Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Boost and ESC timing...Where to set adjustable endbell? >

Boost and ESC timing...Where to set adjustable endbell?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Boost and ESC timing...Where to set adjustable endbell?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2016 | 10:34 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default Boost and ESC timing...Where to set adjustable endbell?

All my experience in brushless is with ROAR "BLINKY" rules. For fun with my kids in our parking lot racing I got some ESCs with variable timing and boost functions that I want to try. We will use them with some older racing motors that have adjustable endbell timing. Where should I set the endbell? Zero?
ESC is the Trackstar 80A which has almost no documentation. Thanks.


The reason I ask is that we do have an old HobbyKing ESC that only gives the variable timing WITHOUT the sensor cable. So the question becomes, 'does the Trackstar 80A add timing to the sensed position or does it use a sensorless algorithm to advance the timing in boost mode?' Because if it does the later, then endbell position won't matter.
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-08-2016 | 10:40 AM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default

If no one knows, then I'll try to figure it out how it is doing the timing with some trial and error.
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-08-2016 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
Grizzbob's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,076
From: Sand Springs, OK
Default

A sensored ESC with a sensored motor DOES know what position the motor's timing is in, & as such, it DOES matter how the motor itself is timed. It's been awhile since I've used boost on my ESC's(the motors around when I did had more limited mechanical timing), but I noticed that some types & brands were more tolerant of boost than others. For example, when I started using boost, I had mainly Novak Ballistic series motors, & noticed that they HATED boost, made no difference what the mechanical timing was set to, they still overheat no matter what I tried(even when intentionally undergearing them, & then they'd be both slow & run hot). but we also discovered that Trinity's Duo2(D2) series motors appeared to be MUCH more tolerant, & we could use timing advance both on the can & in the ESC(though I believe we usually stayed at about 20 degrees advance on the motor itself), & would shoot for somewhere around 50 degrees combined timing(& use the ESC settings to adjust where & when the ESC boost would kick in). But it's generally diffrent for every different design of motor, so it'll really come down to a lot of trial & error for you in figuring out how much to use on the motor & how much in the ESC(best to start maybe with 20 degrees on the motor & gradually experiment with the ESC, adding a little at a time)....
Grizzbob is offline  
Old 04-08-2016 | 02:40 PM
  #4  
vabroom's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 935
From: dark side of the moon
Default

Originally Posted by ic-racer
If no one knows, then I'll try to figure it out how it is doing the timing with some trial and error.
Some days you have to wait more than 6 minutes to get answers.
vabroom is offline  
Old 04-08-2016 | 02:58 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default

That post came off wrong. What it means is I suspect no one knows this ESC because it is new, so I'll be the first to test it and let you all know.

I got the programming card for the ESC today in the mail but it is snowing out side now
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-08-2016 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,342
Default

The endbell timing is tricky, partly because not all motors are labeled the same. For example, and if memory serves, early Novak Ballistics had 30° of timing when the label was at zero. Later ones were labeled with the 30° as the starting point. Some other brands start in the 10 to 20° range if I'm not mistaken.

But in general some timing is needed, I would not start with 0 endbell. I'd start with whatever the motor came with. Maybe a little lower if you know it's a 30° motor.

Then gear down, as boost done right can add a lot of RPM. I had good luck with gearing a good 20-25% or more lower than blinky. Then add in boost carefully. Get it right and a boost setup can be fast and run fairly cool, as proper boost ramping keeps the motor in a more efficient range. But be careful, it also can go over the edge very quickly when overdone. Lots of quick temp checks when testing.
Dave H is offline  
Old 04-09-2016 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default

I have an inertia dyno (FACTS DYNO) and I can find the timing beyond which horsepower falls off the curve. That would be the max timing of the boost, turbo and any mechanical timing I put in the endbell. I'll try that.
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-09-2016 | 01:02 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default

Just to further elaborate here, I looked closely at the programming card which gives the boost and turbo timing advance in degrees. It seems there is plenty of advance timing available with the boost and turbo that one would just leave the motor endbell set on zero.
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-13-2016 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
Default

Finally had a chance to try it today. Not that hard to figure out. I just subtract any boost or turbo timing from the endbell.
So, I had the endbell set to about 25deg from my dyno results (just before current rises sharply).
I added 5 boost and 5 turbo degrees. When they both kick in that is 10 degrees, so I subtract that from the 25 and set the endbell at 15.
ic-racer is offline  
Old 04-13-2016 | 04:02 PM
  #10  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 481
Default

Timing can destroy a motor. I burned up a 17.5 because I had the timing up all the way
and I forgot to gear down, and the motor cooked itself.
Simple mistake of mine that could have been much worse than it was.
Sure I got a nice speed boost outa a 17.5 motor, but was it worth it, probably not.
bmag5000 is offline  
Old 04-16-2016 | 06:55 PM
  #11  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by bmag5000
Timing can destroy a motor. I burned up a 17.5 because I had the timing up all the way
and I forgot to gear down, and the motor cooked itself.
Simple mistake of mine that could have been much worse than it was.
Sure I got a nice speed boost outa a 17.5 motor, but was it worth it, probably not.
Lol hopefully it was just a cheapo $40 motor
Slashn77 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.