TRINITY MOTOLYSER ANY GOOD
#76
Tech Fanatic
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://www.scriptasylum.com/rc_speed/top_speed.html
in this web you can check the information for the motor!
in this web you can check the information for the motor!
#77
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I wrote it down, was no need to
![Smilie](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/smile.gif)
#78
Tech Fanatic
#79
Tech Adept
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just got mine but the C channel current always seems to read higher than the rest no matter what motor I test. Is there a way to check the channel calibration?
#80
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On how many motors did you see this?
After you wrote it I checked a my imgur posts on previous pages and it does seem like it, but then there are a few motors that don't.
Depending on manufacturer and/or person winding maybe?
#81
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
found another use for the motolyser tonight. Quality control for rotor shimming. I had gone one shim too far and as a result +1 amp draw ![EEK!](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/eek.gif)
received three sensor boards for my kill shots for further testing. one good two bad... one had phase C at +0.1 while phase B read -7
![](http://i.imgur.com/ReHMGwgl.jpg)
since I had mostly 21.5 motors I got a couple 17.5 stators as well, a Torque version and a high RPM version. Both with near identical numbers on the certified stickers.![Confused](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/confused.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/lJBnTPCl.jpg)
Really want that store result over USB feature, then can combine that with a USB label maker of some sort.
![EEK!](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/eek.gif)
received three sensor boards for my kill shots for further testing. one good two bad... one had phase C at +0.1 while phase B read -7
![](http://i.imgur.com/ReHMGwgl.jpg)
since I had mostly 21.5 motors I got a couple 17.5 stators as well, a Torque version and a high RPM version. Both with near identical numbers on the certified stickers.
![Confused](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/confused.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/lJBnTPCl.jpg)
Really want that store result over USB feature, then can combine that with a USB label maker of some sort.
#82
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did some teardowns of a R1Wurks and a Killshot.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
).
http://imgur.com/a/AvO2P
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
![Smilie](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/smile.gif)
http://imgur.com/a/AvO2P
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
#83
Tech Fanatic
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did some teardowns of a R1Wurks and a Killshot.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
).
http://imgur.com/a/AvO2P
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
![Smilie](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/smile.gif)
http://imgur.com/a/AvO2P
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
#84
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did some teardowns of a R1Wurks and a Killshot.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
).
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
There are discrepancies in the readout that has me confused (as usual
![Smilie](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/smile.gif)
I was talking to Mr R1 over the weekend he was speculating that there was something mechanical happening that the motolyser can't see. Then he picked up a car with his motor in it, punched the throttle and said "sounds boosted right?". Then we picked up my car and did the same and it sounded "linear". Both ESCs being blinky.
Disclaimer: I am not an expert in any of this stuff, just trying to understand what is going on. If anyone spots errors in my test please point them out and if you have any links to things I need to read before I can "get it" please share.
Perhaps the motolyser is incorrectly reading (false triggering due to noise) the back EMF with the R1?
#85
Tech Rookie
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Has anyone used the GForce analyser and the Motolyser side by side on the same motors ? I have been told that the GForce unit is not accurate and can be off as far as 12*. I'm trying to decide which one to buy and don't want to over spend for info I can't use. Is the Motolyser realy worth it ? I aready have a motor and chassis dyno . Looking for something a little more portable to haul with to the track .Thanks for all the good info so far.---Bob
#86
Tech Fanatic
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Has anyone used the GForce analyser and the Motolyser side by side on the same motors ? I have been told that the GForce unit is not accurate and can be off as far as 12*. I'm trying to decide which one to buy and don't want to over spend for info I can't use. Is the Motolyser realy worth it ? I aready have a motor and chassis dyno . Looking for something a little more portable to haul with to the track .Thanks for all the good info so far.---Bob
#87
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My G-force motor analyzer is not off by 12 degrees. I tested the same motor with a Trinity Motolyser and all of the phases were within a degree of each other in reading. As far as I can tell, the only disadvantage of the GForce unit is you don't get a amp draw reading for each phase.
#89
Tech Fanatic
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My G-force motor analyzer is not off by 12 degrees. I tested the same motor with a Trinity Motolyser and all of the phases were within a degree of each other in reading. As far as I can tell, the only disadvantage of the GForce unit is you don't get a amp draw reading for each phase.
PS did you by any chance happen to test an R1 motor, which seen to be driving TORG nuts?
#90
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks do they have plans to upgrade the G-Force motor tester with new soft/firmware releases to add new features similar to what the Motorlyser folks do (but hopefully better)?
PS did you by any chance happen to test an R1 motor, which seen to be driving TORG nuts?
PS did you by any chance happen to test an R1 motor, which seen to be driving TORG nuts?
![Laughing](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/laugh2.gif)
As for the motor I tested, it was a Team Powers motor, not an R1. I have also tested my Tekins, Trinity Duos, LRP x12 and X20, and others and all required a little "massaging" and centering of the sensor board to get it closer to perfect.