help with Airtronics 92621
07-18-2014 | 08:46 AM
#1
help with Airtronics 92621
I want to know if I can use the airtronics 92621 with my mt4 pistol, some people said me that it has a slow response with the radio, but I really want if it is notable, any experience with this receiver?
http://smhttp.18397.nexcesscdn.net/8...nics_92621.jpg
http://smhttp.18397.nexcesscdn.net/8...nics_92621.jpg
07-18-2014 | 12:07 PM
#3
07-19-2014 | 12:11 AM
#4
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 590
07-21-2014 | 11:52 PM
#5
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
No disrespect to Micah123, but some say they can feel a difference between a slow and a fast radio, some say they can not.
Without hard facts to back me up, but a FHSS2 reciever would in my experience feel slower than a FHSS4 reciever.
I went from an MX-3X, to a M11X and to a M12 and felt the decrease in latency times every time.
I'm one of those die hard low latency believers, and I would NEVER pair a FHSS2 receiver with an MT-4 if you have just the slighest concern about latency times.
And a side note, the 92622 receiver only supports up to 6V, so you can not fully utilize a high voltage servo with this receiver.
Without hard facts to back me up, but a FHSS2 reciever would in my experience feel slower than a FHSS4 reciever.
I went from an MX-3X, to a M11X and to a M12 and felt the decrease in latency times every time.
I'm one of those die hard low latency believers, and I would NEVER pair a FHSS2 receiver with an MT-4 if you have just the slighest concern about latency times.
And a side note, the 92622 receiver only supports up to 6V, so you can not fully utilize a high voltage servo with this receiver.
07-22-2014 | 02:58 AM
#6
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 590
No disrespect to Micah123, but some say they can feel a difference between a slow and a fast radio, some say they can not.
Without hard facts to back me up, but a FHSS2 reciever would in my experience feel slower than a FHSS4 reciever.
I went from an MX-3X, to a M11X and to a M12 and felt the decrease in latency times every time.
I'm one of those die hard low latency believers, and I would NEVER pair a FHSS2 receiver with an MT-4 if you have just the slighest concern about latency times.
And a side note, the 92622 receiver only supports up to 6V, so you can not fully utilize a high voltage servo with this receiver.
Without hard facts to back me up, but a FHSS2 reciever would in my experience feel slower than a FHSS4 reciever.
I went from an MX-3X, to a M11X and to a M12 and felt the decrease in latency times every time.
I'm one of those die hard low latency believers, and I would NEVER pair a FHSS2 receiver with an MT-4 if you have just the slighest concern about latency times.
And a side note, the 92622 receiver only supports up to 6V, so you can not fully utilize a high voltage servo with this receiver.
07-22-2014 | 06:27 AM
#7
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
I race off road.
Many other threads have discussed whether you can percieve a lower latency radio or not. Some can't, others can.
It also depends on what car you're driving, and I do not only distinguish between on and off road.
If you are driving a beat up, sloppy, badly maintained 1/8 buggy with low grade servos etc., you may not feel much differnce, because the reaction of the buggy is so "numbed" by other factors.
The "pros" and other very skilled drivers are those who most often report that they can clearly feel a difference. They are also the ones who have top notch equipment and cars, correctly set up and so on, and the feel of a low latency radio system is clear.
And me? I'm only a club level racer, but I have top notch equipment, well maintained and that are set up correctly. And I can feel a difference.
I had one high speed bumpy corner on our track, that I struggled some to execute correctly, because it involved many fast small corrections. When I changed my M11X to an M12 I instantly felt I could execute the turn better, simply because the buggy reacted faster on the many steering inputs in quick succession.
I don't know the price difference between the 92622 and a FHSS4 MT4 compatible reciever, but you could ask youself whether it is worth it?
If you need a waterproof receiver the FHSS4 capable 92013 receiver are available.
Many other threads have discussed whether you can percieve a lower latency radio or not. Some can't, others can.
It also depends on what car you're driving, and I do not only distinguish between on and off road.
If you are driving a beat up, sloppy, badly maintained 1/8 buggy with low grade servos etc., you may not feel much differnce, because the reaction of the buggy is so "numbed" by other factors.
