6563LikesUSGT
01-10-2020 | 05:33 AM
#9601
We run these overseas in the Kleinkram series as a Porsche Cup! Handle nice and neutral!
01-10-2020 | 10:36 AM
#9603
I have 1 unpainted still, been pondering what colour to paint it.
Im presently running the newer Mercedes AMG GT3.. Blue and Silver.. it’s a sexy beast.. they also now have a light weight version
01-10-2020 | 01:36 PM
#9606
01-10-2020 | 03:00 PM
#9607
Tech Addict
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 506
Easy solution, rule makers just need to do a clean slate approach with a 1 year notice. Rules that are clear, concise and if the goal is scale, then clearly state what is and isn't allowed. No grey areas, fact based.
Doesn't have to be complicated but does have to be very clear what the mission statement is about. Right now the rules have 1 foot in the scale camp and the other in the "fast as possible, bend the rules" camp.
If the goal is slower, even racing, then the new motor rule is a step in the right direction. If that is in fact the goal, revising the body list for scale and raising the min at might steer this vs in that direction.
If the goal is a TC 2.0 stock class, then get rid of the motor spec and let it devolve as it was going that way anyway.
Oh and that AMG GT3 is 100% on point for the sport of the class, go back and read page 1 of this thread. Killer looking GT car!
Doesn't have to be complicated but does have to be very clear what the mission statement is about. Right now the rules have 1 foot in the scale camp and the other in the "fast as possible, bend the rules" camp.
If the goal is slower, even racing, then the new motor rule is a step in the right direction. If that is in fact the goal, revising the body list for scale and raising the min at might steer this vs in that direction.
If the goal is a TC 2.0 stock class, then get rid of the motor spec and let it devolve as it was going that way anyway.
Oh and that AMG GT3 is 100% on point for the sport of the class, go back and read page 1 of this thread. Killer looking GT car!
01-10-2020 | 03:13 PM
#9608
01-10-2020 | 07:38 PM
#9612
I see your point....and we will see what happens...Im good on 17.5 or 21.5....
and as far as bodies and those ugly "TC" wheels...you want catch me with those at the Scale Nats....Im so into winning concourse...FINALLY!!!!...lol
and I finished 3rd behind Eric Anderson(EA) and Jason Lutz, at the Music City Champs, with full RCGT against full TC's with boost and turbo...
hold up ....Ive got results and pics...Ill run the Xpatterns anyday
MCC - Stock Touring Car A Main Round# 4, Race# 1
________________________Driver___Car#____Laps____R aceTime____Fast Lap___Behind_
Eric Anderson #1 27 6:04.717 13.372
Jason Lutz #3 26 6:02.027 13.557
Myron Kinnard #5 26 6:06.509 13.869
and as far as bodies and those ugly "TC" wheels...you want catch me with those at the Scale Nats....Im so into winning concourse...FINALLY!!!!...lol
and I finished 3rd behind Eric Anderson(EA) and Jason Lutz, at the Music City Champs, with full RCGT against full TC's with boost and turbo...
hold up ....Ive got results and pics...Ill run the Xpatterns anyday
MCC - Stock Touring Car A Main Round# 4, Race# 1
________________________Driver___Car#____Laps____R aceTime____Fast Lap___Behind_
Eric Anderson #1 27 6:04.717 13.372
Jason Lutz #3 26 6:02.027 13.557
Myron Kinnard #5 26 6:06.509 13.869
01-10-2020 | 09:36 PM
#9613
Tech Champion
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,032
From: Columbus, OH
Easy solution, rule makers just need to do a clean slate approach with a 1 year notice. Rules that are clear, concise and if the goal is scale, then clearly state what is and isn't allowed. No grey areas, fact based.
Doesn't have to be complicated but does have to be very clear what the mission statement is about. Right now the rules have 1 foot in the scale camp and the other in the "fast as possible, bend the rules" camp.
If the goal is slower, even racing, then the new motor rule is a step in the right direction. If that is in fact the goal, revising the body list for scale and raising the min at might steer this vs in that direction.
If the goal is a TC 2.0 stock class, then get rid of the motor spec and let it devolve as it was going that way anyway.
Oh and that AMG GT3 is 100% on point for the sport of the class, go back and read page 1 of this thread. Killer looking GT car!
Doesn't have to be complicated but does have to be very clear what the mission statement is about. Right now the rules have 1 foot in the scale camp and the other in the "fast as possible, bend the rules" camp.
If the goal is slower, even racing, then the new motor rule is a step in the right direction. If that is in fact the goal, revising the body list for scale and raising the min at might steer this vs in that direction.
If the goal is a TC 2.0 stock class, then get rid of the motor spec and let it devolve as it was going that way anyway.
Oh and that AMG GT3 is 100% on point for the sport of the class, go back and read page 1 of this thread. Killer looking GT car!
Rules are good. Just ban the Zoodiac, Pzero, and Venom bodies.
I can't get on the scale liveries only train, until hobby shops start carrying scale decal sets. I'm not ordering decals from albania or china.
