Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
CVDs vs. universals >

CVDs vs. universals

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree6Likes

CVDs vs. universals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2025 | 12:00 AM
  #31  
Horatio's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,205
From: Wales, UK
Default

Originally Posted by foampervert
If CVDs are just rebuildable universal... why would there be a performance difference (other then bearing size)?
is it because the CVDs have more mating surfaces and thus cause more torque induced lockup?
Let me know

Alexander
It's a combination of things. Engineering tolerances/accuracy, wear, maintenance, lubrication (or lack of it) can result in a perceived difference in the way re-buildable joints feel compared to classic Cardan joints.

The availablity of both types is often a tuning option for 1/8th Buggies and Truggies.




However, the input/output function of both types is technically the same.

Because universal joints are accepted as having lower friction, they are generally recommended on tracks which are lower traction.

Horatio is offline  
Old 03-13-2025 | 01:40 AM
  #32  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

Both are technically the same but different designed
Horatio likes this.
Roelof is online now  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.