The "pros" and other very skilled drivers are those who most often report that they can clearly feel a difference. They are also the ones who have top notch equipment and cars, correctly set up and so on, and the feel of a low latency radio system is clear.
And me? I'm only a club level racer, but I have top notch equipment, well maintained and that are set up correctly. And I can feel a difference.
I had one high speed bumpy corner on our track, that I struggled some to execute correctly, because it involved many fast small corrections. When I changed my M11X to an M12 I instantly felt I could execute the turn better, simply because the buggy reacted faster on the many steering inputs in quick succession.
I don't know the price difference between the 92622 and a FHSS4 MT4 compatible reciever, but you could ask youself whether it is worth it?
If you need a waterproof receiver the FHSS4 capable 92013 receiver are available.
07-22-2014 | 08:16 AM
#8
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 590
I race off road.
Many other threads have discussed whether you can percieve a lower latency radio or not. Some can't, others can.
It also depends on what car you're driving, and I do not only distinguish between on and off road.
If you are driving a beat up, sloppy, badly maintained 1/8 buggy with low grade servos etc., you may not feel much differnce, because the reaction of the buggy is so "numbed" by other factors.
The "pros" and other very skilled drivers are those who most often report that they can clearly feel a difference. They are also the ones who have top notch equipment and cars, correctly set up and so on, and the feel of a low latency radio system is clear.
And me? I'm only a club level racer, but I have top notch equipment, well maintained and that are set up correctly. And I can feel a difference.
I had one high speed bumpy corner on our track, that I struggled some to execute correctly, because it involved many fast small corrections. When I changed my M11X to an M12 I instantly felt I could execute the turn better, simply because the buggy reacted faster on the many steering inputs in quick succession.
I don't know the price difference between the 92622 and a FHSS4 MT4 compatible reciever, but you could ask youself whether it is worth it?
If you need a waterproof receiver the FHSS4 capable 92013 receiver are available.
Many other threads have discussed whether you can percieve a lower latency radio or not. Some can't, others can.
It also depends on what car you're driving, and I do not only distinguish between on and off road.
If you are driving a beat up, sloppy, badly maintained 1/8 buggy with low grade servos etc., you may not feel much differnce, because the reaction of the buggy is so "numbed" by other factors.
The "pros" and other very skilled drivers are those who most often report that they can clearly feel a difference. They are also the ones who have top notch equipment and cars, correctly set up and so on, and the feel of a low latency radio system is clear.
And me? I'm only a club level racer, but I have top notch equipment, well maintained and that are set up correctly. And I can feel a difference.
I had one high speed bumpy corner on our track, that I struggled some to execute correctly, because it involved many fast small corrections. When I changed my M11X to an M12 I instantly felt I could execute the turn better, simply because the buggy reacted faster on the many steering inputs in quick succession.
I don't know the price difference between the 92622 and a FHSS4 MT4 compatible reciever, but you could ask youself whether it is worth it?
If you need a waterproof receiver the FHSS4 capable 92013 receiver are available.
07-24-2014 | 01:57 PM
#9
I can feel no difference between FHSS2, 3, or 4. They are all very fast and I have no want or need for more speed out of any of them.
I routinely buy the FHSS2 RXs to save money. I have no issues with them. My race rigs are all FHSS2 and FHSS3 and they all have the same servo. Can't tell a difference in speed between the 3.
I routinely buy the FHSS2 RXs to save money. I have no issues with them. My race rigs are all FHSS2 and FHSS3 and they all have the same servo. Can't tell a difference in speed between the 3.
07-24-2014 | 02:30 PM
#10
For some people who consider the radio equipment to be a long term investment and only need a few receivers they may consider the extra dosh for a fh3 or fh4 rx worthwhile especially considering the added functions of the high end stuff in addition to the "unnoticebley" faster response. It's all a package anyway. A person with a bunch of slop in their steering rack and/or no skill may not notice any difference compared to the finely tuned machine of someone else who's been around a while. I have some of each and I'd like to think that on a good day I can feel it but maybe it's just a good day.
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
