![]() |
Originally Posted by Lolok33Fr
(Post 13164814)
How do you apply the Viterbi algorithm on binaries data ?
I was previously unfamiliar, but I liked this description... http://web.mit.edu/6.02/www/f2010/ha...ectures/L9.pdf |
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12222187-post251.html
howardcano, LOOP CONSTRUCTION: Use 18 AWG stranded, insulated wire. Wire must terminate as closely as possible to loop amplifier input, with minimal lead-in length. Place loop 12" above track. 9'x1' to 12'x1' : No jumpers on loop amplifier. 6'x1' to 8'x1' : Use jumper at J3 on loop amplifier. 3'x1' to 4'x1' : Use jumper at J5 on loop amplifier. On your loop PCB, J4 is not use ? is always ON ? Thanks |
Originally Posted by luluFRA
(Post 13183765)
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12222187-post251.html
howardcano, LOOP CONSTRUCTION: Use 18 AWG stranded, insulated wire. Wire must terminate as closely as possible to loop amplifier input, with minimal lead-in length. Place loop 12" above track. 9'x1' to 12'x1' : No jumpers on loop amplifier. 6'x1' to 8'x1' : Use jumper at J3 on loop amplifier. 3'x1' to 4'x1' : Use jumper at J5 on loop amplifier. On your loop PCB, J4 is not use ? is always ON ? Thanks |
ok, we can delete C6 and R12 if J4 is not used on the loop amplifier.
It ' s OK ? |
Originally Posted by luluFRA
(Post 13185552)
ok, we can delete C6 and R12 if J4 is not used on the loop amplifier.
It ' s OK ? |
Hello Howard,
Great project! i came across this from finding your transponder design thread. Now i have went through alot of it skip some pages, im no electrical engineer but i am interested in this as a low cost system for our club, we are using the Robitronics but its not very accurate and its difficult to get people to spend $45 for that transponder on top of the MyLaps RC4 they already have. We certainly cant afford a RC4 decoder. So if i can build something affordable and hand out transponders for free or for very little charge then we can hold more races and even invite others. 1. From what i understand you have a working decoder with transponders? 2. Do you have an final plans with a list of materials? instructions? 3. Which timing software is compatible with your decoder? We use Flip Side Racing (opensource) i think that fits well with your project! is anyone using this at a track sucessfully ? thanks! |
Originally Posted by rc-demon
(Post 13192253)
Hello Howard,
Great project! i came across this from finding your transponder design thread. Now i have went through alot of it skip some pages, im no electrical engineer but i am interested in this as a low cost system for our club, we are using the Robitronics but its not very accurate and its difficult to get people to spend $45 for that transponder on top of the MyLaps RC4 they already have. We certainly cant afford a RC4 decoder. So if i can build something affordable and hand out transponders for free or for very little charge then we can hold more races and even invite others. 1. From what i understand you have a working decoder with transponders? 2. Do you have an final plans with a list of materials? instructions? 3. Which timing software is compatible with your decoder? We use Flip Side Racing (opensource) i think that fits well with your project! is anyone using this at a track sucessfully ? thanks! http://www.rctech.net/forum/12222187-post251.html Here are some answers to your questions: 1) Yes. 2) Send me your email address in a private message and I'll send all of the info. 3) Flipside and Zround. I'll let our readers respond to your last question. This is a very complex project, if you are not extremely knowledgeable in electronics, you'll need to enlist the help of a friend! |
Originally Posted by howardcano
(Post 13192368)
It's been nearly 10 months since I posted the specs, so for those who have not read through the entire thread (which is getting quite long now!), here they are:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12222187-post251.html Here are some answers to your questions: 1) Yes. 2) Send me your email address in a private message and I'll send all of the info. 3) Flipside and Zround. I'll let our readers respond to your last question. This is a very complex project, if you are not extremely knowledgeable in electronics, you'll need to enlist the help of a friend! Thanks for the quick reply, yes i am possibly able to do this but if not i have friends who are electrical engineers and others that understand electrical so i can get help. I will PM you now with my email. thanks! |
Hi guys!
I have great news - Payalneg find encription method to determine amb/mrt transponders as is - with numbers at box! At this weekend I plan to test this version of firmware, I'll post result ASAP. |
Originally Posted by maeg
(Post 13194154)
Hi guys!
I have great news - Payalneg find encription method to determine amb/mrt transponders as is - with numbers at box! At this weekend I plan to test this version of firmware, I'll post result ASAP. |
Originally Posted by luluFRA
(Post 13183765)
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12222187-post251.html
howardcano, LOOP CONSTRUCTION: Use 18 AWG stranded, insulated wire. Wire must terminate as closely as possible to loop amplifier input, with minimal lead-in length. Place loop 12" above track. 9'x1' to 12'x1' : No jumpers on loop amplifier. 6'x1' to 8'x1' : Use jumper at J3 on loop amplifier. 3'x1' to 4'x1' : Use jumper at J5 on loop amplifier. On your loop PCB, J4 is not use ? is always ON ? Thanks Would the loop work with FlatWire? (taperwire) http://www.taperwire.com/ or other kind of flat wire? thanks! |
Originally Posted by rc-demon
(Post 13195584)
Can the detection loop be installed under a carpet or on the carpet covered by tape? Would like to do this without a bridge.
Would the loop work with FlatWire? (taperwire) http://www.taperwire.com/ or other kind of flat wire? thanks! The gauge of wire affects the tuning slightly, but the biggest reasons I chose 18 AWG were strength, low cost, and availability. You can go thinner if you want to get the carpet to lay flatter, and you can also use ribbon cable with several conductors wired in parallel. Both of these options will likely be cheaper than any specialty wire. |
Originally Posted by howardcano
(Post 13195798)
I think you'll have good luck as long as the floor isn't conductive. But even concrete can have rebar that will mess up the signal.
The gauge of wire affects the tuning slightly, but the biggest reasons I chose 18 AWG were strength, low cost, and availability. You can go thinner if you want to get the carpet to lay flatter, and you can also use ribbon cable with several conductors wired in parallel. Both of these options will likely be cheaper than any specialty wire. Yes ribbon cable sounds like a good idea. Our carpet is directly on concrete so yes there is rebar near by, actually our track is in a basement so we are surrounded by concrete! Can i shield the ribbon cable from the concrete floor? what could be used to do that? thanks! |
Originally Posted by rc-demon
(Post 13203804)
thanks Howard,
Yes ribbon cable sounds like a good idea. Our carpet is directly on concrete so yes there is rebar near by, actually our track is in a basement so we are surrounded by concrete! Can i shield the ribbon cable from the concrete floor? what could be used to do that? thanks! The loop is affected by any conductors nearby, so shielding is exactly the opposite of what we want. My advice is try it and see how it goes. If you encounter problems, you can always go back to the original loop specification. |
It's time for a celebration! This thread is now 16 months old, and just surpassed 50,000 views.
Thanks to all of you for your interest. I hope you have found it fun and informative. :tire::);):D:tire: |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 12:00 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.