough and hard). Same deal with other savox, kopropo and other no-name chinese servos.
team powers DCS V1 was my first "expensive" servo at $110 - put in a 4wd buggy (crashed a ton, like smack full speed into a pillar hard) never had a problem. Smooth when you turn the gears with your fingers (I don't know if this is an actually beneficial servo trait or just a cool effect). 4+ years later still going strong in my nitro tc.
Have since only used their (team powers) servos with the most recent one the SRS V2 brushless one. Never had one go bad never broke the gears. Also very fast and SSR compatible. Although albeit I don't race 1/8 scale just 1/10 onroad and offroad.

If the gears do strip, they are readily available for $25.

rcbuggy88 is offline  
Old 02-15-2021 | 02:31 AM
  #242  
the wrench's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
I'm not interested in taking the CT1 apart, though if it ever snaps a pin on one of the gears then I will certainly compare pin thickness to see if they upgraded to thicker pins or not, as far as getting into the circuit board, I tried that already with a burned up servo and couldn't figure out how to get any farther than replacing the gears.

When I installed the CT1, I didn't have to change a single setting on my trim, car tracked perfectly straight and EPA was spot on with the A80, the feel of the CT1 was identical as the A80 on the track as well. I was always VERY happy withe A80 performance... while it was working, ha!

They're going to do a new layout for the Lonestar Challenge in a few weeks, and Joey The Dirt is known for making extremely challenging layouts so that will put the CT1 to the test for sure!
hey bill, have you tried using the agf programmer with the CT1?
the wrench is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 12:43 AM
  #243  
themountain's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 267
From: Barcelona
Default

Originally Posted by the wrench
thanks for the quick reply Bill, hoping for your teardown and compare soon, the nitropro servo seems to be the agf a80bhmw spec sheet wise, i was thinking of going with the reefs 444 winch servo, as its just rebranded magnetic encoder deal, the 444 standard version is a coreless motor,...
Well the reefs is a rebranded AGF also only sold for 2times as much
themountain is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 03:55 AM
  #244  
the wrench's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by themountain
Well the reefs is a rebranded AGF also only sold for 2times as much
so are nitropro, send it, powerhobby, probably more... what id really like to know is who did agf oem for before reefs, i keep hearing and reading agf has been an oem for years but only recently, within i feel the last 3 years they are prominent, to me, they came out of no where like savox did, than flooded the market...now i wonder if my BK is a rebrand, excellent servo, precise like nothing ive ever had, but i cant find replacement gears anymore ... regardless of price increase for the rebrands, i like knowing i dont have to wait months to get parts or a replacement, im being suckered in because i really like the software tweaking to dial in feel and hopeful to added resolution in ssr mode...not response time
the wrench is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 06:26 AM
  #245  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

Here's the thing that I'm trying to wrap my head around... if AGF is the OEM but someone pays them to improve their design with higher quality components, is it still an rebrand or a whole new brand?


For example, (Toyota --> Lexus) or (Nissan --> Infiniti), do people go around who drive a Lexus or Infiniti say they are driving rebranded Toyota's and Nissan's respectively? Just like with AGF, the chassis/body are the same and no doubt both car brands are manufactured in the same plants, but Lexus and Infiniti will get higher quality components installed which is what sets them apart, just like all these aftermarket servo brands who come up with their own specs to improve the half baked design by AGF... I would rather invest in a full baked design (NitroPro, Reefs, etc) with quality components than to waste any more of my money on the trash that AGF is selling.
Silverbullet555 likes this.

Last edited by billdelong; 02-18-2021 at 08:00 AM.
billdelong is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 07:28 AM
  #246  
the wrench's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
Here's the thing that I'm trying to wrap my head around... if AGF is the OEM but someone pays them to improve their design with higher quality components, is it still an rebrand or a whole new brand?


For example, (Toyota --> Lexus) or (Honda --> Infinity), do people go around who drive a Lexus or Infinity say they are driving rebranded Toyota's and Honda's respectively? Just like with AGF, the chassis/body are the same and no doubt both car brands are manufactured in the same plants, but Lexus and Infinity will get higher quality components installed which is what sets them apart, just like all these aftermarket servo brands who come up with their own specs to improve the half baked design by AGF... I would rather invest in a full baked design (NitroPro, Reefs, etc) with quality components than to waste any more of my money on the trash that AGF is selling.
end of the day, same company, same components, full leather interior isnt exactly higher grade running gear, i dont think theres a difference between a camry piston and a lexus piston... so with most these rebrands, i dont really think they are specing smc's, motors, fet's, gear ratios, im leaning they just pick a catalogued offering and slap a logo on em... ps... did you try the programmer with the ct1??
the wrench is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 12:09 PM
  #247  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

Pretty good write up here explaining key differences where they do not use the same components, luxury brands include higher quality with better performance parts, etc:
https://motorandwheels.com/differenc...-toyota-lexus/

That said, I just hooked up the CT1 to the programmer and took a screen shot of the default settings, *** note that the servo name is called A80BHMW:




I did take a screen shot of the default settings for the A80BHSW before it failed to compare with where the only difference I see are the PWM Power and Manufactured Date, this still doesn't show which components have been upgraded internally:




billdelong is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 09:21 PM
  #248  
frewster's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,179
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
Pretty good write up here explaining key differences where they do not use the same components, luxury brands include higher quality with better performance parts, etc:
https://motorandwheels.com/differenc...-toyota-lexus/

That said, I just hooked up the CT1 to the programmer and took a screen shot of the default settings, *** note that the servo name is called A80BHMW:




I did take a screen shot of the default settings for the A80BHSW before it failed to compare with where the only difference I see are the PWM Power and Manufactured Date, this still doesn't show which components have been upgraded internally:

Thanks for the update. I've opened up my A80BHSW and it was easy to see the bottom of the circuit board. It just had some kapton tape on it. What difficulties did you have taking a look?
the wrench likes this.
frewster is offline  
Old 02-16-2021 | 09:26 PM
  #249  
frewster's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,179
Default


​​​​​​Here is what I'm talking about. I was unable to see the other side of the board because it is soldered to the motor and the motor is a very tight fit in the case.
frewster is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 12:20 AM
  #250  
themountain's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 267
From: Barcelona
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
For example, (Toyota --> Lexus) or (Honda --> Infinity), do people go around who drive a Lexus or Infinity say they are driving rebranded Toyota's and Honda's respectively?
I highly doubt thats the case with servos ...all "rebrands" come like they are right out of the factory ....only the price tag is added at the "brand"
themountain is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 12:38 AM
  #251  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 53
Default

I think the Toyota/Lexus point is a really good one but probably not for the same reason why it was originally made. Lexus is a made up brand with the aim of convincing consumers to pay more for a product from the same old manufacturer. All the cars sold around the world as Lexus were sold in the home market as Toyotas.
garnt likes this.
Joshstix is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 02:52 AM
  #252  
the wrench's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
Pretty good write up here explaining key differences where they do not use the same components, luxury brands include higher quality with better performance parts, etc:
https://motorandwheels.com/differenc...-toyota-lexus/

That said, I just hooked up the CT1 to the programmer and took a screen shot of the default settings, *** note that the servo name is called A80BHMW:




I did take a screen shot of the default settings for the A80BHSW before it failed to compare with where the only difference I see are the PWM Power and Manufactured Date, this still doesn't show which components have been upgraded internally:

much appreciated screen shots of the programmer working Bill!.... i ended up going with a nitropro fk-n500fst for the ebuggy, felt the extra few bux is worth supporting a racer run brand, i still politely disagree on your automotive analogy, toyota is toyota is toyota... that article is nothing more than extremely poorly worded marketing nonsense... a camry engine, fitted into a full leather lx something or other, is still the same base... a rebranded nitro pro with sweet graphics is still an a80, atleast in the firmware, also, heres some random russian vid i found of an agf being torn down and the board being swiveled at about 9:03

Last edited by the wrench; 02-17-2021 at 05:25 AM.
the wrench is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 05:36 AM
  #253  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 109
From: Central PA
Default

I purchased an AGF shorty servo about a year ago for my 17.5 buggy. The local pro driver was testing my car for me, first time out with that servo installed and wrecked. The gears stripped, easier than I thought they would. Protek servo went back in the car. I got drunk that night and smashed the AGF servo. That was the end of agf for me lol
Jcharger13 is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 06:32 AM
  #254  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

Originally Posted by frewster
​​​​​​Here is what I'm talking about. I was unable to see the other side of the board because it is soldered to the motor and the motor is a very tight fit in the case.

Yes I can get this far too, but how do you pull the board to actually see the upgraded components??? More specifically I was told that the pots and fets were upgraded, and I don't see any of those components on the bottom


I've given NitroPro the benefit of the doubt that what they are saying is true, and based on my personal experience with two AGF servos failing at close to 10 race days each, one can reasonably deduce that if the NitroPro servo goes longer then they are telling the truth... I'm shocked so many folks are skeptical, anyway I've got 5 race days on the CT1 so just a couple more weeks and the big test will be the Lonestar Challenge which will put me just over the 10 race day mark and a new/challenging layout that I'll surely have a few hard wrecks while learning the jump timing, etc... If the CT1 can make it past that race event then I will be convinced that NitroPro has indeed upgraded the internals.


For the record, I paid $125 cash to Jared Tebo for his servo, I am not sponsored nor do I receive any promotional discount for NitroPro servos, I am going to share 100% of my personal experience without any bias and it's very simple, either the servo will stand the test of time or it won't... I've essentially bet $125 that NitroPro is being honest and have upgraded the internal components over the garbage that AGF is selling.
themountain likes this.

Last edited by billdelong; 02-17-2021 at 10:51 AM.
billdelong is offline  
Old 02-17-2021 | 10:08 AM
  #255  
themountain's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 267
From: Barcelona
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
......upgraded the internal components over the garbage that AGF is selling.
I can certainly understand your frustration about how they treated you, but that statement is a bit harsh.
themountain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.